The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1311 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Obviously, we will support the regulations this morning. However, I have made the point on numerous occasions—and I will make it again—that I think that the process is slightly flawed. We take evidence from the cabinet secretary and then immediately have to vote on the regulations. As a Parliament, we have to look at the fact that, even if what the cabinet secretary has said today causes us concern, we have no option but to vote either for or against the regulations, and the Scottish Government has no time to reflect on the questions that we have asked. That is a procedural rather than a substantial issue.
There is still concern about some individuals, particularly in certain education settings, being left behind. In your answers, cabinet secretary, you said that there are varying views on the matter. The evidence that we have taken as a committee is that the payment should be made. I am grateful that you have said that you are going to look at the matter again, and I hope that we can look at it sooner rather than later. The danger, once we pass regulations as a Parliament, is that we then move on to the next thing and leave people behind. I hope that you will take what we and you have heard seriously and that some amended regulations can be brought forward in this parliamentary session. I am interested to know whether that is the timescale that you would be looking at, if you were to bring forward changes.
I also look forward to seeing the proposals in your bill, later this year, which will deal with the overpayment issue and the right of appeal. Again, we have taken evidence on that.
As someone who benefits from unpaid care, I think that we all recognise the massive role that unpaid carers play in our society. Often, those individuals do not necessarily want to do it but are put in a position whereby they have to do it because of their family situation—geographically or just because of how their family is made up. I welcome what we are doing here, as a Parliament, and I think that it will make a difference to individual lives. However, as you said, we do not want to leave anyone behind. I would welcome a mention—perhaps in your summing up—of the timescale that you are looking at for at least thinking about bringing in any changes.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I will follow that up with two brief supplementary questions. You are absolutely right to say that not all caring is necessarily age appropriate. However, people are where they are and, sadly, some people’s only choice is to use a son, daughter or sibling to help, because there is no one else to do it. I accept that we do not want to push people into caring, but sometimes they are pushed into it yet will no longer get any financial assistance.
In addition, are we not making a distinction between different types of education? We are saying that, if they are in one form of education, they can have money but, if they are in another, they cannot. I am concerned that we are making a false comparison between different types of education rather than recognising that, whatever way people go, further education is important.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I will move on slightly. What considerations does the Scottish Government take into account in deciding whether or not to delegate a power in a bill, in order to satisfy itself that that is appropriate? How do you work that one out?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Yes.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you. I will leave it there, convener.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning, minister. I thank you and your team for coming along.
I will move us on. Your officials provide the committee and subject committees with a helpful weekly update of instruments that are expected to be laid in the following two weeks. Can you or your officials indicate the anticipated volume of SSIs that are likely to be laid between now and Christmas, and which committees are likely to be the lead committees? If you cannot provide that to us today, perhaps you could drop a note to us.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you, minister, that is helpful. Although the answer might be “no”, I want to push you a wee bit harder on that. Committees need as much notice as possible for larger, or more complex, SSIs, especially large packages of instruments that need more scrutiny. Do you know whether any such instruments are in the pipeline in the next few months?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Without becoming too philosophical, do you think that there has been a change, both in the Scottish Government and at Westminster, with regard to using framework bills more often than was the case 20 or 30 years ago? If so, is that a deliberate policy decision or just something that has evolved over time?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Jeremy Balfour
In looking to the future and the programme for government that was announced just a few weeks ago, what balance has been struck with regard to what we just talked about, in respect of bills that are about to come forward?