- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 02 April 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 29 April 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S3W-22033 by John Swinney on 27 March 2009, what the energy performance certificate grade was of each of the 78 buildings referred to.聽
Answer
Legislation on the energy performance of buildings was introduced under the Energy Performance of Buildings (Scotland) Regulations 2008 as a result of an EU Directive. This legislation came into force for existing buildings on 4 January 2009. Energy performance certificates are therefore not required for buildings subject to new leases or renewal of existing leases prior to that date.
The Scottish Government, however, recognises its leadership role for the wider public sector and we will be working to produce EPCs for the main buildings on our core estate during 2009. This approach will mean that the Scottish Government has gone beyond the minimum statutory requirements, underlying its commitment to leading by example.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 02 April 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 29 April 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S3W-22032 by John Swinney on 27 March 2009, what the energy performance certificate grade was of each of the six buildings referred to.聽
Answer
Legislation on the energy performance of buildings was introduced under the Energy Performance of Buildings (Scotland) Regulations 2008 as a result of an EU Directive. This legislation came into force for existing buildings on 4 January 2009. I refer the member to my answer S3W-22032 that notes no new leasing arrangements or renewals were entered into by Core Scottish Executive over 2007 and 2008. Energy performance certificates are therefore not required.
The Scottish Government, however, recognises its leadership role for the wider public sector and we will be working to produce Energy Performance Certificates for the main buildings on our core estate during 2009. This approach will mean that the Scottish Government has gone beyond the minimum statutory requirements, underlying its commitment to leading by example.
All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament''s website, the search facility for which can be found at .
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 22 April 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 29 April 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive which of the issues in relation to antisocial behaviour and the licensing process for houses in multiple occupation highlighted by Sarah Boyack MSP in her speech on the antisocial behaviour framework on 2 April 2009 (Official Report c. 16538) it considers need to be addressed and what action it envisages taking to address them.
Answer
In her speech on 2 April 2009, Sarah Boyack MSP referred to an alleged loophole in the licensing process for houses in multiple occupation (HMOs), because that regulatory regime does not cover short-term lets, in which antisocial behaviour may take place.
HMOs are required to be licensed primarily to ensure they meet standards designed to protect their residents from the risks of living in this type of accommodation. In order to obtain a licence, the owner of the property may, for example, be required to carry out alterations to the property to make it suitable to be the home of the relevant number of occupants.
As the Scottish Government has previously made clear, we have concerns about the position of tenants in multiply-occupied short-term lets, who may be living and working in Scotland, but are excluded from the protection of HMO licensing because landlords claim that the property is not the only or principal residence of the occupants. This particularly affects migrant workers. We will discuss with stakeholders the possibility of including such short-term lets in licensing, in order to extend to such tenants the protection it affords. Landlords of these properties are already required to register with local authorities.
We have no plans to extend HMO licensing to holiday accommodation, where the occupants are merely visiting an area, not living and working there. Such regulation would have a considerable impact on the tourism sector. Under antisocial behaviour legislation, local authorities have powers to deal with antisocial behaviour in such premises, including issuing on the spot fines and seizing noise-making equipment.
The implications of including any category of property within HMO licensing go far beyond issues relating to antisocial behaviour and it would not be appropriate to extend HMO licensing to any category of accommodation solely to address such issues.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 22 April 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 29 April 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S3W-22158 by Alex Neil on 19 March 2009, what it would define as a genuine holiday let.
Answer
Within the context of the licensing of houses in multiple occupation, if there were to be any changes to the definition of a licensable property, a legal definition of a holiday let would be drafted if that proved necessary to distinguish such a property from licensable properties. If such a definition proved to be necessary, we expect that it would reflect the distinction between properties occupied by tenants who are living and working in an area and those occupied by people who are visiting an area for a short period for the purposes of a holiday.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 20 April 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 29 April 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive when it will announce the qualifying criteria for the energy efficiency programme agreed in the 2009 budget.
Answer
During his Budget speech on 4 February 2009, the Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Sustainable Growth announced proposals for the first stage of an ambitious area based Home Insulation Scheme supported by 拢15 million of new government funding in 2009-10 plus 拢15 million from other sources. Since then, the Scottish Government has been working with stakeholders, including COSLA, to finalise details of the scheme and announcements will follow in due course.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 24 March 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 27 April 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive what representations it has received identifying a loophole in the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982 (Licensing of Houses in Multiple Occupation) Order 2000 relating to problems being experienced by residents and communities in Edinburgh as a result of holiday lets.
Answer
We have received letters from three Members of the Scottish Parliament claiming that there is a loophole in the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982 (Licensing of Houses in Multiple Occupation) Order 2000, in that the regulatory regime established by that Order does not cover holiday lets.
In fact, the system of licensing of houses in multiple occupation is a regulatory regime with conditions designed to protect tenants whose principal or only residence is a multiply-occupied house. The legislation was not designed to cover holiday lets.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 24 March 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Mather on 23 April 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it wrote to representatives of Community Service Volunteers to make them aware of the changes to funding for the voluntary sector and, if so, when.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S3W-17400 on 11 November 2008. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament''s website, the search facility for which can be found at .
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 24 March 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Mather on 23 April 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether representatives of Community Service Volunteers agreed to changes to funding for the voluntary sector.
Answer
The concordat with local authorities reinforces the principle that local delivery decisions should be made locally to ensure the delivery of local outcome agreement. Third sector organisations such as Community Service Volunteers can make a contribution to delivering single outcome agreements by engaging with community planning partnerships and local authorities.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 24 March 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Mather on 23 April 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will publish the (a) dates and (b) minutes of the meetings it had with representatives of Community Service Volunteers regarding changes to funding for the voluntary sector.
Answer
A three year grant to Community Service Volunteers for its Retired and Senior Volunteers Programme came to its planned and expected conclusion at the end of March.
On 5 February 2009, I met the Director Scotland and a board member of CSV to discuss the contribution it could make to advancing volunteering. Officials from the Third Sector Division met representatives of CSV on 24 November 2008 and 2 February 2009 to discuss their request for a further grant for its Retired and Senior Volunteers programme, which matches volunteers to local projects. No minutes were taken of these meetings.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 24 March 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Mather on 23 April 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether discussions have taken place with representatives of Community Service Volunteers to make them aware of the changes to funding for the voluntary sector.
Answer
A three year grant to Community Service Volunteers for its Retired and Senior Volunteers Programme came to its planned and expected conclusion at the end of March. Various discussions have taken place over the last nine months or so at official and ministerial level about the possibility of a further grant, which is not possible under the new arrangements for funding local projects by local authorities.