- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 04 February 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 27 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how many projects funded by the Freight Facilities Grant (FFG) are directly linked to the development of intermodal transport facilities, and what the expected benefits of these developments are.
Answer
Detailed below is a table containing Freight Facilities Grant awards linked to the development of intermodal transport facilities with the commodities that were removed from being transported by container from road onto rail or water instead.
Award | Commodities Moved by Rail or Water Instead of by Road | Mode of Transport |
Russells Transport, Hillington. | Food, scrap metal and alcohol. | Rail. |
Safeway Stores Mossend, Inverness, Nairn Elgin, Buckie. | Groceries. | Rail. |
Safeway Stores Mossend, Thurso, Wick, Kirkwall and Ullapool. | Groceries. | Rail. |
WH Malcolm Ltd, Grangemouth. | Glass and alcohol. | Rail. |
Forth Ports. | General cargo. | Water. |
Asda Stores, Grangemouth. | Groceries. | Rail. |
WH Malcolm Ltd, Phase 2 at Grangemouth | Rubber and alcohol. | Rail. |
WH Malcolm Ltd, Phase 3, Grangemouth to Aberdeen. | Paper and groceries. | Rail. |
WH Malcolm, Phase 4, Elderslie. | General cargo. | Rail. |
WH Malcolm Phase 5, Kirkby Thore to Elderslie. | Plasterboard. | Rail. |
Eddie Stobart (Tesco), Daventry to Grangemouth. | Groceries. | Rail. |
Eddie Stobart, Grangemouth, Inverness | Groceries. | Rail. |
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 04 February 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 27 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how the Freight Facilities Grant (FFG) contributes to the reduction of carbon emissions in Scotland, and what quantifiable impact has been recorded in terms of emissions reductions from FFG-funded projects in each year since 2021.
Answer
The Freight Facilities Grants (FFG) is intended to bring about a number of benefits from the removal of freight from roads to other modes of transport. This includes but is not limited to emissions reduction.
The impact of Freight Facility Grant awards is measured in terms of the number and distance of road vehicle miles displaced onto other forms of transport. As the emissions impact will vary depending on the type of vehicle, the duty cycle and other factors, this is not recorded separately.
To date, Freight Facility Grant awards have resulted in the reduction of over 50 million heavy goods vehicle miles on Scotland’s roads.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 04 February 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 27 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether the Freight Facilities Grant (FFG) has supported projects aimed at improving the efficiency of inland waterways and, if so, which projects have been funded.
Answer
Since the introduction of Freight Facilities Grant in 1997, the Scottish Government has received no applications for an inland waterways project.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 05 February 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 27 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how many signs are located along the (a) A82, (b) A828, (c) A83, (d) A835, (e) A85, (f) A86, (g) A87, (h) A887, (i) A889, (j) A9, (k) A95, (l) A96 and (m) A99, and what proportion does not meet current standards for visibility and effectiveness, broken down by Category (i) 1 and (ii) 2 defects.
Answer
Category 1 defects are defined within the term maintenance contract as those that present, or could present, an immediate hazard to trunk road users. They are typically detected during the twice weekly driven safety related inspections. Category 2 defects are defined as those which do not present an immediate hazard to road users and are typically identified during walked annual inspections.
The following table contains the number of signs on the routes requested along with the number of signs with open defects of all types as at 12 February 2025.
| Number of signs | Category 1 defects | Category 2 defects |
A82 | 5517 | 17 | 1600 |
A828 | 971 | 3 | 87 |
A83 | 2050 | 9 | 711 |
A835 | 1033 | 0 | 239 |
A85 | 3028 | 2 | 958 |
A86 | 1545 | 2 | 339 |
A87 | 2341 | 3 | 481 |
A887 | 188 | 0 | 67 |
A889 | 289 | 0 | 153 |
A9 | 6062 | 18 | 1374 |
A95 | 1157 | 0 | 84 |
A96 | 3064 | 18 | 274 |
A99 | 430 | 2 | 63 |
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 05 February 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 27 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how many signs located along the (a) A82, (b) A828, (c) A83, (d) A835, (e) A85, (f) A86, (g) A87, (h) A887, (i) A889, (j) A9, (k) A95, (l) A96 and (m) A99 that were categorised as having a Category 1 defect did not receive a temporary or permanent repair by 6.00 am on the day following identification, in each year since 2021.
