The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 722 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Alexander Stewart
I, too, commend you for your courage today in coming in and making the points that you have made.
You spoke about your difficulties when it came to reporting what had happened and dealing with the police, and you talked about the knock-on effects of that on you, as a victim. What developments would you like to see within Police Scotland in relation to how it manages such cases? The Domestic Abuse (Scotland) Act 2018 led to Police Scotland changing its priorities in relation to domestic abuse, but, given your circumstances, there is obviously still a gap, with things falling through the net. What should Police Scotland be looking at? What areas could be developed?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Alexander Stewart
You talked about the peer group that you have set up. Do you liaise with any of the authorities? Do you go to them, or do they come to you?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Alexander Stewart
You are right: if lessons have not been learned and the situation is not changing, something needs to be done. You are attempting to bridge that gap.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Alexander Stewart
As I said, I commend you for all that you have done so far and for coming here today, because that gives us an opportunity to think about what progress can be made and what we can do.
You also talked about compensation and things of that nature.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Alexander Stewart
You said that talking about a monetary sum in relation to your situation would belittle the whole process.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
Alexander Stewart
A wide range of recommendations on participation and understanding of the shared process have come out of the review. It would be good to get an overview of the Government鈥檚 views on the recommendations. Are the recommendations to be implemented in full? Do you have any timescales for implementation? Are there any that you would find difficult to deal with and might disregard?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
Alexander Stewart
I will move on to talk about the treatment of pre-application consultations, because that area creates some difficulty for individuals, organisations and communities. Is there any evidence that how wind farm developments are treated when it comes to the pre-application consideration is anything other than a tick-box exercise? That is the perception that some people have. What is the Scottish Government doing to improve such engagement?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
Alexander Stewart
Mr Ewing makes a very valid point with regard to how we should examine the issue. I also agree with David Torrance鈥檚 recommendation to write to the Deputy First Minister. The entire saga continues to unlock and show survivors and individuals across the care sector and support sector how they were dealt with in that entire area. We should examine the matter as much as we possibly can so that we can capture it.
As the convener identified, organisations and individuals are falling through the net, which is the last thing we want. We want to encapsulate as much information as we can so that we bring together the broadest range of views and opinions. We will achieve some of that through the suggestions of Fergus Ewing and David Torrance; I am therefore very supportive of those proposals.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
Alexander Stewart
In the report, there is the idea of creating a unit with responsibility for participation. Has the Government done any costings of the implementation of the report鈥檚 recommendations, including in relation to the proposed new unit? It is important to ensure that the recommendations can be effectively managed, and that can happen only if there are resources and proposals to support that unit and make it a reality.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
Alexander Stewart
I would certainly agree with all that.
We have seen in all the petitions the dilemmas that communities face, even with the technological advances that we have seen in medicine and the opportunities that can be dealt in relation to urban areas and rural areas, but that does not seem to be working in many communities. A more in-depth look by the health committee might well bring to the fore areas that have been addressed and concerns that have been raised by petitioners.
The communities have not received the continued support that is vitally important for their livelihoods in relation to any medical process. The health committee could do a much more in-depth analysis of some of the areas that have been brought to our attention, which might help to unravel the issues and to support the petitioners.