- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 03 February 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maggie Chapman (On behalf of the SPCB) on 3 March 2022
To ask the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body (a) how many and (b) what proportion of written questions were processed within (i) 0 to 1 (ii) 2 to 3 (iii) 4 to 5 and (iv) 6 or more days after being lodged, in each week since May 2021.
Answer
Tables A and B set out information about the number and percentage of written questions up to the week commencing 7 February 2022 that have been processed within the timeframe set out in the question.
In providing this information, “processed” has been taken to mean the number of calendar days between a question being submitted by a Member and the question either being published or not lodged. As the information is based on calendar days, it does not take into account factors such as days on which the office of the clerk is closed, i.e. a question which was submitted on a Friday and published on a Monday will be included in the tables as having taken 2 to 3 calendar days rather than reflecting the processing having taken 0 to 1 working days. The data is not held in a format that would enable this further disaggregation to be provided.
There are also a number of elements that may be involved in processing questions. Factors such as seeking clarification of the purpose of a question, editing a question so that it meets the requirements of Standing Orders and Guidance on Parliamentary Questions, or seeking input on issues such as sub judice or compliance with data protection obligations may impact on the time that it takes for questions to be processed. These factors can also impact on the processing time where batches of interrelated questions are submitted among which only one or two may raise more complex considerations. The necessary prioritisation of other items, such as Urgent Questions or motions and amendments for debate, may also impact on the time between a question being submitted and published or not lodged. As noted in the response to S6W-06278, additional staffing resources have been deployed to the Chamber Desk. Once training and familiarisation have been completed, it is anticipated that there will be a positive impact on the time taken to process questions.
Table A
w/c | Total | 0-1 day | 2-3 days | 4-5 days | 6+ days |
---|
10-May | 54 | 49 | 5 | | |
17-May | 136 | 115 | 21 | | |
24-May | 137 | 103 | | 31 | 3 |
31-May | 183 | 156 | 20 | 7 | |
07-Jun | 163 | 117 | 39 | 6 | 1 |
14-Jun | 259 | 213 | 31 | 2 | 13 |
21-Jun | 170 | 151 | 13 | 2 | 4 |
28-Jun | 112 | 41 | 55 | 6 | 10 |
05-Jul | 179 | 126 | 16 | 29 | 8 |
12-Jul | 222 | 122 | 48 | 50 | 2 |
19-Jul | 245 | 188 | 38 | 7 | 12 |
26-Jul | 182 | 159 | 8 | 5 | 10 |
02-Aug | 94 | 41 | 16 | 26 | 11 |
09-Aug | 141 | 60 | 47 | 28 | 6 |
16-Aug | 186 | 55 | 86 | 33 | 12 |
23-Aug | 183 | 41 | 57 | 23 | 62 |
30-Aug | 116 | 11 | 18 | 54 | 33 |
06-Sep | 247 | 45 | 78 | 91 | 33 |
13-Sep | 179 | 5 | 34 | 96 | 44 |
20-Sep | 185 | 94 | 38 | 43 | 10 |
27-Sep | 119 | 14 | 37 | 47 | 21 |
04-Oct | 197 | 111 | 29 | 50 | 7 |
11-Oct | 137 | 73 | 61 | 1 | 2 |
18-Oct | 132 | 80 | 29 | 9 | 14 |
25-Oct | 162 | 38 | 48 | 28 | 48 |
01-Nov | 159 | 5 | 77 | 44 | 33 |
08-Nov | 242 | 12 | 70 | 101 | 59 |
15-Nov | 112 | 26 | 71 | 7 | 8 |
