The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1311 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Jeremy Balfour
Mirka Skrzypczak, among the partnerships and individuals you deal with, is there any appetite for allowing floating charges to be granted by them?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Jeremy Balfour
I want to come back to a point that Jennifer Henderson made, just to clarify what powers you have. When the land register was rolled out initially, there were arguments about whether the right piece of land was being registered, who owned what and where the boundaries were. With the registers under the bill, if somebody said that they did not take a security over something or that there had been fraudulent behaviour, would you have powers to investigate that or would you refer it to another body?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Jeremy Balfour
I want to move on to another area. Perhaps one or both of the witnesses will want to take this question. At the moment, the bill does not deal with shares and other assets such as that, because of the Government’s view that it does not have the legal competence to grant that. Do you have a view? Should the bill be extended to cover shares?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Jeremy Balfour
It is several decades since I practised law, but, when I was practising, we discharged a standard security, or put the document forward to do so, only when we were selling a property. Often, a mortgage would be paid off but it would only be years later that the discharge would be done.
On Jon Hodge’s final point, my fear is that we end up with a register that is so large that it is almost impossible to find anything. Is that a danger?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Jeremy Balfour
I will put that question to Dr Hardman, as well. Do you think that there will be sufficient information to identify individual claims or pledges?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Jeremy Balfour
I want to ask about what is not in the bill before we examine other issues. The Law Commission drafted the original bill to include stocks and shares, but the Scottish Government came to the view that that is outwith the legislative competence of this Parliament and it is therefore working with the UK Government to see whether it can take that measure through by different means.
From the Law Society’s perspective, and perhaps from a practitioner’s perspective, do we have the legislative competence to cover that in the bill? If so, would you rather have the measure included in the bill or have it taken forward through an appropriate back-door method?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Jeremy Balfour
I want to take us back to the role of recording and the registers in general. I think that you dealt with some of that in response to the opening questions, but I would like to hear a wee bit more about that. Some respondents to the committee’s call for evidence have stated that the registers could never be comprehensive. Could you explain in layman’s language what the limitations might be?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning to you all. I will follow up on that point, Mr Dailly. If we accept your argument, how would you see that provision being taken out? Would you simply take all individuals out of the bill? Would you go down the other route of saying one cannot go against any household goods and define that in the bill, as well as other areas? As a third option, would you go for higher amounts? We have a £1,000 threshold; would you raise that to, say, £5,000, £6,000 or £7,000? I am wondering which of those three options you would choose—or have you come up with a fourth option—if we accept your argument?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Jeremy Balfour
The Parliament is looking at the bill and will come to a view on its different aspects. Are there improvements that could be made to the registers and how they will work? Is there clarity, or will it be a case of everyone going away thinking that they have got what they want and it will only be in practice that we find out who the winners and losers are? Do we need more clarity now on how the provisions will work in practice?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Jeremy Balfour
I do not want to open a can of worms but, as we heard last week from the Scottish Law Commission, such legislation comes around once in a generation—however we want to define “generation”. Is there anything that could have been in the bill but is not in it that it would be worth considering? A yes or no will do. Floating charges were mentioned. Would that be an area for partnerships to consider? Would it be worth considering that, or are we better to leave the bill as it is?