- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 31 January 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 8 February 2018
To ask the Scottish Government what plans it has to work with (a) patient groups andÌý(b) the health sectorÌýto establish which managed access schemes and conditional acceptance options will be of greatest benefit.
Answer
Since publication of the Montgomery Review of Access to New Medicines, we have been working closely with relevant partners, stakeholders, patient representatives, the third sector and the pharmaceutical industry to consider the most appropriate and effective way to take forward the recommendations.
I wrote to the Health and Sport Committee on 16 November to provide an update on the Scottish Government’s progress on implementing the recommendations of the Montgomery Review. I will provide a further update to the Committee in the Spring.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 31 January 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 8 February 2018
To ask the Scottish Government when itÌýwill publish the findings of itsÌýcomparative review ofÌýthe health technology assessment processes ofÌýother countries,Ìýincluding those for orphan and ultra-orphan medicines.
Answer
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 31 January 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 8 February 2018
To ask the Scottish Government, furtherÌýto the letter to the Health and Sport Committee by Shona Robison on 16 November 2017,Ìýwhat progress has been madeÌýwith the development of a new pathway for ultra-orphan medicines; what consultation on this it has carried out or plans, and when the pathway will be in place.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S5W-14278 on
8 February 2018. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at:
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 25 January 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 8 February 2018
To ask the Scottish Government how many patients in each NHS boardÌýare currently being treatedÌýin hospital in another NHS board area.Ìý
Answer
The information on current patients is not held centrally. However, previous data on cross-boundary flows for 2016-17 was published in November 2017 and is available from the following link:
The majority of patients are treated in a hospital located in their own local NHS Board area. However, around 1 in 8 admissions (12%) are to hospitals within other NHS Board areas. The reasons for patients not being treated in their own NHS Board area will include the provision of specialist national and regional services, where an emergency may have occurred, or it may simply reflect the natural ‘catchment’ area of a particular hospital, being the closest to the patient.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 25 January 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 8 February 2018
To ask the Scottish Government howÌýmany employeesÌýfrom the EU are employed by each NHS board, also broken down by what percentage of staff this represents.Ìý
Answer
The Scottish Government believes that EU citizens make a vital contribution to the delivery of NHS services in Scotland. Given the uncertainties presented by Brexit, we are working with all NHS Scotland Boards, and engaging with the professional regulatory bodies, to support on-going impact assessment and workforce planning activity, in line with Boards’ service provision responsibilities.
We know from Annual Population Survey Estimates (2016) indicate that approximately 3.5% of the health and social care workforce in Scotland (c.13,000 individuals) are EU/EEA nationals. Nevertheless, the proportion of the workforce who are of EU/EEA origin will vary considerably from profession to profession, as data from the professional regulatory bodies, including the General Medical Council and the Nursing and Midwifery Council demonstrates.
The Scottish Government has clearly set out the importance of continuing membership of the Single Market, which would be the best outcome for both our NHS and wider public service delivery in Scotland.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 25 January 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maureen Watt on 8 February 2018
To ask the Scottish Government how many accessible toilets with hoists and adult changing beds each NHS board has.
Answer
There are currently 157 Changing Places Toilets (CPTs) across Scotland. Unlike other regions of the UK, the number of CPTs in Scotland has been increasing. The location of each CPT in Scotland can be found at .
The Scottish Government is fully committed to the continuing provision of CPTs through our A Fair Scotland for Disabled People action plan ambition, ‘places that are accessible to everyone’. We work closely with PAMIS, the only organisation in Scotland which works with people with profound and multiple learning disabilities and their families for a better life. PAMIS continues to progress the CPT campaign, and has engaged with a range of stakeholders, particularly in areas where there are limited or no CPTs.
The following table details the number of Changing Places Toilets in NHS Boards premises:
Ìý
NHS BOARD
|
Number of Changing Places Toilets
|
Ayrshire and Arran
|
2
|
Borders
|
0
|
Dumfries and Galloway
|
1
|
Fife
|
3
|
Forth valley
|
1
|
Grampian
|
4
|
Greater Glasgow and Clyde
|
4
|
Highland
|
0
|
Lanarkshire
|
0
|
Lothian
|
0
|
Orkney
|
0
|
Shetland
|
0
|
Tayside
|
2
|
Western Isles
|
0
|
TOTAL
|
17
|
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 25 January 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen Campbell on 8 February 2018
To ask the Scottish Government how muchÌýit hasÌýspent on smoking cessation campaigns in each year since 1999.
Answer
Information on how much the Scottish Government has spent on cessation and related campaigns in each year from 1999 is as follows:
Ìý
Year
|
Cessation and related spend
|
1999-2000
|
N-A
|
2000-2001
|
N-A
|
2001-2002
|
N-A
|
2002-2003
|
N-A
|
2003-2004
|
N-A
|
2004-2005
|
-
|
2005-2006
|
£ 1,255,442.36
|
2006-2007
|
£ 76,188.31
|
2007-2008
|
-
|
2008-2009
|
£ 16,000
|
2009-2010
|
-
|
2010-2011
|
£ 395,760.56
|
2011-2012
|
£ 509,603.53
|
2012-2013
|
£ 412,242.16
|
2013-2014
|
£ 336,520
|
2014-2015
|
£ 489,494.00
|
2015-2016
|
£ 588,230
|
2016-2017
|
£ 133,977.02
|
* N-A means information is not held.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 25 January 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 8 February 2018
To ask the Scottish Government what the average waiting time is for patients with stomach or gastro concerns to be seen in A&E units, also broken down by NHS board area.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S5W-14083 on 6 February 2018. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at http://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 22 January 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen Campbell on 8 February 2018
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to questionÌýS5W-13628 by Aileen Campbell on 18 January 2018, how many chronic pain patients were interviewed toÌýprovide the feedback to theÌýministerial steering group, and what its position is on whether thisÌýnumber representedÌýan adequate sample of patients.
Answer
The views passed onto NHS Information Services Division were taken directly from discussions at the Ministerial Steering Group for Chronic Pain on 4 October 2016, to help understand inconsistences in the data collection and definitions used by Boards.
As part of moving the Chronic Pain Waiting Times Publication from developmental status to Experimental Official Statistics, ISD carried out a consultation with users and published a report in October 2017. ISD will be implementing changes over forthcoming publications and are also happy to receive feedback on publications at any point in time.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 25 January 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maureen Watt on 7 February 2018
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-11463 by Maureen Watt on 5 October 2017, whether it will provided an update on when the review will be published.
Answer
The report of the review of rejected referrals will be published by the 31 May 2018.