³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ

The Reach programme, one of the Scottish Funding Council (SFC) funded Access to High Demand Programmes (ADHP), was initially founded in 2010 to improve progression to higher education (HE) and targeted specific schools with lower rates of progression to HE.

In 2017 the targeting criteria for ADHP were expanded to ensure that certain disadvantaged pupils in all schools could benefit from the programme, not just pupils in schools with lower progression rates. This decision was informed by the Commission on Widening Access’ final report, A Blueprint for Fairness, and SFC-funded research looking at the attainment and socio-economic profiles of pupils in all schools in Scotland.

Targeting criteria for AHDP is set by SFC and AHDP partners. Since 2017, the eligibility criteria are:

• Live in an SIMD decile 1-4 (SIMD 20/40); or

• Are care experienced; or

• Are estranged from family and living without family support; or

• Have caring responsibilities; or

• Are seeking asylum in the UK; or

• Have refugee status.

Reach partners may also consider extenuating circumstances outwith the above at their discretion.

This is not a proposal of the Scottish Government.

Marine Directorate staff participate in the ICES Scallop Assessment Working Group (WGScallop) and work closely with national and international research institutes and universities to understand recent advancements and changes to scallop fishing practices. Further details, terms of reference and a link to last year’s report can be found on the ICES community groups pages – when selecting “WGScallop”.

The working group will meet 10-12 October 2023 and a report will be made publicly available.

Scottish Government’s Marine Directorate are in regular communication with stakeholders we established a Fisheries Management and Conservation (FMAC) Scallop sub-group earlier this year. This forum brings together a broad range of scallop sector interests and is the ideal forum for developing stakeholder led solutions, including relating to gear technology, to help deliver sustainable fisheries. Marine Directorate staff are also involved with the Project UK Scallop Fisheries Improvement Projects and with Heriot Watt University and the Scallop Innovation Gear Projects.

The Scottish Government does not routinely provide financial support for the repatriation of historical artefacts.

Due to the unique circumstances and complex logistics as a result of the size of the House of Ni’isjoohl memorial pole, funding was provided to National Museums Scotland to facilitate the pole’s removal from the museum and enable its transport to Leuchars Airfield.

I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-21476 on 2 October 2023. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at /chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers

The causes of stillbirth are complex and in some cases remain unknown. Nevertheless, the Scottish Government is committed to supporting families who have experienced stillbirth and are funding key initiatives to help reduce the incidence of stillbirth in Scotland. This includes the Perinatal strand of the Scottish Patient Safety Programme (SPSP), led by Healthcare Improvement Scotland which works with NHS Boards to improve safety for women, babies and families in Scotland. The SPSP Perinatal stillbirth package supports Boards to reliably and consistently deliver person centred care, effective fetal monitoring, safe communication, and leadership to promote a culture of safety at all levels.

I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-21623 on‎ 29 September 2023. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at /chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers

I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-21623 on‎ 29 September 2023. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at /chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers

The National Elective Coordination Unit (NECU) does not directly remove patients from NHS health board waiting lists. As part of the agreed pathway to support national waiting list validation, and to ensure a patient’s appointment requirements are accurately recorded, NECU’s digitally supported waiting list validation methodology collates the information provided by patients, before returning it to the NHS Board of residence for update within patient administration systems.

To ensure any removals from waiting lists are appropriate, the NECU system records patient responses and their reason for removal. NECU follow-up directly with all patients who have not responded or have not left a comment explaining why they wish to be removed. Similarly, for patients who are unsure of the nature of their appointment, NECU follow-up with the patient directly. Where there is a clinical query from the patient, this is highlighted and the clinical team within the NHS Board of residence are asked to follow-up with the patient. To action a removal, Health Boards review both the patient response and the comment to ensure the reason for removal is appropriate.

Throughout the waiting list validation activity, patients remain on their respective waiting list until the NHS Board agrees it is appropriate to remove the patient.

NECU’s validation process is digitally supported, however, it is not a digital only process. Although all patients are contacted by text message and invited to access a patient portal to record their response, patients who may be unable to access the digital platform are followed-up by the NECU patient coordination team by telephone. If the patient is unable to be reached by both text message and telephone, a recommendation is returned to the NHS Board of residence to send a letter to the patient asking them to contact their Health Board directly. No amendment to the patient’s waiting list entry is actioned until confirmation is received from the patient.

NECU will publish its first annual update in October 2023.

Waiting List Validation is not new. Local Health Boards routinely validate patients on waiting lists to ensure patient requirements are correctly recorded. The establishment of a national approach is based on existing principles. By adopting these principles, a patient would not be removed from a waiting list without contact either by text or phone call, and if required, a clinical consultation.

After a consultation, it may be agreed no treatment is required at the time of referral. However, if the clinical team believe that a further referral for the same condition is likely in the future, or if it is felt that treatment will be required but the patient is not quite ready for this, or if the patient wishes to defer a decision on treatment, the patient will have the ability to make an appointment for the same condition at a future time.

I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-21623 on‎ 29 September 2023. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at /chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers