The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1311 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2023
Jeremy Balfour
It was just over 30 years ago that I sweated blood and tears when trying to do company law. I am pleased to say that I have never practised it in my life.
However, I have had another look at the amendments in this group and had conversations about them, and I slightly disagree with the minister鈥檚 position. My view is that we need more clarity around the area of insolvency. It is, as the Law Commission has said, and as the minister has said this morning, very technical, and we should bring more clarity to very technical areas by including the amendments in the bill and enacting them. If the amendments do not achieve what I think that they will achieve, there is room to make changes at a later stage, as the minister has said. However, I think that the amendments would clarify the situation, and it is my intention to press amendment 58.
09:45Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I appreciate what the minister says, but if everything is fine, the review can be a very quick process. There is concern that we do not know how this will work in practice. I would have thought that having a more formal process of carrying out a review would give stakeholders the opportunity to have input into the process. If there is not, how do stakeholders go about having that input into how it works in practice?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 March 2023
Jeremy Balfour
You touched on this issue in one of your earlier answers to Pam Duncan-Glancy. The provisions in the bill that relate to charity mergers are restricted to legacies but, in England, the equivalent provisions relate to both legacies and gifts. Why have we not gone down that road, in order to allow both legacies and gifts to be included with regard to a merger?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 March 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I suppose that that would just make things clearer. It is not a negative thing; it seems to be positive. We might be able to look at it later.
My other couple of questions will be quick, as I am conscious of time. From all the evidence that we have taken, the requirement for charities to demonstrate a connection to Scotland seems to have received pretty welcoming support. Why does the bill not have an absolutely clear definition of what that means? Instead, it leaves it open to some interpretation. Is it too difficult to define legally? What was the reasoning behind that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 March 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you. That is helpful.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 March 2023
Jeremy Balfour
You will be aware that the Information Commissioner has raised some questions about data protection issues. Have those been addressed sufficiently in the bill or in related evidence, or does the bill need some tweaking?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 March 2023
Jeremy Balfour
A system whereby people could appeal to a tribunal was included in the 2005 act. That has now changed. My question arises from my own ignorance: does that tribunal still exist in law, and, if so, should we not remove it from the legislation?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 March 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Who would be liable if there was a breach: OSCR or the Scottish Government ?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 March 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you, cabinet secretary. That is helpful.
Obviously, I hope that this situation will not happen very often but, as we have heard from evidence in previous sessions, at the moment, there is a lack of people who are willing to volunteer to be trustees. It might be an issue for OSCR more than for you, but do you see OSCR as having a bank of people who are ready to step in if required? If not, how do you expect OSCR to find those people at fairly short notice?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 March 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I will move to the issue of interim trustees, which is something that OSCR can now deal with. If OSCR appoints an interim trustee, will that person be remunerated, or is it a voluntary role? If there are costs connected to that, is OSCR liable for those, or is that the charity鈥檚 liability?