- Asked by: Neil Bibby, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 September 2020
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 16 September 2020
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will reconsider its position on holding an inquiry into the circumstances that led to the murder of Craig McClelland, following the decision by the Lord Advocate not to conduct a Fatal Accident Inquiry.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 16 September 2020
- Asked by: Neil Bibby, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 06 August 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 26 August 2020
To ask the Scottish Government how the proportion of pupils achieving five (a) Higher and (b) Advanced Higher (i) grades A-C and (ii) grade As in 2019-20 (A) nationally and (B) in each local authority area in (aa) local authority-run and (bb) independent schools compares with the grades at in this range that had been estimated by teachers.
Answer
The information requested is not held centrally.
- Asked by: Neil Bibby, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 06 August 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 26 August 2020
To ask the Scottish Government how the proportion of grades A-C awarded at (a) National 5, (b) Higher and (c) Advanced Higher for 2019-20 (i) nationally and (ii) in each local authority area in (A) local authority-run and (B) independent schools compares with the grades at in this range that had been estimated by teachers.
Answer
The following table, based on information published by the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA), shows the national pass rates at National 5, Higher and Advanced Higher for 2019-20 based on teacher estimates and based on the moderated results as published by SQA on 4 August.
Qualification | 2020 teacher estimates | 2020 moderated teacher estimates as published on 4/8/20 | Comparison (teacher estimates minus moderated results) |
(a) National 5 | 88.6% | 81.1% | 7.5pp |
(b) Higher | 88.8% | 78.9% | 9.9pp |
(c) Advanced Higher | 92.8% | 84.9% | 7.9pp |
pp = percentage points
The Scottish Government does not hold this information broken down by local authority area or broken down between local authority-run and independent schools.
- Asked by: Neil Bibby, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 10 August 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 24 August 2020
To ask the Scottish Government what percentage of the predicted exam grades of pupils with (a) additional support needs and (b) a vision impairment in (i) each local authority and (ii) Scotland were downgraded in the current academic year.
Answer
The information requested is not held centrally.
- Asked by: Neil Bibby, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 10 August 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 24 August 2020
To ask the Scottish Government what direction it provides to the SQA regarding protecting the interests of pupils in the most disadvantaged SIMD quintile.
Answer
Under the Equality Act 2010, the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) cannot discriminate or victimise in conferring qualifications. During 2018–19, SQA reviewed its equality impact assessment practices, and incorporated the Fairer Scotland Duty into the process.
- Asked by: Neil Bibby, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 10 August 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 24 August 2020
To ask the Scottish Government whether the SQA alerted it regarding the potential impact of the moderation methodology used for the 2020 awards on pupils from disadvantaged areas and, if so, on what date.
Answer
Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) provided a broad indication of the equalities impact of its awarding model on 30 July. The SQA results as announced on 4 August showed progress in closing the attainment gap.
- Asked by: Neil Bibby, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 10 August 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 24 August 2020
To ask the Scottish Government what discussions have taken place between the Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills and the SQA regarding the moderation methodology used for the 2020 awards.
Answer
I met with the Chief Examining Officer, Chair of the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) Board, and other members of staff at SQA on a number of occasions and discussed a range of topics, which included the moderation methodology used for the 2020 awards.
- Asked by: Neil Bibby, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 10 August 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 24 August 2020
To ask the Scottish Government how the attainment of pupils with a vision impairment in the 2019-20 school year compared with the previous year at (a) Scottish Credit and Qualifications Framework (SCQF) level 4 or better, (b) SCQF level 5 or better, (c) SCQF level 6 or better and (d) SCQF level 7.
Answer
The information requested is not held centrally.
- Asked by: Neil Bibby, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 10 August 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 24 August 2020
To ask the Scottish Government what action it will take regarding any differing teacher ability in assessing pupil attainment that has been identified by the 2020 awards.
Answer
We are committed to quickly learning from this year’s awards process. Professor Mark Priestley is leading an independent review of the approach to awarding in 2020. Areas being considered by Professor Priestley include teachers’ estimates and he will make recommendations to the Scottish Government.
- Asked by: Neil Bibby, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 10 August 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 24 August 2020
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has carried out regarding the impact of the moderation methodology for the 2020 awards on pupils from poorer areas.
Answer
The Scottish Qualifications Authority is responsible for undertaking an Equality Impact Assessment and Child Rights and Wellbeing Impact Assessment for its approach to awarding in 2020 and both reports were published in full as planned, on 4 August.