- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 20 September 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 3 October 2018
To ask the Scottish Government what role experience panels have had in developing the Provision of Agile Service Design to deliver Social Security Assessments Function contract, and when they were consulted on the information included in the associated Prior Information Notice and at the Supplier Awareness Event.
Answer
The Social Security Experience Panels provided extensive input into the Disability Benefits Discovery work, particularly in relation to their experiences of the current system of assessments. This work has influenced the development of the contract, although they were not directly involved in the development of the Service Design contract or Prior Information Notice.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 20 September 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 3 October 2018
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the reported comments by the former Minister for Social Security in July 2016 and the outcome of its consultation, what progress it has made in phasing out the word "benefit" in relation to social security.
Answer
Our new social security system is being designed with people, not for them.
We are carrying out ongoing user research and we have also conducted research through our Experience Panel of people with lived experience of social security. A report on this research will be published in November 2018.
Social Security Scotland internal guidance on language is taking account of the emerging findings. This includes the use of the word ‘benefit’, which people have told us is the most widely and easily understood term for a form of social security assistance.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 20 September 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 3 October 2018
To ask the Scottish Government how much (a) its Social Security Directorate and (b) Social Security Scotland has spent on goods and services from the private sector, and from which suppliers.
Answer
The Social Security Directorate spent £5.2 million in 2017-18 and has spent £9.6 million to date in 2018-19 on goods and services from the private sector.
Social Security Scotland was formally established as an executive agency of the Scottish Government on 1 September 2018. It has not yet made any payments to private sector suppliers for goods and services but expects to do so in 2018-19.
The Social Security Directorate and Social Security Scotland utilise a range of private sector suppliers. The Scottish Government regularly publishes the detail of all expenditure over £25,000, this includes details of the nature of the expenditure and the supplier for the Social Security Directorate. Social Security Scotland will also publish reports to provide transparency of expenditure over £25,000.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 20 September 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 3 October 2018
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment Social Security Scotland has made of the accessibility and mobility access of (a) the leased buildings and (b) immediate environment of its operational site in (i) Dundee and (ii) Glasgow.
Answer
Accessibility and mobility access both to the interim buildings was a key criteria in arriving at the interim headquarters in Dundee and the office in Glasgow. A crucial component of this analysis was the accessibility of these buildings. The accessibility component considered the buildings themselves and their surrounding environments.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 20 September 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 3 October 2018
To ask the Scottish Government what feedback was received at the Supplier Awareness Event on 11 September 2018 in relation to its notice, Provision of Agile Service Design to deliver Social Security Assessments Function.
Answer
At the event held on 11 September, we had the opportunity to engage with a range of interested suppliers in order to help inform the service design procurement going forward.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 20 September 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 3 October 2018
To ask the Scottish Government what the outcome was of the Supplier Awareness Event on 11 September 2018 for the notice, Provision of Agile Service Design to deliver Social Security Assessments Function, and what the next stage in the procurement process will be.
Answer
The intended outcome is that the event will generate competition for the tender process and that any feedback received will be considered when refining the requirements prior to commencing a tender exercise.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 20 September 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 3 October 2018
To ask the Scottish Government for what reason the Prior Information Notice, Provision of Agile Service Design to deliver Social Security Assessments Function, and Supplier Awareness Event are subject to a non-disclosure agreement.
Answer
The documents cited are subject to a non-disclosure agreement as they contain sensitive information that is not yet in the public domain.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 20 September 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 3 October 2018
To ask the Scottish Government how many potential suppliers (a) registered and (b) attended the Supplier Awareness Event on 11 September 2018 for its notice, Provision of Agile Service Design to deliver Social Security Assessments Function, and who these potential suppliers are.
Answer
The register of those attending the event is attached below.
Company | No. of attendees |
AA & B Consulting Limited | 1 |
BJSS | 2 |
Capgemini UK | 2 |
Chess Digital | 1 |
Deloitte | 2 |
Diona | 1 |
Edge Testing | 1 |
Ernst & Young LLP | 1 |
Exception | 2 |
FutureGov | 0 |
IBM | 2 |
Incremental Group | 1 |
Kainos | 3 |
KPMG LLP (UK) | 1 |
Leidos | 2 |
Made Tech | 0 |
Sopra Steria | 2 |
Tata Consultancy Services | 1 |
Chess Digital | 1 |
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 20 September 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Derek Mackay on 2 October 2018
To ask the Scottish Government how many Public Contracts Scotland tender notices it has issued in each year since 2015-16, including the current year to date, that were subject to a non-disclosure agreement, and what proportion this was of the total number of notices it issued.
Answer
Scottish Government has published 2161 notices since 2015-16. The breakdown for each calendar year is as follows: 2015: 477; 2016: 511; 2017: 615; 2018: 558. Of this number we are aware of 3 notices being subject to NDA. We are also aware of a further 6 procurement exercises which used an NDA although there was no requirement for a contract notice in these instances. Complete data on the use of NDA across Scottish Government is not centrally held and confirmation of the actual number could only be provided at disproportionate cost.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 18 September 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 2 October 2018
To ask the Scottish Government whether the use of the definition of "disability", within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 in the Scottish Tribunals (Eligibility for Appointment) Amendment Regulations 2018, is to be considered as the definition of "disability" for the purposes of the Social Security (Scotland) Act 2018.
Answer
Where words are used without further definition in legislation, they take their natural meaning in each context in which they are used. It is for the courts to interpret them if necessary, not the Scottish Government.