- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 27 January 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 3 February 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive what assessment has been made of the impact on client groups of the withdrawal of Fairer Scotland funding from the Capital City Partnership.
Answer
The Scottish Government has not withdrawn Fairer Scotland Funding from the Capital City Partnership. The Community Planning Partnership for Edinburgh, The Edinburgh Partnership, was awarded 拢22.798 million from the Fairer Scotland Fund from 2008-11 to work together to tackle area-based and individual poverty, and to help more people access and sustain employment opportunities. The ring fence from the Fairer Scotland Fund (FSF) was removed in 2010-11 to provide local partners with increased flexibility in how to use resources to tackle local priorities. The regeneration resources associated with the former FSF have been retained and maintained within the 2011-12 local government finance settlement.
In addition the Scottish Government has been able to maintain the overall share of the budget for local government at 34.5%, the same as 2010-11.
It is for local partners to consider the impact of investment decisions on client groups.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 27 January 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 3 February 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive when the decision was made to withdraw Fairer Scotland Funding from the Capital City Partnership.
Answer
The Scottish Government has not withdrawn Fairer Scotland Funding (FSF) from the Capital City Partnership. The Community Planning Partnership for Edinburgh, The Edinburgh Partnership, was awarded 拢22.798 million from the Fairer Scotland Fund from 2008-11 to work together to tackle area-based and individual poverty, and to help more people access and sustain employment opportunities. The ring fence from the Fairer Scotland Fund (FSF) was removed in 2010-11 to provide local partners with increased flexibility in how to use resources to tackle local priorities. The regeneration resources associated with the former FSF have been retained and maintained within the 2011-12 local government finance settlement.
The decision to end the additional support that the Edinburgh Partnership received to address the strategic priorities for Edinburgh in respect of community regeneration, tackling poverty and improving employability was taken in December 2010.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 27 January 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 3 February 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive what consultation was carried out with the service providers involved in delivering training to people eligible for assistance before the decision was taken to withdraw Fairer Scotland Funding from the Capital City Partnership.
Answer
The Scottish Government has not withdrawn Fairer Scotland Funding (FSF) from the Capital City Partnership. The Community Planning Partnership for Edinburgh, The Edinburgh Partnership, was awarded 拢22.798 million from the Fairer Scotland Fund from 2008-11 to work together to tackle area-based and individual poverty, and to help more people access and sustain employment opportunities. The ring fence from the Fairer Scotland Fund (FSF) was removed in 2010-11 to provide local partners with increased flexibility in how to use resources to tackle local priorities. The regeneration resources associated with the former FSF have been retained and maintained within the 2011-12 local government finance settlement.
In addition the Scottish Government has been able to maintain the overall share of the budget for local government at 34.5%, the same as 2010-11.
Any consultation on future funding for local projects is the responsibility of local partners.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 27 January 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 3 February 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will reconsider its decision to withdraw Fairer Scotland funding from the Capital City Partnership.
Answer
We will be working with the Capital City Partnership to explore alternative measures for funding projects.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 27 January 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 3 February 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive how much funding was provided through the Fairer Scotland Fund for employability programmes in each local authority area in 2009-10 and is provided in 2010-11.
Answer
Allocations of the Fairer Scotland Fund to each local authority area for 2009 and 2010-11 are as follows.
Local Authority Area | Funding in 2009-10 | Funding in 2010-11 |
(拢 Million) | (拢 Million) |
Aberdeen City | 2.481 | 2.843 |
Aberdeenshire | 1.038 | 1.286 |
Angus | 0.988 | 1.24 |
Argyll and Bute | 0.965 | 1.104 |
Clackmannanshire | 2.043 | 2.263 |
Dumfries and Galloway | 1.634 | 1.694 |
Dundee City | 8.286 | 8.131 |
East Ayrshire | 4.621 | 4.589 |
East Dunbartonshire | 0.523 | 0.621 |
East Lothian | 0.413 | 0.546 |
East Renfrewshire | 0.575 | 0.526 |
Edinburgh, City of | 7.599 | 7.554 |
Eilean Siar | 0.545 | 0.5 |
Falkirk | 1.955 | 2.212 |
Fife | 4.692 | 5.675 |
Glasgow City | 51.491 | 51.969 |
Highland | 1.959 | 2.354 |
Inverclyde | 6.125 | 5.78 |
Midlothian | 0.718 | 0.817 |
Moray | 0.422 | 0.5 |
North Ayrshire | 5.427 | 5.258 |
North Lanarkshire | 14.339 | 13.19 |
Orkney Islands | 0.345 | 0.5 |
Perth and Kinross | 0.847 | 1.2 |
Renfrewshire | 6.348 | 5.654 |
Scottish Borders | 0.527 | 0.739 |
Shetland Islands | 0.348 | 0.5 |
South Ayrshire | 1.452 | 1.67 |
South Lanarkshire | 8.164 | 6.117 |
Stirling | 0.752 | 0.906 |
West Dunbartonshire | 5.507 | 5.067 |
West Lothian | 1.88 | 1.993 |
Total | 145 | 145 |
It is for each Community Planning Partnership to decide the balance of investment between tackling area-based and individual poverty, and helping more people access and sustain employment opportunities.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 27 January 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 3 February 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive when the Capital City Partnership was first informed that Fairer Scotland Funding would cease.
