Questions and answers

Chamber and committees

Questions and answers

Parliamentary questions can be asked by any MSP to the Scottish Government or the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. The questions provide a means for ��˿�� to get factual and statistical information.

Written questions must be answered within 10 working days (20 working days during recess)
Other questions such as Topical, Portfolio, General and First Minister's Question Times are taken in the Chamber

Urgent Questions aren't included in the Question and Answers search. There is a SPICe fact sheet listing Urgent and emergency questions.

Find out more about parliamentary questions

Filter your results Hide all filters

Displaying 2387 questions Show Answers

Order by |

Question reference: S6W-30262

Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
Date lodged: Friday, 27 September 2024
Current Status: Answered by Angela Constance on 8 October 2024

To ask the Scottish Government what its assessment is of the privacy and human rights implications of live facial recognition technology.

Technological advances in biometrics have brought huge benefits to police and other justice agencies in detecting, preventing and prosecuting crime.

With regard to live facial recognition technology, the Scottish Government is aware that concerns have been raised about privacy and inaccurate results for the faces of people from racialised minorities. That is why it is important that in adopting new technology, it is done in a way that secures public confidence. Any deployment of new technologies should be lawful, effective, proportionate and compliant with the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR).

The use of live facial recognition technology is an operational matter for Police Scotland, under the scrutiny of the Scottish Police Authority. Police Scotland must also abide by the relevant laws; the ECHR; and the Scottish Biometrics Commissioner’s statutory code of practice.

Question reference: S6W-30261

Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
Date lodged: Friday, 27 September 2024
Current Status: Answered by Angela Constance on 8 October 2024

To ask the Scottish Government what steps it is taking to protect the public's right to privacy, in light of Police Scotland's reported decision to use live facial recognition surveillance technology for the first time.

The use of live facial recognition technology is an operational matter for Police Scotland, under the scrutiny of the Scottish Police Authority. Police Scotland must also abide by the relevant laws; the European Convention on Human Rights; and the Scottish Biometrics Commissioner’s statutory code of practice.

The Scottish Government recognises that assurances are required in order to secure public trust and support for any future use of new technology by Police Scotland, including live facial recognition.

We stand ready to work with Police Scotland, the SPA, the Scottish Biometrics Commissioner and others to develop an approach to the use of facial recognition technology which is lawful, effective, proportionate and rights-based.

Question reference: S6F-03447

Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
Date lodged: Monday, 07 October 2024
Current Status: Taken in the Chamber on 10 October 2024

To ask the First Minister when the Cabinet will next meet.

Question reference: S6W-29274

Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
Date lodged: Monday, 26 August 2024
Current Status: Answered by Jenni Minto on 23 September 2024

To ask the Scottish Government how many people in each NHS board area are currently on a waiting list for (a) a kidney and (ii) any other organ transplant.

As at 31 July 2024, the numbers of people active on the waiting list for a kidney transplant by NHS Board are:

Kidney Transplant Waiting List

NHS Board
Ayrshire & Arran	45
Borders	10
Dumfries and Galloway	12
Fife	35
Forth Valley	43
Grampian	36
Greater Glasgow and Clyde	125
Highland	17
Lanarkshire	75
Lothian	72
Orkney	<5
Shetland	<5
Tayside	33
Western Isles	0

As at 31 July 2024, the numbers of people waiting for any other organ transplant by NHS Board are:

NHS Board	Heart	Lung	Liver	Pancreas	Bowel
Ayrshire & Arran	<5	<5	5	5	0
Borders	0	0	0	0	0
Dumfries and Galloway	<5	<5	<5	<5	<5
Fife	<5	<5	<5	<5	0
Forth Valley	0	<5	<5	5	0
Grampian	0	<5	6	6	0
Greater Glasgow and Clyde	6	7	12	17	<5
Highland	0	<5	<5	<5	0
Lanarkshire	5	<5	<5	<5	0
Lothian	<5	5	10	<5	0
Orkney	0	0	0	0	0
Shetland	0	0	0	0	0
Tayside	<5	<5	<5	<5	0
Western Isles	0	0	0	0	0

To note:

If an NHS Board has less than 5 people waiting on an organ transplant the figure has been presented as <5.