Answer
Transport Scotland’s Operating Companies are required to either repair or make safe Category 1 sign defects within 24 hours of detection. The following table provides the number of Category 1 sign related defects that were not recorded as either repaired or made safe within 24 hours.
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
A82 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
A828 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A83 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
A835 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A85 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A86 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
A87 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
A887 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A889 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A9 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
A95 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
A96 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
A99 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 04 February 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 27 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how the Freight Facilities Grant (FFG) contributes to its efforts to reduce road freight traffic, and what impact this has had on (a) road congestion and (b) air quality.
Answer
Since 1997, Freight Facilities Grants have removed over 50 million lorry miles from Scotland's roads. The exact impact on road congestion and air quality of each project cannot be confidently described due to the effect of other local influences on transport demand.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 04 February 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 27 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what proportion of Freight Facilities Grant (FFG) funding has been allocated to projects that aim to improve rail freight infrastructure, and how this compares to funding for road and maritime projects.
Answer
A total of £70,443,984 has been allocated through the Freight Facilities Grant (FFG) since its introduction in 1997. Of this the spend on rail projects was £44,708,510, or 63% of the FFG budget. The spend on water projects was £25,735,474 which equates to 37% of the budget.
During the period 2022-23 to 2024-25, the Scottish Government invested over £2.8 billion on trunk road safety, adaptations, maintenance and improvement. The Scottish Parliament agreed in principle on 6 February 2025 to invest nearly £1.1 billion to ensure the trunk road network is well maintained and enhanced, and progress major road projects, including duelling the A9 and improving the A83.
Ports in Scotland are mostly independent statutory bodies – each governed by their own local legislation – and are deemed commercial entities. Therefore, the Scottish Government has no say in the day-to-day running of their business, nor can it dictate business decisions made by a company on how to best utilise its resources. This remains the responsibility of the port authority.
There are no Scottish Government funding options specifically for the commercial maritime sector. However, as commercial businesses, Scottish Enterprise can provide advice about what options could be available for private / public co-investment to develop port infrastructure. The Scottish Government and its agencies have supported a number of maritime proposals across Scotland, including large scale developments at Aberdeen and Stornoway, and through the Green Freeport initiatives at Inverness, Cromarty Firth and Forth Ports.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 04 February 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 27 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how it monitors the long-term efficacy of projects funded through the Freight Facilities Grant (FFG).
Answer
Traffic monitoring is undertaken after a facility funded under the grant scheme becomes operational.
Transport Scotland requires applicants to provide a return of traffic passing through the grant-aided facility. Transport Scotland will require verified tonnages reports from the applicant, in cases where the applicant is required to provide evidence to corroborate the traffic the documentation required will be agreed prior to the award of grant.
Monitoring will cover an agreed period of time to allow the required environmental benefits from the grant to be accrued by the applicant.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 04 February 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 27 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what steps it is taking to ensure that the Freight Facilities Grant (FFG) supports projects in both urban and rural areas equally.
Answer
Any company, in either a rural or urban area, which wants to move freight by rail or water rather than by road and which is proposing to invest in new freight handling facilities in Scotland or re-invest in existing facilities in Scotland may apply for Freight Facilities Grant. All applications are treated on their merits.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 February 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ivan McKee on 27 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-34488 by Ivan McKee on 19 February 2025, whether it will provide the information that was requested regarding for what reason its partial island communities impact assessment (ICIA) for the Visitor Levy (Scotland) Bill did not recommend carrying out a full ICIA on the basis that the measures in the Bill were "not likely to have an effect on an island community which is significantly different from its effect on other communities", in light of the assessment also noting that "the geographical remoteness of islands can generate a number of particular challenges".
Answer
As set out in the answer to question S6W-34488, the responsibility of undertaking a full Island communities impact assessment is on local authorities. Additionally, Local authorities have the power to charge different rates and exemptions for different geographical areas. Each local authority has a responsibility to publish assessment of the impacts of introducing a Visitor Levy, and they have a statutory requirement to consult with local communities, businesses, and the public, prior to the introduction of a Visitor Levy.
We formed an Expert Group made up of key representatives from the tourism industry and local government, chaired by Visit Scotland. The Group developed Guidance for local authorities on introducing and administering a visitor levy. Chapter 18 of guidance published October 2024 has further details of what is required of local authorities when implicating a Visitor levy .