The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1311 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I welcome the witnesses to the meeting. For the avoidance of doubt, I declare that I am a member of the Church of Scotland, but I have no financial interests in that regard.
The bill includes new powers for sheriff courts, but the predominant power remains with the Court of Session. What are the pros and cons of that approach? In a previous evidence session, it was suggested that trustees should be able to decide whether their case goes to the sheriff court or the Court of Session, instead of that being prescribed. Does anyone have a view on that?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I was just following up on what had been said. Should the bill formally state that mediation or arbitration should take place before any court action is considered, or should that be covered in the guidance that is given on good practice?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Joan, I am interested in what you said in your opening statement about some trusts not being covered in this bill. You mentioned some of the gardens around Edinburgh. Can you tell me a bit more about why you think that they are not included?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
In what way do you see that happening? If you go to the Court of Session, what way do you see of allowing that without giving the trustees too much power?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I wonder, as we have got a few lawyers around this table, whether they want to comment on that. Is that a concern that the committee should have?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I have a couple of quick questions, following on from Chris Sheldon鈥檚 comment on the two bills. I have the privilege of sitting on the Social Justice and Social Security Committee, which is looking at the Charities (Regulation and Administration) (Scotland) Bill. You have mentioned one area, but is there anything else that you think needs to be clarified between the two bills at this stage?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
That is helpful.
In the previous couple of evidence sessions, we have had evidence regarding resolving disputes through mediation or arbitration, which Mike Blair touched on. As he said, that can happen only if everyone is willing to take part. In principle, should such provision be in the bill, or should mediation simply be encouraged in guidance?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I declared my interests before the previous panel of witnesses.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
The other example that academics raised with us last week related to someone going on to a submarine for a long period of service or going away for a long period of time. Do such issues concern you in practice?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
That was helpful.
Convener, I appreciate that we probably do not want to rewrite the law of succession on a Tuesday morning, but I think that the bill slightly opens a can of worms. Last week, with the academics, we looked at whether there should be a greater restriction on legal rights in this respect. I understand that, in some continental European countries such as Poland and Germany, people can write into their will clauses that do not to get rid of such rights completely but, certainly, dilute them further than we have.
I appreciate that I am again putting the witnesses on the spot by asking them to comment, but is that area worth pursuing, or have we struck the right balance on legal rights?