The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1549 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Jeremy Balfour
To pick up on some of those themes, I have had a number of meetings with women鈥檚 groups, particularly in Edinburgh and the Lothians. There are concerns about women and children being put in temporary accommodation that is just not suitable. There may be single men there, or no proper kitchen facilities. The spaces may be unsafe.
Gordon MacRae, what is Shelter鈥檚 view on how Scotland is providing for homeless families? How could we do that differently, particularly for women and children?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Jeremy Balfour
Perhaps he is on mute or taking a break.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Jeremy Balfour
I direct my question to either Lorraine McGrath or Gordon MacRae. It is on the lessons that have been learned in the past 18 months, during the pandemic. It is clear that a lot of work was done around homelessness, and we almost saw the end of people being on the streets at all for a period last year.
My question is quite broad. What lessons have we learned from that? Have we鈥攍ocal authorities, the third sector and the Scottish Government鈥攔egressed even since then? Have we learned those lessons, and are we now implementing that learning as we go forward? Perhaps Gordon MacRae can start, followed by Lorraine McGrath.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Jeremy Balfour
I would be happy for someone else to jump in if Gordon cannot answer or if he cannot hear us. I am conscious of time.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Jeremy Balfour
I am grateful for that helpful explanation, minister.
I do not want to hold back the committee鈥檚 considerations for too long鈥擨 understand that this is quite technical stuff鈥攂ut I am slightly unclear about a certain point. I know that there are different criteria for deciding whether someone gets DLA or PIP, but my understanding鈥攑erhaps you can help me by providing more information later鈥攚as that the criteria with regard to CDP and ADP would be the same. I did not appreciate that the criteria for the awards will be different, so I wonder whether you can explain the issue a bit further in a letter to me. As I said, I do not want to delay the committee鈥檚 considerations鈥攐bviously, we are going to agree to the motion today鈥攂ut I wonder whether it would be possible to provide an explanation, just for my information.
My next question鈥攜ou will be glad to hear that it will be my final one鈥攔elates to the use of the phrase 鈥渢hroughout the night鈥 with regard to awards. I remember raising this issue when the proposals were originally brought forward, and I note that you have changed things back to what they were. I welcome that, but I have to wonder why it all happened in the first place. Did you make the change because of consultation, because it had been a simple drafting error or because of some great intervention by back-bench 成人快手?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Jeremy Balfour
Yes.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Jeremy Balfour
I want to move on to two more technical areas, the first of which relates to the recommendation, which you have not accepted, that people receiving CDP be eligible for short-term assistance if they are moving on to ADP. Why have you said no to that? We have said鈥攁nd rightly so鈥攖hat we want to treat people with dignity, fairness and respect but, given that they are already in the system and have already proved that they need the assistance, those receiving CDP should be treated as transferring to ADP instead of as new claimants. Why are we making them go back and reapply? It seems to me that we are not treating people with the respect that we had hoped for.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Jeremy Balfour
I have a policy difference with you, minister, in that, for me, the way to resolve the issue would have been to give any child who was on DLA or PIP the winter heating allowance. They would not have to be on the highest rate. I think that I made that point in committee in the previous session of the Parliament.
If we are talking about heating your house, you often do that during the day. It is not often at night, when you are in bed and can have less heating on. The draft regulations still exclude children who are on the lower rate of DLA or not on the higher rate of PIP from getting the payment. Why are you doing that if we are trying to help people who have higher heating costs? They are vulnerable individuals as well. What is the policy intent behind that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Jeremy Balfour
I thank the minster for that answer, and I am grateful for the change. Although it may seem quite technical in its terminology, it will make a very big difference to many people who are applying, so I welcome it.
I put on record my thanks to your team, minister, for all the work that they have done on the regulations. They are technical, but they will be very important for the people applying. Again, I thank your team for that, and thank you for the changes that you have made.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Jeremy Balfour
The question is more about those who are moving on to ADP having to reapply, given that they are already on the system and have been identified as having a need that requires them to receive benefits.