- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 20 March 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Henry McLeish on 3 April 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the total cost of funding of the learning resource centre at Inverness College was #4,806,000 and, if it was not, what was the actual cost, and whether it will (a) provide a breakdown of the cost between the services diversion, departmental relocation, learning resource centre, front-of-house professional fees and value added tax, and (b) provide a breakdown of how the total costs were funded between the following contributory bodies, (i) the Millennium Commission, (ii) European Regional Development Fund, (iii) Inverness and Nairn Enterprise, (iv) Highland Council (v) Inverness College, showing in each case the actual amount contributed by each of the funding bodies.
Answer
This information is not held centrally.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 20 March 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Henry McLeish on 3 April 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether an independent inquiry will be conducted into the financial accounts of Inverness College to investigate (a) the reasons for the accumulated deficit and (b) all capital projects including building works and alteration works, and in particular, (i) why the total cost of "department relocations" for the learning resource centre amounted to #823,000, (ii) where the accounts show any entry in respect of revenue accruing as a result of the sale, to the contractors, of the design of the proposed learning resource centre, (iii) whether the works in the training workshop were commenced and completed prior to obtaining the required Building Warrant under the Building (Scotland) Act 1959 as amended and (iv) whether the cost of construction of the learning resource centre per square meter was in line with the national average costs expected for such work.
Answer
No. The Scottish Further Education Funding Council is assisting Inverness College to review its current activities, income and expenditure, on the basis of which the College is preparing a plan to recover its financial situation and to eliminate the accumulated deficit.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 02 March 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jack McConnell on 31 March 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will announce details of the funding available under the "Modernising Government" initiative and whether this funding will be available to (a) small businesses (b) the voluntary sector (c) The Family Association for Children with Extra-Special Needs (d) other voluntary bodies and (e) national park areas.
Answer
I announced the establishment of the 拢25 million Modernising Government Fund during the parliamentary debate on modernising government on 23 February. Applications for funds will be invited from a wide range of public sector bodies, including Scottish Executive departments and agencies, health authorities, non-departmental public bodies and local government authorities. Bids will be accepted from bodies which include a partnership with others whether they are in the public, private or voluntary sectors, where the public sector body is the lead partner.Full details of the bidding criteria will be issued in the next few weeks.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 03 March 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 31 March 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what criteria were used in determining the allocation of (a) public funds, whether from Scottish Natural Heritage or other sources and (b) funding from the National Heritage Lottery Fund to the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds.
Answer
The allocation of public funds to RSPB by Scottish Natural Heritage is made on exactly the same criteria as for any other applicant. Applications for funding are subject to a detailed assessment process, the key criterion of which is that the project for which funds are being sought should contribute to SNH's policy objectives and priorities.
The Scottish Executive gives a grant to RSPB for work connected with the prevention and detection of wildlife crime in addition to several small payments amounting to some 拢2,620. These small payments are contributions towards work undertaken by the RSPB at the behest of the Executive or one of its working groups established to consider specific policy issues such as the Scottish Biodiversity Group. The main criterion used for any payments made to the RSPB is if the work undertaken is consistent with the policies of the Executive or the relevant working group.With regard to the allocation of funds from the National Heritage Lottery Fund, this is a matter for them.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 14 March 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 30 March 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether any studies have been carried out as to the effect on local traders of bus corridors.
Answer
The Scottish Executive recently commissioned a research project entitled
A Comparative Evaluation of Greenways and Conventional Bus Lanes. This research focuses on bus corridors in Edinburgh and includes a section on Business Frontage Interviews. The project was concluded recently and its findings should be published later in the spring. A copy will be placed in SPICe.
I understand that Glasgow City Council have carried out studies on the effect of bus lanes on the Victoria Road/Gorbals Street bus corridor. This involved a survey of public opinion and before and after surveys of retail unit occupancy.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 16 March 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alasdair Morrison on 30 March 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive which of the proposals or plans of the Kinlochleven Land Development Trust it supports and which it opposes, and what impact the plans will have in providing new employment for those who may be made redundant from British Alcan.
Answer
I refer Mr Ewing to my answer to question S1W-5404. The projects being undertaken by the Kinlochleven Land Development Trust (KLDT) are an operational matter for the Trust, the community and for those agencies which are providing financial support for the regeneration programme, and do not require the approval of the Scottish Executive.
The significant regeneration activity taking place in Kinlochleven by the KLDT is being carried out with a view to creating more jobs for the sake of the future viability of the village.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 16 March 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 30 March 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will extend to all tenant farmers within the crofting counties the rights available to crofters under (a) the present crofting legislation and (b) crofting legislation under consideration.
Answer
No. As I announced in reply to Mike Watson on 19 November, I have closely examined the pros and cons of various proposals for tenant farmer right to buy and came to the conclusion that none are the right way forward.
Specifically, I am not persuaded that the crofter right to buy and the other benefits of crofting tenure should be extended to all tenant farmers in the crofting counties. The substantial costs of this, and in particular the cost of compensation to landlords, are a major factor in that decision.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 16 March 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alasdair Morrison on 30 March 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what efforts have been and will be made to attract employment to Kinlochleven.
