- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 22 May 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 5 June 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-25671 by Cathy Jamieson on 21 May 2002, what the criteria were for accessing the Special Educational Needs Innovation Grants Programme funding and in what ways Independent Special Education Advice failed to meet those criteria.
Answer
The following criteria and priorities were set out in the grant application pack:
- promoting inclusive policies in mainstream and special schools
- approaches to improving links, and sharing skills/expertise between special and mainstream schools
- empowering parents to enable them to participate fully in their children's education
- improving children's participation in decisions which affect them
- promoting integrated and co-ordinated approaches to service delivery (e.g. key worker role)
- offering new approaches to advice and resolution of disagreements between professionals and families
We are writing to those unsuccessful applicants who have requested feedback on their bids. This includes Independent Special Education Advice and a letter outlining the reasons for refusing funding was issued to them on Thursday 30 May.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 21 May 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 5 June 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how many speech therapists there have been in each NHS board area in (a) 1999-2000, (b) 2000-01, (c) 2001-02 and (d) 2002-03 to date.
Answer
The following table shows the latest centrally available data for headcount and whole-time equivalent of speech therapists by NHS board in Scotland:Speech Therapists in Scotland by NHS Board at 30 September
| Headcount | WTE |
1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001P | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001P |
Scotland | 824 | 844 | 887 | 882 | 686.4 | 708.1 | 744.4 | 739.6 |
Argyll and Clyde | 62 | 62 | 62 | 66 | 52.4 | 52.9 | 53.7 | 56.2 |
Ayrshire and Arran | 41 | 46 | 49 | 54 | 36.2 | 40.2 | 41.7 | 45.8 |
Borders | 18 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 15.5 | 16.0 | 16.7 | 17.2 |
Dumfries and Galloway | 25 | 28 | 26 | 29 | 22.3 | 25.5 | 22.2 | 23.8 |
Fife | 63 | 46 | 67 | 50 | 49.4 | 37.9 | 51.6 | 40.1 |
Forth Valley | 42 | 46 | 53 | 54 | 34.1 | 36.5 | 43.5 | 43.3 |
Grampian | 94 | 101 | 101 | 96 | 70.9 | 78.3 | 78.9 | 74.4 |
Greater Glasgow | 139 | 147 | 155 | 156 | 122.6 | 128.1 | 136.3 | 137.6 |
Highland | 31 | 29 | 28 | 33 | 27.2 | 24.6 | 24.2 | 28.4 |
Lanarkshire | 104 | 107 | 100 | 102 | 94.5 | 95.4 | 89.7 | 90.3 |
Lothian | 133 | 138 | 148 | 143 | 100.4 | 109.2 | 117.9 | 112.9 |
Orkney | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.4 |
Shetland | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3.7 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 2.7 |
Tayside | 58 | 64 | 66 | 66 | 48.7 | 53.4 | 56.6 | 57.3 |
Western Isles | 6 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5.8 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 |
PProvisionalNote:1. These data are released under National Manpower Statistics from Payroll.2. Whole-time equivalent (WTE) is calculated by dividing the number of contracted hours by the conditioned hours for the group of staff.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 21 May 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 5 June 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what the current average time is from GP referral to the first consultation with a neurologist in respect of a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease in each NHS board area.
Answer
The information requested is not held centrally. Data on waiting times for a first out-patient appointment with a consultant is collected at speciality level only. The median waiting times for a first out-patient appointment with a consultant in Neurology, following referral by a General Medical Practitioner, in the year ending 31 December 2001, by NHS board of residence, is given in the table.NHSScotland: Median Waiting Times for a First Out-patient Appointment with a Consultant in Neurology, Following Referral by a General Medical Practitioner, by NHS Board of Residence. Year Ending 31 December 2001
PNHS Board | Median Wait |
Argyll and Clyde | 80 days |
Ayrshire and Arran | 97 days |
Borders | 78 days |
Dumfries and Galloway | 101 days |
Fife | 66 days |
Forth Valley | 70 days |
Grampian | 88 days |
Greater Glasgow | 95 days |
Highland | 59 days |
Lanark | 106 days |
Lothian | 28 days |
Orkney | 120 days |
Shetland | 97 days |
Tayside | 66 days |
Western Isles | 56 days |
Scotland | 69 days |
pProvisional.Source: ISD Scotland.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 21 May 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 5 June 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it plans to waive prescription charges for people with chronic disabling illnesses such as Parkinson's disease.
Answer
We have no plans to do so.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 20 May 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 5 June 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-25236 by Mr Jim Wallace on 3 May 2002, how it reconciles the answer with the evidence given by Michael Crossan, former deputy governor of Low Moss to the Justice 1 Committee on 14 May 2002 (Official Report col. 3544), that Eric Murch had prepared the report Constructing the Future.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:The Constructing the Future report bore the name of Eric Murch as he was governor of Low Moss at the time, but as stated by Mike Crossan it was prepared in conjunction with the management team at Low Moss.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 15 May 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Elish Angiolini on 5 June 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will list the types of costs the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service incur in the event of the adjournment of a trial (a) in advance and (b) on the date of the trial.
Answer
The adjournment of a trial on the date of the trial usually involves the payment of expenses to witnesses who have been inconvenienced. The adjournment of a trial at any time means that staff time in preparing for the trial (including administrative staff time in citing witnesses, arranging for productions to be in court and paper handling) has been wasted. The extent of that wasted expense depends on how long before the trial date it is known that there is to be an adjournment.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 15 May 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Elish Angiolini on 5 June 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service set criteria to indicate which cases should be sent to the district court and which are eligible for an alternative to prosecution and whether any such criteria will be placed in the Scottish Parliament Information Centre.
Answer
Procurators Fiscal are instructed that cases which may be competently taken in the district court should be taken there unless there is some good reason for prosecuting in the sheriff court or the Lord Advocate directs otherwise. The Lord Advocate has directed that: (a) proceedings should not be taken in the district court for a breach of a Sex Offenders Order, or any offence aggravated by a breach of a Sex Offender Order; (b) proceedings should not be taken in the district court where the prosecutor considers a Non-Harassment Order to be appropriate, and (c) proceeding should not be taken in the district court where the offence is racially aggravated or contrary to section 50A of the Criminal Law (Consolidated) (Scotland) Act 1995. The criteria for the use of alternatives to prosecution are set out in the Prosecution Code which has been published and made available on the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service website.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 15 May 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Elish Angiolini on 5 June 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-25069 by Colin Boyd on 29 April 2002, what steps it is taking to reduce the number of cases marked "no proceedings" as a result of delay by the procurator fiscal.
Answer
We are implementing the recommendations of the recent management review. Additional prosecutors have been recruited and structural changes are being made to improve the management support given to prosecutors.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 15 May 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Elish Angiolini on 5 June 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-25069 by Colin Boyd on 29 April 2002, what the reason is for the rise in the number of cases marked "no proceedings" as a result of delay by the procurator fiscal since 1998-99.
Answer
The proportion of these cases is very small, having risen from 205 to 451. There are likely to be a number of factors leading to this, including the need to devote resources to serious cases and other competing pressures on the time of Procurators Fiscal.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 15 May 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Elish Angiolini on 5 June 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what the reason is for the decline in the number and proportion of cases reported to the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service being sent to the district court since 1997-98.
Answer
The reduction in business in the district court is a consequence of the reduction in the overall number of cases reported to the procurator fiscal, the availability of fiscal fines and other alternatives to prosecution and the shift in the balance of business towards more serious crime.