22-Nov | 161 | 57 | 39 | 54 | 11 |
29-Nov | 196 | 11 | 79 | 52 | 54 |
06-Dec | 190 | 7 | 95 | 42 | 46 |
13-Dec | 216 | 31 | 32 | 84 | 69 |
20-Dec | 162 | 6 | 76 | 12 | 68 |
27-Dec | 4 | | | | 4 |
03-Jan | 97 | 40 | 51 | | 6 |
10-Jan | 168 | 58 | 46 | 14 | 50 |
17-Jan | 180 | 46 | 45 | 29 | 60 |
24-Jan | 238 | 4 | 66 | 18 | 150 |
31-Jan | 187 | 7 | 54 | 90 | 36 |
07-Feb | 228 | 13 | 154 | 56 | 5 |
Table B
w/c | Total | 0-1 day | 2-3 days | 4-5 days | 6+ days |
---|
10-May | 54 | 90.74 | 9.26 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
17-May | 136 | 84.56 | 15.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
24-May | 137 | 75.18 | 0.00 | 22.63 | 2.19 |
31-May | 183 | 85.25 | 10.93 | 3.83 | 0.00 |
07-Jun | 163 | 71.78 | 23.93 | 3.68 | 0.61 |
14-Jun | 259 | 82.24 | 11.97 | 0.77 | 5.02 |
21-Jun | 170 | 88.82 | 7.65 | 1.18 | 2.35 |
28-Jun | 112 | 36.61 | 49.11 | 5.36 | 8.93 |
05-Jul | 179 | 70.39 | 8.94 | 16.20 | 4.47 |
12-Jul | 222 | 54.95 | 21.62 | 22.52 | 0.90 |
19-Jul | 245 | 76.73 | 15.51 | 2.86 | 4.90 |
26-Jul | 182 | 87.36 | 4.40 | 2.75 | 5.49 |
02-Aug | 94 | 43.62 | 17.02 | 27.66 | 11.70 |
09-Aug | 141 | 42.55 | 33.33 | 19.86 | 4.26 |
16-Aug | 186 | 29.57 | 46.24 | 17.74 | 6.45 |
23-Aug | 183 | 22.40 | 31.15 | 12.57 | 33.88 |
30-Aug | 116 | 9.48 | 15.52 | 46.55 | 28.45 |
06-Sep | 247 | 18.22 | 31.58 | 36.84 | 13.36 |
13-Sep | 179 | 2.79 | 18.99 | 53.63 | 24.58 |
20-Sep | 185 | 50.81 | 20.54 | 23.24 | 5.41 |
27-Sep | 119 | 11.76 | 31.09 | 39.50 | 17.65 |
04-Oct | 197 | 56.35 | 14.72 | 25.38 | 3.55 |
11-Oct | 137 | 53.28 | 44.53 | 0.73 | 1.46 |
18-Oct | 132 | 60.61 | 21.97 | 6.82 | 10.61 |
25-Oct | 162 | 23.46 | 29.63 | 17.28 | 29.63 |
01-Nov | 159 | 3.14 | 48.43 | 27.67 | 20.75 |
08-Nov | 242 | 4.96 | 28.93 | 41.74 | 24.38 |
15-Nov | 112 | 23.21 | 63.39 | 6.25 | 7.14 |
22-Nov | 161 | 35.40 | 24.22 | 33.54 | 6.83 |
29-Nov | 196 | 5.61 | 40.31 | 26.53 | 27.55 |
06-Dec | 190 | 3.68 | 50.00 | 22.11 | 24.21 |
13-Dec | 216 | 14.35 | 14.81 | 38.89 | 31.94 |
20-Dec | 162 | 3.70 | 46.91 | 7.41 | 41.98 |
27-Dec | 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
03-Jan | 97 | 41.24 | 52.58 | 0.00 | 6.19 |
10-Jan | 168 | 34.52 | 27.38 | 8.33 | 29.76 |
17-Jan | 180 | 25.56 | 25.00 | 16.11 | 33.33 |
24-Jan | 238 | 1.68 | 27.73 | 7.56 | 63.03 |
31-Jan | 187 | 3.74 | 28.88 | 48.13 | 19.25 |
07-Feb | 228 | 5.70 | 67.54 | 24.56 | 2.19 |
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 03 February 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maggie Chapman (On behalf of the SPCB) on 3 March 2022
To ask the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body what the reasons are for the delays in processing written questions.
Answer
Session 6 has seen a change in the nature of the items that the Chamber Desk processes. In particular, the number of Urgent Questions being lodged has increased significantly. This had had an impact on the previous pattern of work undertaken by the Chamber Desk. When Urgent Questions are submitted, they are given priority due to the timeframe for such questions to be taken if selected and only selected questions are published. This, combined with the necessary prioritisation of oral questions and motions and amendments for debate, has resulted in a longer turnaround time for written questions than Members will previously have been used to.
