- Asked by: Maurice Golden, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 29 May 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 7 June 2019
To ask the Scottish Government how many prosecutions used its most recent guidance on the use of electronic shock collars for dogs since it was published.
Answer
The Crown Office Prosecution Service have advised that there have been no prosecutions for unnecessary suffering under the Animal Health and Welfare (Scotland) Act 2006 relating to the use of electronic training aids since 1 October 2018. Information on the use of the guidance in providing advice to enforcement authorities and dog owners will be gathered during the review of the guidance in autumn 2019.
- Asked by: Maurice Golden, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 29 May 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 7 June 2019
To ask the Scottish Government what review it has conducted of the effectiveness of its most recent guidance on the use of electronic shock collars, and when it plans to make the findings public.
Answer
The Scottish Government committed to reviewing the effectiveness of the guidance on dog training aids in preventing welfare compromises due to aversive training methods after 12 months and in light of the experience of enforcement authorities. The Guidance was published in October 2018 and the review has therefore not yet begun.
- Asked by: Maurice Golden, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 May 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Joe FitzPatrick on 7 June 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-22863 by Joe FitzPatrick on 14 May 2019, what funding it made available to the hospitality sector to support (a) the use of the tools outlined and (b) staff training programmes.
Answer
Food Standards Scotland (FSS) purchased the licence for MenuCal from the Food Safety Authority of Ireland in March 2016, costing £132,947.25.
Subsequently, FSS, in partnership with the Scottish Food Enforcement Liaison Committee, piloted MenuCal with Scottish businesses. The outcomes from the pilot report, have been considered and changes have been made to improve the usability of the tool for businesses in Scotland, costing £12,336. The outcomes from the pilot report can be accessed on the following link: . MenuCal is currently being promoted to businesses via the Environmental Health Departments in Local Authorities and the Trail Blaze sites outlined in the Scottish Government’s ‘A healthier future: Scotland's diet and healthy weight delivery plan’ which can be accessed on the following link: .
- Asked by: Maurice Golden, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 May 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Joe FitzPatrick on 7 June 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-22864 by Joe FitzPatrick on 14 May 2019, whether it will provide the information requested regarding what its position is on making it compulsory for food outlets to have dedicated staff members trained to oversee the preparation of food for customers with allergies.
Answer
It is the legal responsibility of food business operators to produce safe food, and that includes having effective procedures in place in relation to allergens. Food businesses are required by law to ensure that staff have the necessary knowledge to produce safe food. Food businesses are expected to have staff capable of providing accurate allergen information to consumers about what is in the food they buy. As a matter of best practice, it is recommended that food business operators consider using a system where staff direct allergen queries to a nominated person to ensure the consistency of allergen information to consumers.
- Asked by: Maurice Golden, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 May 2019
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 6 June 2019
To ask the Scottish Government how it plans to treat online marketplaces in relation to returns in its planned deposit return scheme.
Answer
Where a single-use drinks container sold online is delivered to a consumer in Scotland, a deposit will be applied to that container. Retailers that provide a delivery service will be required to provide a doorstep takeback service. We are considering further what duties should apply to online sales which are fulfilled using a postal or courier delivery service.
- Asked by: Maurice Golden, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 May 2019
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 6 June 2019
To ask the Scottish Government what analysis it has undertaken regarding the impact of a separate Scottish deposit return scheme on food and drink exports.
Answer
The Scottish Government will shortly publish a Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment offering an analysis of the costs and benefits to business associated with implementation of a deposit return scheme.
- Asked by: Maurice Golden, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 May 2019
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 6 June 2019
To ask the Scottish Government what the effect will be of the introduction of its planned deposit return scheme and reverse vending machines on the rateable values and business rates for retail premises.
Answer
The valuation of all non-domestic property is a matter for independent Scottish Assessors and it will be for them to consider the appropriate practice pertaining to the valuation of reverse vending machine sites in accordance with valuation law. The Scottish Government will continue to consider the implications of the scheme on those businesses acting as return points.
- Asked by: Maurice Golden, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 May 2019
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 6 June 2019
To ask the Scottish Government whether businesses paying producer fees into its planned deposit return scheme will also be required to pay into the current PRN (Packaging Recovery Note) system.
Answer
We are working with the UK Government on the interaction between DRS and the existing packaging obligations. Our intention is that producers will not pay into the PRN system for containers obligated under the DRS .
- Asked by: Maurice Golden, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 May 2019
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 6 June 2019
To ask the Scottish Government whether it has received assurances that the deposit in its planned deposit return scheme will not be subject to VAT.
Answer
The Scottish Government is clear that the desired outcome is that the deposit should not be subject to VAT. Discussions are ongoing with the UK Government to reach a final position on this matter.
- Asked by: Maurice Golden, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 May 2019
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 6 June 2019
To ask the Scottish Government what level of financial guarantee it will provide for its planned deposit return scheme.
Answer
Deposit return represents a cost effective mechanism through which businesses will meet their producer responsibility obligations to manage packaging at end of life. In line with the principle of extended producer responsibility, it is for producers rather than Government to meet those costs. The Scottish Government will, however, continue to be engaged around the financing of the scheme as part of the work of the Implementation Advisory Group.