- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 December 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 9 January 2018
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on the development of six new elective treatment centres, which were announced in October 2015.
Answer
The Scottish Government’s Capital Investment Group (CIG) oversees the approval process for business cases across NHSScotland and provides the necessary assurances that proposals are robust, affordable, deliverable, and that they are in line with wider NHS policy. Following consideration by the CIG, approval was given for the Initial Agreements for the NHS Highland “North of Scotland Elective Care Centre” and the Golden Jubilee National Hospital "Ophthalmology Unit Development’" on 28 September 2017. The Business Cases for these elective centres are now under development.
The Initial Agreements for the remaining centres continue to be developed, supported and informed by a range of national planning work, and will be considered by the CIG in due course. In line with the original commitment, the programme to deliver the elective centres remains on track for completion by the end of 2021.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 14 December 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 9 January 2018
To ask the Scottish Government for what reason the children's ward at St John's Hospital in Livingston was closed on (a) 3 and (b) 9 December 2017; what discussions it has had with NHS Lothian regarding this, and what action the board is taking to prevent any further such closure.
Answer
The Scottish Government supports NHS Health Boards in their efforts to ensure that they have the right staff in place to meet the healthcare needs of the local population.
NHS Lothian have advised that when the decision was taken to temporary close its Paediatric In-Patient Unit at St John's Hospital on 7 July 2017, a commitment was made to operate a Short Stay Paediatric Assessment Unit (SSPAU) between 08:00hrs to 20:00hrs, Monday to Friday.
NHS Lothian have confirmed that since the introduction of the temporary model, the Board has been able to keep the SSPAU open at the weekends through staff undertaking additional shifts coupled with the use of locum cover. Due to unplanned absence, at short notice, the Board was unable to staff a safe rota for both the 3 and 9 December, resulting in the SSPAU closing on these days.
The Board commissioned the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) to review the work undertaken to secure a sustainable 24/7 staffing model. The College has carried out a review and produced a report which was received by the Board in the Autumn. It concluded that option one remained both the RCPCH’s and NHS Lothian’s preferred option for St John's Paediatric services i.e. 24 hour consultant and Tier 2 [middle grade] cover. The College recognised that the development of this model was a long-term solution depending upon the successful recruitment of consultants, Advance Nurse Practioners (ANP) and Specialty and Associate Specialist Doctors.
NHS Lothian has given an assurance that it is committed to increasing staffing levels and reinstating the 24/7 model.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 12 December 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 9 January 2018
To ask the Scottish Government how much has been committed to the Beating Cancer: Ambition and Action strategy, and how this will be allocated in each of the next five years.
Answer
The Scottish Government committed £100 million of funding to the cancer strategy ‘Beating Cancer: Ambition and Action’ over the 5 year period between 2016 - 2021. To date we have spent £34 million to implement the actions set out within the strategy and the remainder will be allocated over the next three years.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 12 December 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 9 January 2018
To ask the Scottish Government for what reason the opening of the new Royal Hospital for Children and Young People in Edinburgh has been reportedly delayed until Autumn 2018, and what discussions it has had with NHS Lothian regarding this.
Answer
The Scottish Government has regular discussions with NHS Lothian regarding the delay at the new Royal Hospital for Children and Young People in Edinburgh and these discussions will continue until the project is complete.
NHS Lothian have suffered unexpected initial delays on site, which included the liquidation of a crucial sub-contractor, severe weather and issues surrounding piling works.
NHS Lothian remain committed to delivering this flagship facility in a timely manner and to the highest of standards. They are working with the contractors to open the hospital as soon as possible and aim for moves to take place by autumn 2018. Their forensic work with IHSL and Multiplex will continue through regular meetings over the coming weeks and the Scottish Government will be kept fully informed of developments.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 19 December 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 9 January 2018
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-12864 by Shona Robison on 29 November 2017, in light of the consultation discussing options for reforming the way that professional regulators handle complaints from patients and the public, whether it plans to change the current arrangement, in which NHS boards investigate complaints addressed to themselves first before considering the possible involvement of professional bodies, and what the reasons are for its position on this matter.
Answer
The consultation ‘Promoting professionalism, reforming regulation’ is not due to close until 23:59 on 23 January 2018. As such, it would not be appropriate to comment on future options for the development of professional healthcare regulation.
