- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 24 August 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jeane Freeman on 1 September 2020
To ask the Scottish Government whether anticipated cost savings as a result of moving towards the use of non-branded and generic pharmaceutical products were a factor in the decision to remove all prescription charges, and what analysis it has conducted of cost savings as a result of moving towards the use of such products.
Answer
The prescribing of generic medicines has been a long term initiative and was not the key decision behind the abolition of prescription charges. The prescribing of generic medicines can often cost considerably less than branded equivalents, and are clinically as effective. This is actively promoted within NHSScotland and accounts for 84% of all dispensed medicines in the community.
Prescription charges were abolished in April 2011 because Scottish Ministers believe that prescription charges are a tax on ill health, and are a barrier to good health for many people. This is particularly so for those with long-term conditions and those on low incomes who in the past have faced choices about which medicines they can afford to take.
The introduction of free prescriptions has been fully funded by the Scottish Government, at no cost to NHS budgets. Prescribing decisions are ultimately matters for each clinician taking into account the individual circumstances and treatment needs of each patient.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 26 August 2020
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 3 September 2020
To ask the Scottish Government what discussions ministers have had regarding reported concerns relating to the underfunding of The City of Edinburgh Council.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 3 September 2020
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 May 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jeane Freeman on 26 August 2020
To ask the Scottish Government when it will be making the first payments from the £19 million that it announced on 28 April to support hospices.
Answer
On the 29 June, I wrote to Scottish Hospices to confirm that their funding requests (totalling £10.1m) related to loss of income during the pandemic during the first financial quarter of 2020 would be met in full. Integration Authorities and NHS Boards were also notified of this on the same date, and the funding was processed for onward allocation to hospices at the end of June 2020.
It is important to reflect that this funding was provided on a one off basis for the full first quarter of the year to account for loss of income during the pandemic, and that we expect the existing commissioning arrangements between hospices and Integration Authorities to be maintained going forward.
It is also important to reflect that in April 2020, I indicated that Scotland was likely to receive an estimated £19 million in consequentials in respect of the £200 million for hospices included in the UK Government’s announcement of £750 million for charities. HM Treasury have not yet provided an updated final consequential funding figure associated with the original announcement, although it is expected to be significantly lower than the £19m originally expected.
When we have clarification on the total consequential funding we will receive this will be allocated in full to Scottish Hospices.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 29 June 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jeane Freeman on 21 August 2020
To ask the Scottish Government what information it has on the types of COVID-19 antibody tests that it is currently using and where they are manufactured.
Answer
The NHS in Scotland is currently using COVID-19 antibody tests from the following companies. The table also includes details on where they are manufactured.
Type of Test | Where it is manufactured |
Diasorin | Italy |
Abbott | USA |
Roche | USA |
Siemens | Germany |
Euroimunne | Germany |
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 July 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by Joe FitzPatrick on 20 August 2020
To ask the Scottish Government when organisations that work with people recovering from drug and/or alcohol addiction will be permitted to resume using church halls and other community facilities, and what discussions it has had with these organisations and other stakeholders regarding this.
Answer
Scotland's roadmap that details the phased pathway out of lockdown was updated on the 30th July, and includes guidance and advice for community spaces and churches regarding opening for meetings. Where third sector providers of support groups deem remote support is insufficient for the people they work with, community and relevant centres can open for the purpose of resuming face-to-face and group support where deemed essential and where appropriate protective measures according to current guidance, such as physical distancing, are in place. The Scottish Government has worked with the Scottish Recovery Consortium and providers of alcohol and drug support groups to develop guidance to enable these meetings to restart. I have attached the link for further guidance -
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 July 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by Joe FitzPatrick on 20 August 2020
To ask the Scottish Government what support it has provided during the COVID-19 crisis to organisations that work with people recovering from drug and/or alcohol addiction, and what its response is to reported concerns that this has not been sufficient.
Answer
Scotland’s Interim Chief Medical Officer Dr Gregor Smith and I wrote to health boards and Integration Joint Boards on 16 April 2020 to ensure the need for continuation of care for this group of people is prioritised. A copy of this letter can be found .
Scottish Health Action on Alcohol Problems (SHAAP) and the Scottish Drug Forum both published national guidance on contingency planning for the delivery of alcohol and drug services during the pandemic. You will find the SDF guidance , and the SHAAP guidance here .
Additional funding was also set out through the Wellbeing Fund and the Supporting Communities Fund. The link attached provides a more detailed look of this breakdown -
The Scottish Government continues to monitor service levels to help support local areas where any difficulties in sustaining support services are being found .
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 30 July 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jeane Freeman on 18 August 2020
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-30403 by Jeane Freeman on 28 July 2020, what its response is to student paramedics' reported concerns that the support that they receive is less than provided to a number of others, including nursing students, and whether it will reconsider offering a bursary to paramedic students.
