The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 737 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 6 November 2023
Brian Whittle
I turn to Jim Grant. From a council perspective, does the planning system frustrate you?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 6 November 2023
Brian Whittle
Yes, convener. I will be brief, given the time. I wanted to have a wee look at the relationship between the policies of the UK Government and those of the Scottish Government. You might be aware that they disagree on the odd occasion. Does the UK Government policy provide enough clarity and certainty on the transition to net zero? I put that to Stuart Bews first.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 6 November 2023
Brian Whittle
I will leave it there, convener.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 6 November 2023
Brian Whittle
If we add in all the layers of government, is there enough policy coherence between them to allow you to develop a strategic plan? Stop hiding, Stuart. [Laughter.]
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 6 November 2023
Brian Whittle
I would like to build on that with Alasdair Ross. I will play devil’s advocate. You would suggest that many communities would say, “Yes, we think that it’s really important for the transition that we have onshore wind and solar, but we don’t want it over here.” How do we cross that boundary and bring communities with us to make sure that they are properly recompensed for any development that takes place around them?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 6 November 2023
Brian Whittle
If you agree with that, Jim, what would be your asks for each Government?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 6 November 2023
Brian Whittle
Good afternoon. I appreciate your being here.
I am interested in how planning has come up in discussions this morning. It was mentioned that communities feel removed from decision making and are actually disengaging. The words “onshore wind” and “solar” came up.
Do you consider that the current planning regulations are fit for purpose, especially when it comes to spatial planning and the presumption in favour of planning permission? I am a South Scotland MSP, and my mailbag is full of letters from people saying, “We said no, but the Scottish Government said yes, so why did you bother asking us?” Alison Stuart, is that part of the problem?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 6 November 2023
Brian Whittle
I will leave it there, convener.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Brian Whittle
You raised the issue, as did Alan McIntosh, that the bill will affect a very small number of people. You made the point that some people have capacity issues that are outwith the confines of the bill and you also talked about resourcing. My concern about the way that the bill is drafted is that the whole point of the bill is to help people who are in real need, but we must also ensure that we do not run out of resources. Where are we with that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Brian Whittle
Good morning, panellists. I have listened to what you have said, and I am interested in the practicalities of addressing the issues that have been raised. Alan McIntosh, you talked about the problem that we are trying to solve. In an ideal world, somebody having mental health issues would seek treatment and, during that treatment, they would come to you, but that is not the real world. In the real world, people hide their mental health issues and might not receive treatment.
Do you have the required skill set? Is extra training required? Do you have the practical skills to be able to identify and deliver on what the bill is trying to achieve in this area? I am concerned about the practicalities of what we are trying to do here.
Natalia Mendel, you talked about the need to identify those who would benefit from the mental health moratorium. You discussed very clearly that there is so much scope in mental health that not all people with a mental health issue will need that provision. How are we going to identify that? How are we going to make sure that we do not drop the ball?