To respond to these changes in demand and pattern of work, additional staffing resources have been deployed to the Chamber Desk. Due to the specialist nature of the services provided by the Chamber Desk, the impact of these additional resources will not be immediately realised as staff require to undertake training and familiarisation with the role. However, the position is being actively assessed on an ongoing basis to ensure that questions and motions are processed in the timeliest manner possible. We are grateful for Members’ forbearance while the necessary training is undertaken.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 02 March 2022
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 10 March 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what work it has undertaken with its partners, and funding it has identified, to accommodate refugees from Ukraine.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 10 March 2022
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 14 February 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Humza Yousaf on 28 February 2022
To ask the Scottish Government whether the current National Infection Prevention and Control Manual guidance on the PPE that should be worn, when providing direct care for patients on the respiratory pathway, should be interpreted to include COVID-19 as a known or suspected pathogen transmitted by the airborne route that requires an FFP3 respirator to be worn when treating a patient with the virus.
Answer
PPE guidance is developed by infection prevention and control (IPC) experts on a four-nation basis and they maintain that current evidence does not support a change to the current IPC guidance on respiratory protective equipment (RPE). WHO has not changed its position on the route of transmission of COVID-19. It is still transmitted predominantly via droplets and contact with contaminated hands or environment.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 14 February 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Humza Yousaf on 28 February 2022
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will update the National Infection Prevention and Control Manual to advise that respiratory protective equipment should be required by healthcare workers treating patients with COVID-19 based on a risk assessment, rather than only being reserved for those performing aerosol generating procedures, in light of the reported findings of a core study on COVID-19 that there was proof beyond reasonable doubt that COVID-19 was an airborne pathogen.
Answer
FFP3 respirator masks can be worn when working in the respiratory pathway in a clinical area deemed as having an unacceptable risk of transmission by the NHS Board. This would be initiated by an environmental risk assessment and rigorous application of the Hierarchy of Controls (HoC).
-
Current Status:
Withdrawn
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 February 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 24 February 2022
To ask the Scottish Government which Minister is responsible for chairing and delivering the work programme of the Homelessness Prevention and Strategy Group.
Answer
The Homelessness Prevention and Strategy Group is jointly chaired by COSLA’s Community Wellbeing Spokesperson, Councillor Kelly Parry and I. We share responsibility for chairing meetings and they and HPSG members have collective responsibility for agreeing the work programme and achieving the goals in the Ending Homelessness Together action plan.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 February 2022
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 24 February 2022
To ask the Scottish Government on how many occasions since May 2021 the Homelessness Prevention and Strategy Group has (a) met and (b) cancelled or rearranged a meeting, and of these, for what reason was the meeting cancelled, and whether the implementation of the next phase of the Ending Homelessness Together action plan is on schedule.
Answer
Since May 2021, the Homelessness Prevention and Strategy Group (HPSG) has met on one occasion, 5 November 2021. Meetings take place once every quarter, subject to parliamentary and local government business, with the next meeting scheduled for March.
A meeting scheduled for June 2021 was cancelled following the Scottish Parliament election to allow time to determine portfolio responsibilities. The meeting scheduled for September 2021 was postponed until November 2021 to accommodate parliamentary business and ensure the co-chair from COSLA was available. The next meeting, which was scheduled to take place in February 2022, has been postponed until March 2022 to accommodate parliamentary business and ensure the co-chair from COSLA was available.
The delivery of the Ending Homelessness Together action plan is on track as demonstrated in our annual progress report, which was laid in Parliament in October 2021. The plan has been welcomed by stakeholders, including HPSG members, who are responsible for overseeing the development and delivery of the plan.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 February 2022
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ivan McKee on 24 February 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6O-00316 by Shona Robison on 3 November 2021, what the (a) name and (b) purpose is of the short life working group; where its minutes are published; how many times it has met, and what the findings of the group are.
Answer
The name of the short-life group was the Materials Shortages Working Group.
The purpose of the group was to examine where the immediate shortages were most acute and to identify opportunities to remove barriers and build capacity within Scotland. The minutes for this group were not published.
The group was set up in June 2021 and met a total of 12 times with the final meeting taking place on Tuesday 28 September 2021.
A letter summarising the key findings from the Materials Shortage Working Group’s work was sent to the Economy and Fair Work committee on 25 January 2022 and has been published on the Scottish Parliament website. Details of this letter can be found in the following link.
Construction Materials Shortages Working Group | Scottish Parliament Website
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 February 2022
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 24 February 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what (a) Equality Impact Assessment and (b) Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment it has conducted in relation to the build-to-rent sector.
Answer
The Scottish Government currently has no initiatives specifically designed to support the growth of the Build to Rent sector. Any Build to Rent development proposals are considered through the planning system taking into account relevant issues and impacts.