The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 693 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 23 March 2023
Brian Whittle
Good morning. I will take forward the point that Jim Fairlie made about education and ask about educating our health professionals about long Covid.
GPs are supposed to have a certain amount of time for continuing professional development built into their day or week. I hark back to my time on the Health and Sport Committee when, any time that we did an investigation into any condition, we found that there was a need to educate our healthcare professionals about that condition.
That is fine in theory, but we know that GPs are under incredible pressure at the moment, so in practice CPD is probably the last thing on their list. Given that the committee has heard stories about GPs’ lack of knowledge around long Covid, how can we create a health service where—if you will pardon the expression—they have the time to breathe that will allow them to take on CPD?
10:30COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 23 March 2023
Brian Whittle
That is helpful. I want to go on to another topic. Quite rightly, Scotland has a world-renowned reputation in medical research. The committee has heard evidence about data collection, which Scotland is also good at. Where we fall down is on deployment of the data and using it to our best advantage. The cabinet secretary and I have a shared interest in information technology. Covid, and now long Covid, have highlighted that there is an issue with how we use our data, and with the fact that our IT systems are possibly not capable of using it to our best advantage. If we strip the matter right back, should we not now look again at how different IT systems across our nation interact so that we can deploy data in the most effective way?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 23 March 2023
Brian Whittle
I would appreciate that, cabinet secretary.
On long Covid specifically, the world-class research that we have in this country highlights the issues that we have just talked about. How do we best deploy in our communities the data that has been gathered for our healthcare professionals on what long Covid looks like and what the symptoms are? We have heard and we know that what is happening practically on the ground does not match the research that we are doing, so how do we connect them? That has to be the starting point. What work are you doing on that? As you said, the data is cloud based, so it is about gathering all that knowledge together so that we can deploy it.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 23 March 2023
Brian Whittle
I was just thinking about a point that Murdo Fraser made when he raised the potential advantages and disadvantages of having long Covid clinics. Have you considered that if we were to have such clinics where people with that condition, or who potentially have it, coalesce, one of the advantages would be an ability to gather data on it, because we would know where those people are.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 23 March 2023
Brian Whittle
Finally from me, how do we take the knowledge that we are gathering on long Covid and educate our community about what long Covid looks like? The other thing that we hear a lot is that long Covid numbers are an estimate, because many people who have symptoms that could be long Covid do not come forward. How do we furnish our communities with that knowledge so that people know to come forward?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Brian Whittle
Do we have an information technology system in Scotland that allows for the proper deployment and sharing of data across the whole system?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Brian Whittle
I will broaden out that question to you, Euan. We have always heard that Scotland is fantastic at gathering data—that we have a phenomenal ability to do that. However, given the practicalities of informing our GPs at the front line about what to look for in Covid and of deploying resources to help patients at the front line, our ability to deploy that data is not good. That is what we are hearing just now—that that element is not good.
Where are we with that, and what do we need to do to ensure that our healthcare professionals are properly informed about the issues around long Covid? We have even heard that some of them still do not believe in long Covid—they feel that there is a mental health issue around long Covid. The reality is that long Covid exists. How are we going to get to a point at which all that gathered data is available to our healthcare professionals so that they can deploy the resources?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Brian Whittle
Good morning. My interest in health is around the gathering and deployment of data. Do we have a system that allows for the effective deployment of data? We gather data, but do we have a system that, in practice, allows that data to be crunched and deployed, such that effectiveness is measured as we consider how the data ends up being used in the treatment of patients? To date, we have heard from clinicians and from sufferers of long Covid that the investigation and the data are not allowing for effective treatment on the front line.
I put that to you first, Professor Robertson, as a statistician and a non-clinician. Is that right?