The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1311 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Would you accept that, with the exception of this committee, secondary legislation is less well scrutinised than proposed primary legislation?
11:00Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Mr Jones, from a UK or Westminster perspective, we hear about co-design as well. Does that take place post or pre a framework bill being passed?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I have a very brief question before you depart.
As you pointed out, secondary legislation cannot be amended鈥攊t is either accepted or rejected. It has been put to us that there should be some way in which a committee could seek conversations with the Government about amending secondary legislation or flag up that, for example, it agrees with 80 per cent of an instrument but has concerns about 20 per cent of it. The committee could ask the Government to go away and think about the issue again. Would that work, or is it something that sounds good in theory but, in practice, might not help?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Do you have a view on that, Mr Carson?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Mr Gibson, in your experience of a number of different committees, is there a role for the lead committee in taking further evidence between stage 2 and stage 3?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I think that our witnesses have touched on this next issue, but they might want to expand on what was said. One of the Government鈥檚 justifications for having such bills is that it wants to make the process much more about consultation and taking stakeholders with it. The Government argues that that is easier to do once a framework bill has been passed. Are you sympathetic to that view, or should the consultation and development of policy with stakeholders take place before a bill appears in Parliament?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Would it be helpful to have some kind of framework whereby, if there was a major change in policy between stage 1 and stage 2, there would be an opportunity for the relevant committees to carry out further scrutiny before stage 3? Could that work in practice, or would it just make more work for the committees?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Jeremy Balfour
My question is for Jonathan Jones in the first instance. On the presumption that we can have some understanding of what a framework bill is, would it be helpful to have guidelines or an agreement between the Government and Parliament on how such bills should be dealt with and a governing framework that would ensure that both parties could work constructively together? Is that possible?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Has that been thought about in Wales? Is it something that you are thinking of taking forward?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Jeremy Balfour
That is not the point. I am asking about data collection. Why has the system not been designed in such a way as to get the information? At the moment, when you write to a general practitioner, how long it takes for that GP or medical professional to write back is not monitored. For me, that would be a key indicator of how the system is working. I appreciate that the agency is delivering all those benefits but that is not the issue. The issue is around the performance indicators. Why was the system not designed to provide such indicators in the first place?