- Asked by: Willie Rennie, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 14 March 2014
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 27 March 2014
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the experience of the opencast coal industry, what its position is on the risks associated with other types of development using bonds to secure funding for long-term (a) environmental maintenance, (b) decommissioning, (c) restoration, (d) aftercare and (e) other work, and what assessment it (i) has made or (ii) plans of these risks.
Answer
Bonds are but one form of a financial guarantee set out in Scottish Planning Policy in relation to renewables, minerals and surface coal mining designed to safeguard against a range of matters including the routine security against the risk of actions not being undertaken, default on undertakings set out in planning conditions or insolvency.
Finance can also be secured by industry guarantee schemes, insurance policies, ring-fenced cash accounts or parent company guarantees.
The matter of restoration bonds has been discussed with planning authorities and parliamentarians represented on the Scottish Opencast Coal Task Force. A sub group to the task force: the Restoration Bonds Working Group is well established and its work will be taken forward by task force working parties to consider the suite of financial instruments and models available to suit the sequential phases of a development from preparatory works through to restoration and aftercare.
To address the situation experienced in the coal sector the Scottish Government’s recent consultation, Opencast Coal Restoration: Effective Regulation invited views on revisions to planning policy and advice including Planning Advice Note 64: Reclamation of Surface Mineral Workings. Responses received are currently being analysed. The output of the consultation will be considered by the task force; the principles of which may inform consideration in developments other than opencast coal.
- Asked by: Willie Rennie, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 18 March 2014
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 26 March 2014
To ask the Scottish Government for what reason the upper estimate for the capital value of the Aberdeen-Inverness rail improvements project in the Infrastructure Investment Plan 2011: Updated Programme Pipeline (January 2014) has risen to ÂŁ600 million compared with the previous update.
Answer
Due to a typing error the upper estimate for the capital value for the Aberdeen to Inverness Rail Improvements Project was increased to ÂŁ600 million, but should read as ÂŁ500 million.
The Updated Programme Pipeline for January 2014, which was published on 17 March 2014, has since been amended with the correct figures.
- Asked by: Willie Rennie, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 18 March 2014
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 26 March 2014
To ask the Scottish Government for what reason the start date for the A96 dual-carriageway Inverness-Aberdeen project does not appear in the Infrastructure Investment Plan 2011: Updated Programme Pipeline (January 2014) compared with the previous update and whether this represents a change in phasing.
Answer
There has been no change in the timetable for delivering the A96 Inverness to Aberdeen dualling programme. The dualling of the A96 between Inverness and Aberdeen is to be completed by 2030 through a phased programme of schemes from 2017 onwards. The timetable in the Infrastructure Investment Plan 2011: Updated Programme Pipeline (January 2014) reflects the commitment in the Infrastructure Investment Plan 2011 to dual the A96 between Inverness and Aberdeen by 2030.
- Asked by: Willie Rennie, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 17 March 2014
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kenny MacAskill on 26 March 2014
To ask the Scottish Government whether the reported statement by a Scottish Government source in The Daily Telegraph of 14 March 2014 concerning an independent Scotland’s security services that “we will take no lessons on this issue from a Westminster establishment whose security services produced the most flawed intelligence of recent times” (a) represents the Scottish Government's position and (b) reflects a change of policy from that in the white paper on independence that “the Scottish Government will work closely with the current UK security and intelligence agencies both to ensure that there is a seamless, secure transition and for the continuing security of both countries”.
Answer
The Scottish Government policy on security and intelligence in an independent Scotland is set out in Scotland's Future, Chapter 7, pages 261-267. It will be in the interests both of Scotland and the rest of the UK to work closely to ensure the security of both countries. The controls put in place over that work in Scotland will be wide-ranging and comprehensive, ensuring intelligence gathering is proper, legal, efficient and effective, in line with international principles for intelligence service oversight.
- Asked by: Willie Rennie, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 18 March 2014
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Russell on 25 March 2014
To ask the Scottish Government for what reason the Scotland’s Schools for the Future programme does not appear in the Infrastructure Investment Plan 2011: Updated Programme Pipeline (January 2014).
Answer
Information relating to the Schools for the Future programme is included within the Infrastructure Investment Plan 2011: Progress Report for 2013 which was published on 17 March 2013. Generic information relating to the schools programme was not included within the accompanying updated programme pipeline as details relating to the delivery of each individual school are now included within the updated project pipeline instead.
In addition, the progress report includes progress details on all those individual schools with a capital value of ÂŁ20 million or more which are currently at outline business case or beyond, and refers within the foreword to those schools which became operational in 2013.
- Asked by: Willie Rennie, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 24 March 2014
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 27 March 2014
To ask the First Minister what issues will be discussed at the next meeting of the Cabinet
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 27 March 2014
- Asked by: Willie Rennie, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 10 March 2014
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 20 March 2014
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide a breakdown of the additional £700 million of tax revenues referred to in its report, Childcare and Labour Market Participation – Economic Analysis.
Answer
As outlined in the Childcare and Labour Market Participation – Economic Analysis paper, the increase in the tax revenues by £700 million that could arise from matching Sweden’s female participation rate would be expected to come from a range of different tax revenue streams.
As highlighted in the paper, as individuals move into employment, or increase the hours they work, they would pay more tax through income tax and national insurance. In addition, as individuals’ incomes increase and their spending rises, receipts from indirect taxes such as VAT, fuel duty and excise duties would also be expected to rise.
- Asked by: Willie Rennie, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 10 March 2014
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 13 March 2014
To ask the First Minister what issues will be discussed at the next meeting of the Cabinet.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 13 March 2014
- Asked by: Willie Rennie, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 03 March 2014
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 6 March 2014
To ask the First Minister what issues will be discussed at the next meeting of the Cabinet.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 6 March 2014
- Asked by: Willie Rennie, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 17 February 2014
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 20 February 2014
To ask the First Minister what issues will be discussed at the next meeting of the Cabinet.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 20 February 2014