The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1311 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Would the bill require further amendment?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
For the avoidance of doubt, I just want to say that one of the witnesses today, John McArthur, is a personal friend of mine from many years ago when I was a trainee with Anderson Strathern. Also, Alan Barr, who is on the second panel, was one of my lecturers at university.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
That is helpful.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I will pick up on a couple of those issues. Someone on the first panel made a suggestion about getting medical evidence. Do you think that a requirement to provide medical evidence would be helpful in giving protection to a trustee who has been challenged on that?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning. I thank all of you for coming to the meeting.
The bill contains some new powers for sheriff courts, but the Court of Session will remain the main court for trusts. Do you think that the balance is about right in that respect, or should more be done鈥攐r be allowed to be done鈥攊n the sheriff courts instead of things going to the Court of Session?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
How does that then relate鈥攐r does it relate at all鈥攖o the Charities (Regulation and Administration) (Scotland) Bill, under which the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator can appoint interim trustees if no trustees are capable of working? If a trustee needed to step down and they were incapable of doing that, would OSCR not temporarily appoint an interim trustee to keep the trust going?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I will move us on again. A trustee, as you will be aware, does not get to participate in trust decisions under section 12 when they are incapable. Trustees can also remove a fellow trustee from their role on the basis that the trustee is incapable. The risk of abuse of those provisions has been highlighted by the Law Society and other legal stakeholders. The academics who appeared before the committee last week were more relaxed about that possible risk. From more of a practitioner鈥檚 perspective, are you concerned about that or happy with it? Is there anything that you would want to add to the bill on that?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
A concern among last week鈥檚 panel, because the domicile rules could be unclear, was about what will happen when a foreign national sets up a trust then disappears to another country. In practice, are you dealing with that issue? The issue is to do with someone who is not domiciled in Scotland setting up a trust then running it from another jurisdiction.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Yes.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
The Faculty of Advocates and others have said that they think that the power in section 67 to give directions to the court needs to be much wider. I would be interested to get your views on that. Does the power need to be wider, or is the provision about right? Are you happy with the position as it is?