Answer
When Alcan announced in 1994 that the aluminium smelter at Kinlochleven would close by 2000, the Kinlochleven Working Group was established (subsequently known as the Kinlochleven Implementation Team). The group comprised all the relevant agencies and the community and produced the strategy for the regeneration of the village.
To implement this strategy the Kinlochleven Land Development Trust (KLDT) was formed in 1995-96. The trust is a company limited by guarantee with charitable status which has taken over lease of the land from Alcan.
To date the KLDT has spent 拢3.5 million on a number of Phase One regeneration plans for the village. This includes the decontamination of the Bunker Buildings, the establishment of four business pavilions, the undertaking of environmental renewal work and the implementation of the footpath training scheme. Furthermore, approximately thirty full time jobs have been created between the opening of Database Direct's distributed call centre and the new bunkhouse.
The proposals for Phase Two are still at an early stage. KLDT has met on several occasions with Alcan employees and the Community Council to review the Phase Two plans. Market research is being carried out by Lochaber Limited/Highlands and Islands Enterprise for KLDT on the viability of the proposals.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 16 March 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Wendy Alexander on 30 March 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what steps it has taken and proposes to take to tackle social exclusion in Kinlochleven, particularly in relation to the incidence of nuisance and anti-social behaviour.
Answer
Measures to tackle neighbour nuisance and anti-social behaviour were introduced under the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, including Anti-social Behaviour Orders, new grounds for eviction for anti-social behaviour and additional powers for the police to seize noise-making equipment. Detailed guidance was issued to local authorities. The Executive's discussion paper, Housing and Anti-social Behaviour - The Way Ahead, published in December 1999 sets out the Executive's proposals for legislative and non-legislative action to tackle nuisance and anti-social behaviour. Comments on that paper are currently being analysed.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 16 March 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Home Robertson on 30 March 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what its estimate is for the grey and common seal population (a) over each of the last 30 years and (b) each of the next 30 years.
Answer
The estimates of grey seal populations in Scottish waters from 1984-98 shown in the table below are based on annual surveys of breeding colonies in the Outer Hebrides, Inner Hebrides, Orkney, the Isle of May and two English sites. The Scottish population figures have been arrived at by deducting the proportion of the population related to the two English sites. They are a consistent series calculated from a model that derives estimates of pup production from aerial survey counts and a model that estimates the size of the population required to produce these pups. An estimated additional 8,900 animals are associated with breeding sites that are not surveyed annually.
Pup surveys prior to 1984 did not include the Inner Hebrides. For these years, in the table below, the population estimates given are the product of the pup production estimate for the surveyed areas and the mean ratio of total population to pup production for these same areas from 1984 to 1998.
Year | Estimated Scottish Population to the Nearest 500 animals (aged 1 year and over) | | Year | Estimated Scottish population to the Nearest 500 animals (aged 1 year and over) |
1970 | 29,000 | | 1986 | 47,500 |
1971-1973 | No Surveys | | 1987 | 50,500 |
1974 | 32,000 | | 1988 | 54,500 |
1975 | 34,000 | | 1989 | 58,000 |
1976 | 35,500 | | 1990 | 61,500 |
1977 | No Survey | | 1991 | 65,000 |
1978 | 33,500 | | 1992 | 69,000 |
1979 | 36,500 | | 1993 | 73,500 |
1980 | 42,500 | | 1994 | 78,500 |
1981 | 44,000 | | 1995 | 83,500 |
1982 | 44,000 | | 1996 | 89,500 |
1983 | No Survey | | 1997 | 95,000 |
1984 | 41,500 | | 1998 | 101,500 |
1985 | 44,500 | | | |
Predictions about future population size are very difficult to make and are dependent on a number of assumptions. Two alternative predictions for grey seal numbers over the next five years are contained in the report Scientific Advice on Matters Related to the Management of Seal Populations: 1999, a copy of which is held in SPICe. Because of uncertainty about future changes in pup production, it is not meaningful to predict population size any further into the future than this.
Surveys of common seals between 1974 and 1980 were carried out from boats during the breeding season (June/July). Surveys since 1988 were by helicopter using a thermal imaging camera and were carried out during the August moult when the greatest and most consistent numbers of seals are thought to haul out. The numbers in the table below are counts of seals hauled out on land and represent minimum estimates of the population. A significant proportion of common seals will be at sea even during this period and it is therefore much more difficult to be precise about the total population based on these minimum figures.
Year |
1974-1980 (Boat survey) | 1988-1994 (Helicopter) | 1996-1997 (Helicopter) |
Adults Pups | Adults | Adults |
9,328 1,495 | 26,667 | 29,600 |
The increases between boat and helicopter survey results are partly due to the extension of the area surveyed by helicopter (successive surveys have covered larger areas), partly due to the change in methodology (up to twice as many seals may be detected when surveying by helicopter compared with boats), partly due to the different timing of surveys (seals spend more time hauled out during the August moult than during the June/July breeding season), and presumably also partly as a result of the cessation of harvesting, particularly in Shetland and Orkney. At present, we cannot say how the trend in numbers counted at haul-out sites relates to trends in population size.
The total Scottish population cannot be estimated accurately but is currently thought to be between 43,000-52,000 animals. There is insufficient information to allow future predictions of numbers of common seals to be made.