Answer
The Scottish Government recognises the concerns of student paramedics and we will shortly be commencing a review of the education provided to Allied Health Professionals, including paramedics, and the financial support offered to students will be considered as part of this review.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 21 July 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kate Forbes on 18 August 2020
To ask the Scottish Government how many (a) Special Advisers, (b) communications staff and (c) public relations officials it has appointed since 1 January 2018; on what dates each was appointed; whether they were employed on a full- or part-time basis, and what the total (i) salary and (ii) pension cost was for each.
Answer
Two Special Adviser appointments were made during the period stated: October 2018 and January 2020. Both are full-time appointments. Salary information for Special Advisers is published annually in Government Initiated Questions (GIQ). Although two Special Advisers were appointed, the overall number of Special Advisers remains the same.
The following tables provide an overview of the frontline communications staff/press officers recruited, on a permanent and temporary basis, during the period stated. All appointments have been on a full-time basis. The Scottish Government does not employ any public relations staff.
2018 | Appointment Pay Range |
Month | B1 | B2 | B3 | C1 |
Feb-18 | - | 2 | - | - |
Apr-18 | - | - | 1 | - |
Jun-18 | - | - | - | 1 |
Jul-18 | - | - | - | 1 |
Aug-18 | - | - | 1 | - |
Oct-18 | 1 | - | - | - |
Nov-18 | - | 7 | - | - |
Dec-18 | - | 2 | - | - |
2019 | Appointment Pay Range |
Month | B2 | B3 |
Jan-19 | 1 | 2 |
Feb-19 | - | 1 |
Mar-19 | - | 1 |
Jul-19 | 1 | 4 |
Aug-19 | 1 | - |
Oct-19 | 1 | 1 |
2020 | Appointment Pay Range |
Month | B2 | B3 |
Jan-20 | - | 1 |
Feb-20 | - | 1 |
Apr-20 | 1 | - |
2020 information relates to the period 1 January 2020 to 31 July 2020.
The following tables set out the salary rates applicable to each pay range.
1 April 2018 – 31 March 2019
| | B1 | B2 | B3 | C1 |
Max-3 | £24,580 | £28,891 | £36,328 | £46,889 |
Max-2 | £25,559 | £30,292 | £37,847 | £50,427 |
Max-1 | £26,538 | £31,693 | £40,305 | £53,965 |
Max | £27,515 | £33,094 | £43,923 | £57,503 |
1 April 2019 – 31 March 2020
| | B2 | B3 |
Max-3 | £29,759 | £37,418 |
Max-2 | £31,201 | £38,507 |
Max-1 | £32,644 | £40,965 |
Max | £34,087 | £45,241 |
1 April 2020 – 31 March 2021
| | B2 | B3 |
Max-3 | £30,652 | £38,541 |
Max-2 | £32,138 | £39,663 |
Max-1 | £33,624 | £42,194 |
Max | £35,110 | £46,599 |
Employer pension rates are published on the civil service pensions website and can be accessed using the following link:
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 27 July 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 13 August 2020
To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking in response to the reported delays to hearings of the Additional Support Needs Tribunal.
Answer
The Additional Support Needs jurisdiction of the Health and Education Chamber of the First-Tier Tribunal for Scotland hears references regarding certain decisions of education authorities regarding the provision of educational support under the Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Act 2004.
The First Tier Tribunal is an independent judicial body. The Scottish Government has been kept updated on the actions taken by the Tribunal to mitigate the delays it has faced as a result of the Covid-19 Pandemic.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 31 July 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jeane Freeman on 12 August 2020
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to concerns regarding reported health and social care budget reductions proposed by the Edinburgh Integration Joint Board (EIJB), and how it will ensure that EIJB has sufficient funding to meet local health and social care requirements.
Answer
The budget for the Edinburgh Integration Joint Board has increased by £23.6 million to £681.1 million in 2020-21.
Along with all Integration Joint Boards, Edinburgh is working to address its savings challenge for the year and to deliver financial balance. All savings delivered by the IJB will be retained by the IJB for reinvestment in local services.
In response to the current pandemic, Edinburgh IJB has already received £4.1 million, its share of the initial £50 million announced to support immediate challenges in the social care sector, supporting initiatives such at the Social Care Staff Support Fund ensuring social care workers do not experience financial hardship if they are ill or self isolating due to coronavirus. To implement the real living wage pay increase from 1 April, the IJB received an additional £1.2 million. The IJB will also receive its share of up to a further £50 million announced on 3 August.
The Scottish Government expects all Integration Authorities to operate within the resources available and continues to provide substantial additional funding across the health and social care sector to address the challenges arising from Covid-19. The Scottish Government expects Edinburgh IJB, along with its funding partners, to follow the clear protocol in place for addressing financial challenges and remains in close contact with the Integration Authority as part of this process.