It is open to anyone to refer a registered health professional to the appropriate regulator when concerns arise about their fitness to practise. Complaints handling procedures vary from regulator to regulator and the wide-ranging consultation seeks views on all aspects of regulation, up to and including the structure and number of the regulators themselves. It is important to note that the professional healthcare regulatory bodies operate on an independent basis, according to their respective legislation, and it is for them to consider and take appropriate action on complaints about registrants’ fitness to practise.
When a complaint is made against an employee, it is right that the Health Board as the employer is allowed the opportunity to investigate properly before making a decision about referring the matter to a professional regulator. However, where clear and serious concerns arise, Boards are entitled to and will often make an immediate referral in the interests of patient safety. The ability of a Board to look into complaints enables them to learn from mistakes and take immediate action to support effective clinical governance.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 19 December 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 9 January 2018
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-12864 by Shona Robison on 29 November 2017, in light of the consultation discussing whether there is scope for achieving a more inquisitorial approach within the existing arrangements with regard to practice investigations and calling for further co-operation with employers to achieve local resolution at an earlier stage where possible, how this could be achieved.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S5W-13567 on
9 January 2018. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 19 December 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 9 January 2018
To ask the Scottish Government which international classification of diseases (ICD) for oncology codes were used for brain tumours in the 2016 Scottish Cancer Patient Experience Survey.
Answer
The 2015 Scottish Cancer Patient Experience Survey included all cancers covered by the ICD10 codes from C00 to C96 except C44 (malignant neoplasms) and C84 (some types of lymphomas). This is consistent with the approach taken for other UK Cancer Patient Experience Surveys.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 19 December 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 9 January 2018
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-12864 by Shona Robison on 29 November 2017, in light of the consultation discussing the need for "greater co-operation and data sharing between the professional regulators and other parts of the healthcare regulatory system" and highlighting the role of the Care Quality Commission as a system regulator, how this could be achieved, given that Scotland does not have a system regulator equivalent to the Care Quality Commission.
Answer
The legislative functions of Healthcare Improvement Scotland (HIS) are broadly similar to those of the Care Quality Commission.
The functions and powers of HIS include: supporting, ensuring and monitoring the quality of healthcare provided or secured by NHS Scotland and the provision of quality assurance and accreditation. HIS also has powers in relation to inspections and registration of independent healthcare services.
In addition, Scottish Ministers have direction making powers under Section 10A(3) of the National Health Service (Scotland) Act 1978: in carrying out its functions, HIS is to act subject to, and in accordance with, such directions as may be given by the Scottish Ministers.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 15 December 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 9 January 2018
To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking to (a) maximise the efficiency and (b) keep the costs down of 2017's Health & Care Experience Survey.
Answer
A variety of changes have been made for the 2017-2018 Health & Care Experience Survey to maximise efficiency and keep costs down, including:
-
A number of aspects of the project which were previously contracted out have been brought in house.
-
A survey contractor has been used for administrative aspects of the survey that, for logistical reasons, cannot be completed in house. Value for money was a key criteria in the evaluation of tenders submitted for this work.
-
The look of the survey materials has been refreshed to better engage with survey respondents and increase response rates. This has included reducing the length of the questionnaire by a third.
-
The sampling and weighting methodologies for the survey have been reviewed to ensure that they remain suitable and proportionate.
-
Changes to the mail-out approach for the survey to encourage respondents to complete the survey online.
-
Local level results, which have previously been published as static reports, will be presented via an interactive dashboard which will allow individuals and organisations to interrogate the data in different ways to meet their particular needs.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 15 December 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 9 January 2018
To ask the Scottish Government how much the Health & Care Experience Survey and its predecessor, the GP and Local NHS Services Patient Experience Survey, has cost and how many responses were received in each of the last ten years.
Answer
The information requested is provided in the following table. The results of each iteration of the Health & Care Experience Survey (and its predecessor), including numbers of responses, are available at .
Survey
|
Cost of the Survey (Excl. VAT)
|
No. of responses
|
2009-10
|
580,453
|
185,989
|
2011-12
|
502,610
|
145,569
|
2013-14
|
374,577
|
112,970
|
2015-16
|
458,156
|
111,611
|
2017-18
|
Final cost not yet available
|
Not yet available
|