³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ

Around £35 million in non-domestic rate income is raised from each 1 pence of the poundage rate. Reducing the poundage rate by 3.4p from the current rate of 47.8p to 44.4p, would cost around £120 million (3.4p x £35 million). This would be a recurring cost.

I have asked Mr Bob Millar, Chief Executive of Communities Scotland to respond. His response is as follows:The Executive has not undertaken any research on the Norwegian Government's policy of providing a level of loan for housing based on the meeting of certain criteria, such as providing benefits to the environment, and has no plans at present for the introduction of such loans.

Through the Community Safety Partnership Award Programme we have provided Highland Wellbeing Alliance Community Safety Partnership with £139,500 in 2002-03 and £136,734 in 2003-04 to identify and address community safety priorities. To engage communities, this partnership operate a small grants scheme for local initiatives, involving annual expenditure of roughly £50,000. We do not hold detailed information on these awards but are aware that up to end January 2003 the following 14 initiatives, which appear to be based in the Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber constituency or act on the wider Highland area, benefited from awards under this scheme:SAFE KIDS Coalition for training and awareness raisingAviemore Detached Youth WorkerSafe Tourist Pack - joint initiative aimed at visitors to HighlandAlness New Community School anti-bullying projectNo Excuses Smoke Alarm Project for older people in LochaberKLB Youth Project in KinlochbervieLochaber Grinders Skate ParkHighland Ethnic Minorities GroupPositive Steps - Home Safety checkSocial Firm Development GroupYoung Driver Awareness Campaign in Badenoch and StrathspeyHome Start Ross and CromartyNairn Dog Fouling CampaignCharleston Academy School Bus Safety.

Ministers recognise that it is important to visit all parts of Scotland in the course of their ministerial duties. Records of ministerial engagements remain accessible during the parliamentary session. These are not collated by constituency visited and there are no plans to do so in future. All requests for meetings by ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ are considered by ministers, although records are not collated in the format requested.

Powers of direction vary from body to body. There is a wide range of terminology used in statute to describe directions that can be given to NDPBs. The power is normally contained in each body's establishing legislation or other founding framework documentation. These provisions give ministers a power to issue to an NDPB directions of a general or specific nature. Alternatively or in addition, statute may give ministers the power to issue directions on matters such as the form in which an NDPB must draw up its accounts or on what the NDPB must do to ensure the delivery of an EU obligation.The provision and application of such powers, is and can be interpreted in many ways. This flexibility is desirable in order to reflect the differing nature and individual status of the wide range of NDPBs and also to maintain positive relationships between bodies and ministers. In practice it is for each NDPB sponsor division within the Executive and solicitors to interpret what action(s) might qualify as a direction, taking into account the circumstances of the body and the scope of the power, and offer advice to ministers accordingly.Any decision for a minister to write to an NDPB in such terms may be considered to form part of the normal day to day operational responsibilities which ministers hold in relation to accountability and governance of NDPBs. Such responsibilities are an essential aspect of the well defined arms length relationship between NDPBs and ministers. The use of powers of direction is not recorded separately in every case. The information requested is, therefore, not held centrally in a way which would allow the provision of a comprehensive list.

I refer the member to the answer given to question S2W-530 today. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at .

The independent Performance Audit Group has confirmed that BEAR Scotland Ltd has complied with the specifications for ground maintenance.

I refer the member to the answer given to question S2W-503 today. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at .

The Scottish Scallop Advisory Committee, which includes Scottish Executive Environment and Rural Affairs Department, Food Standards Agency Scotland, Fisheries Research Services and representatives of the scallop industry in its membership, is presently developing options for research relating to amnesic shellfish poisoning in scallops. I would be happy to write to the member, and to the Rural Development Committee, once research has been commissioned.

I indicated to the Rural Development Committee in December 2002 that I would postpone any decision on technical conservation measures for scallops until I had received the ECODREDGE report. I will be reporting to Parliament shortly with my decision.