- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 03 March 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 14 March 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive what volume of oil would be spilt if the BP Forties pipeline system were ruptured during construction of the Forth Replacement Crossing.
Answer
While the volume has been calculated for designing suitable mitigation measures it would be inappropriate to release this information.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 03 March 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 14 March 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive whether Transport Scotland has a business continuity programme in place to manage the risks in the event of the BP Forties pipeline system being damaged during construction of the Forth Replacement Crossing.
Answer
Transport Scotland will continue to operate in the event of any damage to the pipeline.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 03 March 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 14 March 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive what BP鈥檚 estimate is of lost revenue in the event of damage to the BP Forties pipeline system during construction of the Forth Replacement Crossing.
Answer
Financial information relating to those costs is commercially confidential and cannot be released.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 March 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Mather on 14 March 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will reconsider the consultation process on Forth Energy鈥檚 proposals for a biomass power station at Dundee given that many objections have not been acknowledged due to an invalid email address.
Answer
A decision was taken within the Energy Consents and Deployment Unit (ECDU) at the beginning of October 2010 to cease acknowledging representations in writing, due to the excessive costs involved. This meant that members of the public who submitted representations between the middle and end of September 2010, to the address
[email protected], or in writing, did not receive an acknowledgment.
The address [email protected] is not invalid, members of the public were asked to direct representations to the dedicated email address [email protected] to allow easier collation of these responses and to ensure they received the automatic acknowledgement. All representations received to either address have now been collated and logged.
There is no requirement under legislation to acknowledge, either in writing or electronically, representations received.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 March 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Mather on 14 March 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive how many objection letters its Energy Consents Unit has received in relation to Forth Energy鈥檚 proposals for a biomass power station at Dundee and, of those, how many have been published on the relevant website.
Answer
To date, the Energy Consents and Deployment Unit (ECDU) have received 36 consultation responses from a variety of organisations with an interest in the development. These responses are all available on the Scottish Government website. The ECDU have also received 3,292 representations from members of the public. These are not published on the Scottish Government website to protect the identities of individuals.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 March 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Mather on 14 March 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive for what reason an invalid email address was given on the Energy Consents Unit website for objections to be made to Forth Energy鈥檚 proposals for a biomass power station at Dundee and what steps it took to rectify this problem.
Answer
Press notices were placed in the Scotsman on 17 August 2010 and in the Dundee Courier and Edinburgh Gazette on 17 August 2010 and 24 August 2010 advising members of the public of the submission of the application. These notices advised members of the public to submit representations to
[email protected], which is the enquiries email address for the Energy Consents and Deployment Unit (ECDU). The second press notices for this development were placed in
The Scotsman on 9 November 2010 and in
The Courier and
Edinburgh Gazette on 9 November 2010 and 16 November 2010. These notices advised members of the public to submit representations to the dedicated Dundee Biomass email address
[email protected], which had been implemented to deal with the level of representations being received. The biomass section of the ECDU website quoted the dedicated email address as the point of contact during the consultation. The ECDU enquiries email address is quoted elsewhere on the website as general point of contact, hence no amendment or correction was required.
All representations received to either email addresses have been collated and logged.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 24 February 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Russell on 10 March 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive how much it has spent on research and development, broken down by portfolio, in each of the last five years.
Answer
Government spend on research and development (R&D) is collected through the Office for National Statistics Annual Government Research and Development Survey. The latest published figures are for the financial year 2008-09.
Scottish Government spend on research and development, 2004-05 to 2008-09
| Year | R&D spend by Portfolio (拢 thousands) | Total |
| Education & Lifelong Learning | Finance & Sustainable Growth | Health & Wellbeing | Justice | Rural Affairs & Environment |
| 2004-2005 | 2,480 | 8,943 | 54,992 | 2,651 | 61,753 | 130,819 |
| 2005-2006 | 3,074 | 9,997 | 57,109 | 2,710 | 63,965 | 136,855 |
| 2006-2007 | 3,309 | 8,313 | 63,362 | 2,661 | 54,439 | 132,084 |
| 2007-2008 | 2,778 | 8,218 | 61,187 | 4,300 | 60,595 | 137,078 |
| 2008-2009 | 3,163 | 8,728 | 63,371 | 5,044 | 59,291 | 139,597 |
Source: Government Research and Development Survey, Office for National Statistics.
The table includes R&D spending by Scottish Government directorates, associated agencies and non-departmental public bodies.
However the table excludes:
Scottish Funding Council grants to universities for Research and Knowledge Transfer.
One-off funding mechanisms e.g. the 拢10 million Saltire Prize, 拢13 million WATERS scheme.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 14 December 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 14 February 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it funds work in Scotland in the fields of conflict resolution, non-violence and cooperation; whether it has received proposals regarding a role for Scottish Churches House in this respect, and, if so, what its response is to such proposals.
Answer
Whilst recognising the merits of the proposal and the potential role that Scotland could play in promoting conflict resolution, non-violence and cooperation, the Scottish Government is not in a position to fund activity of the kind proposed at the current time. As a result the Scottish Government has, with regret, been unable to lend its support to the proposal relating to Scottish Churches House.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 28 January 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kenny MacAskill on 8 February 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S3W-36630 by Kenny MacAskill on 21 October 2010, whether it considers that police officers are not bound by the prohibition in section 3 of the Firearms Act 1968 on making guns without being registered as a firearms dealer.
Answer
It is not for the Scottish Government to provide detailed legal interpretation of the provisions in the Firearms Act 1968. Firearms policy and legislation is reserved to the UK Parliament.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 28 January 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kenny MacAskill on 7 February 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive whether its position on the entitlement of chief constables to deploy Taser weapons to frontline officers extends to the other weapons with the same legal classification under section 5 of the Firearms Act 1968.
Answer
It is not for the Scottish Government to provide detailed legal interpretation of the provisions in the Firearms Act 1968. Firearms policy and legislation is reserved to the UK Parliament.