Question reference: S6W-28975

Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
Date lodged: Thursday, 22 August 2024
Current Status: Answered by Ivan McKee on 20 September 2024

To ask the Scottish Government whether any companies on the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights database of companies involved in certain activities relating to settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory will be prevented from securing public contracts in Scotland.

The Scottish Government expects companies which are awarded public contracts to maintain high standards of business and professional conduct. Public procurement legislation, implementing the UK’s international obligations in this field, provides that companies may be excluded from bidding for contracts in certain circumstances, including where they have engaged in grave professional misconduct which renders their integrity questionable.

The exploitation of assets in illegal settlements could be regarded as constituting grave professional misconduct for the purposes of procurement law, but a decision to exclude a company from a competition must be taken on a case-by-case basis by the public body awarding the contract in question, in full consideration of all of the evidence available to them at that point in time. Decisions must be proportionate and are subject to challenge in the courts.

Scottish Ministers have no power to require that any company is excluded from all competitions.

Question reference: S6W-29569

Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
Date lodged: Wednesday, 04 September 2024
Current Status: Answered by Shona Robison on 19 September 2024

To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-26007 by Shona Robison on 13 March 2024, whether it will provide an update on how much of the reported £756 million that it received in option fees through the 2022 ScotWind leasing round it spent in 2023-24; how much it projects that it will spend in (a) 2024-25, (b) 2025-26 and (c) 2026-27, and by what date it anticipates that all of the funding will have been spent.

£756 million of ScotWind option fees were received, of which £96 million was used in 2022-23 to support the overall financial position. No ScotWind Revenues were utilised in 2023-24.

£200 million of ScotWind Revenues were profiled as required to support the funding position in the original Scottish Budget for 2024-25. As was set out in the Fiscal Statement to parliament on 3 September current planning is on the basis of utilising up to £460 million of additional ScotWind revenue funding in the current financial year, the entirety of the remaining Scotwind option fee funding.

The statement made clear the intention to reduce this down as far as possible depending on the final financial position, with an update on the in-year consequential position expected at the UK Budget on October 30th. Decisions on the future utilisation of ScotWind Revenues will be taken in due course.

Question reference: S6W-28974

Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
Date lodged: Thursday, 22 August 2024
Current Status: Answered by Richard Lochhead on 19 September 2024

To ask the Scottish Government whether it will publish any correspondence that it has had with companies that have a relationship with Scottish public bodies that are listed on the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights database of companies involved in certain activities relating to settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, in which the Scottish Government has asked what they are doing to cease the activities that led to their inclusion.

The Scottish Government’s response to FOI , on 24 March 2022, sets out the responses from, and any potential issues identified by, the Public Bodies who responded to Scottish Government correspondence asking them to consider the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Database of companies involved in certain activities relating to settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (“UN Database”) in carrying out their human rights due diligence.

The Scottish Government’s response to FOI , issued on 9 February 2023, provides the correspondence between the Scottish Government and all companies identified as having a relationship with a Scottish public body, in relation to what they were doing to cease the activities that had led to their inclusion in the UN Database.

Question reference: S6W-28973

Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
Date lodged: Thursday, 22 August 2024
Current Status: Answered by Richard Lochhead on 19 September 2024

To ask the Scottish Government which companies that have a relationship with Scottish public bodies that are listed on the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights database of companies involved in certain activities relating to settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory it has contacted to ask what they are doing to cease the activities that led to their inclusion.

Question reference: S6W-28972

Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
Date lodged: Thursday, 22 August 2024
Current Status: Answered by Richard Lochhead on 19 September 2024

To ask the Scottish Government whether it has identified any companies that have a relationship with Scottish public bodies that are on the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights database of companies involved in certain activities relating to settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, and, if so, which companies.

Question reference: S6W-28970

Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
Date lodged: Thursday, 22 August 2024
Current Status: Answered by Richard Lochhead on 19 September 2024

To ask the Scottish Government whether it will publish any correspondence that it has sent to public bodies regarding the need for them to consider the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights database of companies involved in certain activities relating to settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory in their human rights due diligence; whether any public bodies have responded to any such correspondence identifying any potential issues, and, if so, whether it will publish these responses.