Answer
The Scottish Government has not withdrawn Fairer Scotland Funding from the Capital City Partnership. The Community Planning Partnership for Edinburgh, The Edinburgh Partnership, was awarded 拢22.798 million from the Fairer Scotland Fund from 2008-11 to work together to tackle area-based and individual poverty, and to help more people access and sustain employment opportunities. The ring fence from the Fairer Scotland Fund (FSF) was removed in 2010-11 to provide local partners with increased flexibility in how to use resources to tackle local priorities. The regeneration resources associated with the former FSF have been retained and maintained within the 2011-12 local government finance settlement.
The Minister for Housing and Communities, Alex Neil, wrote to Councillor Tom Buchanan at City of Edinburgh Council on 21 December 2010 informing him that the Scottish Government were unable to continue additional dedicated central government support to the Edinburgh Partnership.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 27 January 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 3 February 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive what assessment has been made of the impact on Edinburgh鈥檚 Joined Up for Jobs Strategy of the withdrawal of Fairer Scotland funding from the Capital City Partnership.
Answer
The Scottish Government has not withdrawn Fairer Scotland Funding from the Capital City Partnership. The Community Planning Partnership for Edinburgh, The Edinburgh Partnership, was awarded 拢22.798 million from the Fairer Scotland Fund from 2008-11 to work together to tackle area-based and individual poverty, and to help more people access and sustain employment opportunities. The ring fence from the Fairer Scotland Fund (FSF) was removed in 2010-11 to provide local partners with increased flexibility in how to use resources to tackle local priorities. The regeneration resources associated with the former FSF have been retained and maintained within the 2011-12 local government finance settlement.
In addition, the Scottish Government has been able to maintain the overall share of the budget for local government at 34.5%, the same as 2010-11.
It is for local partners to consider how to deliver the Joined up for Jobs Strategy and the impact of any funding changes to that.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 13 January 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 26 January 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive what correspondence it has had, or intends to have, with the European Commission regarding the potential for the planned growth of marine renewables to affect special areas of conservation and European protected species.
Answer
The Scottish Government regularly contributes to discussions with the European Commission, UK Government and EU member states on marine renewables and offshore wind energy issues. It contributed to the development of recently published EU Guidance on Wind Energy Developments and Natura 2000 and is represented on several UK groups including the UK Renewable Energy Deployment Environmental Issue Board.
There has been no specific correspondence so far with the European Commission, UK Government and EU member states regarding the potential for marine renewable projects to affect special areas of conservation and European protected species. However, ongoing work on Habitats Regulation Appraisals and other environmental assessments provide the basis for consideration of these issues and discussions with relevant countries and the European Commission where necessary.
The EU Guidance on Wind Energy Developments and Natura 2000 can be found via the following link .
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 13 January 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 26 January 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the Scottish Marine and Freshwater Science Volume 1 No 18: Further Scottish Leasing Round (Saltire Prize Projects): Regional Locational Guidance published by Marine Scotland Science will be a material consideration in the determination of applications for relevant energy development made under the Electricity Act 1989.
Answer
The Scottish Government does consider that the document referred to will be a material consideration in the determination of applications for relevant energy development made under the Electricity Act 1989.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 13 January 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 26 January 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it considers that a habitats regulations assessment of the Scottish Marine and Freshwater Science Volume 1 No 18: Further Scottish Leasing Round (Saltire Prize Projects): Regional Locational Guidance published by Marine Scotland Science is required and what the reasons are for its position on this matter.
Answer
The purpose of this report is to collate baseline information relevant to the development process, to assist developers interested in competing for the Saltire Prize to identify and develop projects rapidly. As its primary purpose is the provision of baseline information, it is not considered to be a qualifying plan or project under the Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c.) Regulations 1994, as amended for Scotland, which implement the EC Habitats Directive.