The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 793 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Brian Whittle
Good morning to the panel. It is good to see you in person.
I will start with Mr Humpherson. I have long talked about the need to create systems that are not just a collection of data. Our ability to collaborate, communicate and use the data in the most effective way is not where it should be, not just in Scotland but in the rest of the UK. The pandemic has highlighted to a great degree that we need to do better. Where are we with that? What lessons have we learned? What actions have been taken to increase our background information technology system, which allows a colossal amount of data to be gathered and collated?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Brian Whittle
It would be really interesting to get the two of you together, as two significant players in this area, to understand where the disconnect is.
I have one further small question, following on from my colleague John Mason’s question, about how television and radio put information across as the science evolves. Early in the pandemic, Jason Leitch and Nicola Sturgeon said that the evidence for masks was not there. Of course, as the science evolved, the evidence for masks was there. Early on, those working in the public health environment would be saying that we should be careful what we say to people, but things can completely change. Are you susceptible to a certain amount of criticism, especially around free speech, if you prevent people from saying something that becomes the reality a wee bit later on?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Brian Whittle
I will be very quick.
Dr Phin, what impact did SARS and avian flu have on our thinking? I think that it was suspected that there could be 50,000 deaths from avian flu in the UK, but it turned out to be something like 464. Did that stat influence the way in which we approached this particular pandemic?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Brian Whittle
Does anyone else want to come in on that question before I add a supplementary?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Brian Whittle
I thank the panel members for their time this morning.
As soon as information was put into the public domain, it seemed that other experts suddenly sprang up trying to say exactly the opposite. We seemed to collect a deluge of data. How far are we able to collate that data and communicate that in the public domain in a way that can easily be consumed? A lot of data was put on to websites such as the FACTS or NHS Inform websites, but I am not sure how many people actually visited those websites. Were Governments behind the curve in their ability to combat misinformation? Will Moy, could you answer that?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Brian Whittle
Will Moy, I saw you nod your head. Would you like to add something?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Brian Whittle
Tracey Brown, I assume that you would like to come in on the “follow the science” comment.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Brian Whittle
I want to follow that up with you, Dr Phin—it would be remiss of me not to, given that you represent Public Health Scotland, which was mentioned specifically in an evidence session that we held last week. We took evidence in private and one of the professors, who is a Government adviser, told us was that it was so hard—indeed, almost impossible—to get data from Public Health Scotland that they stopped asking for it.
I am not in attack mode, so I do not want you to be in defence mode. I am raising this because we need to look back and learn, and look forward to how we deliver better services and communications. Given what we were told, what is Public Health Scotland doing to improve access to data and find a better solution?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Brian Whittle
My argument is that it took us too long. That is not a criticism of your Government or any Government in particular. I think that it took us too long to respond. As you know, we are now reviewing that response. There will be a report on that, and I suggest that that might be the time to consider how and whether we change the statute book.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Brian Whittle
Good morning, cabinet secretary and panel. I hope that you are on the mend, Mr Swinney.
You probably recognise that we do not agree on some of the provisions. I go back to the word “proportionality”, which is what exercises me on the bill. As you said, ministers will decide what proportionality is. I assume that you recognise that there is a level of subjectivity to that.
On safeguards and balances, parliamentary scrutiny is the main safeguard in such decisions. Do you acknowledge that, by introducing the bill, you basically bypass that?