The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 918 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Brian Whittle
I have to say that there is ambiguity in the definition of a championship offence as it compares with UK law. It is incredibly important that such an offence is defined, so I will press amendment 13.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Brian Whittle
I thank the minister for his early and regular engagement on the bill. My concern arose from the wording in section 22 of the bill—“Power to enter and searchâ€â€”and the wording around search and seizure of counterfeit goods or, as the bill describes them, “infringing articlesâ€. I raised that concern in a meeting with the minister to discuss the bill.
Although I do not oppose seizing or destroying illegal material, it is important to make clear the definitions in and interpretations of the legislation and the processes to prevent overreach and threats to legitimate traders. The bill makes it clear that ticket touting, trading or advertising in event zones at prohibited times are offences. However, many exceptions are written into the bill.
In addition, I acknowledge that UK law makes it illegal to produce and sell counterfeit goods, but that is not listed as an offence in the bill, which creates an uncertainty around whether it is a championship offence, as defined in the bill. For reference, a “Championship offence†is described in the bill as having the
“meaning given by section 18(1)(a)â€,
which is on “General enforcement powersâ€. It says:
“An enforcement officer may take such reasonable steps as the officer considers necessary ... for the purpose of preventing or ending the commission of an offence under this Act (a ‘Championship offence’)â€.
Through amendment 13, I am trying to ensure that there is guidance on what constitutes such an offence and to give clarity to Police Scotland and councils on what they should act on and how they should do so.
I move amendment 13.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Brian Whittle
I just want to check—do Brett Collins or Paula McLaren want to come in on any of those questions? If you do, please indicate.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Brian Whittle
Laura Boyce, you have led me to the issue of proactive detection. Again, there is a practical element here—if that is going to be part of what HIS is involved with, it will require resource for HIS to be proactive rather than for HIS to passively wait for reports to come in. Where do you stand on that? Is it something that will have to be properly resourced?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Brian Whittle
Sorry—please come in, Brett.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Brian Whittle
That is really useful, Brett, and it takes us where my line of questioning is going. It is about how we can deliver a bill that everybody will be compliant with, but it is also about how we do so practically and effectively.
My final question along those lines is about some of the things that have not been considered, such as issues that are associated with the enforcement provisions. For example, how will we address things such as secure storage and the maintenance of a chain of evidence for seized items, including counterfeit medicines. What is the Scottish Government’s role in ensuring that those issues are taken care of and that we have the tools to deliver the bill practically?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Brian Whittle
¹ó¾±²Ô²¹±ô±ô²â—
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Brian Whittle
How is competence currently monitored, and how should it be monitored? How could it be monitored through the bill?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Brian Whittle
I am hearing that there is no on-going monitoring of competence, and that we cannot even define what a medical procedure is—wow.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Brian Whittle
And that will be me. [Laughter.] Good morning, and thank you for being here. With regard to the baseline, we have heard a lot of evidence about the wide variety of practitioners involved in the industry, from highly qualified healthcare professionals, right the way down to those who can go out and ply their trade having maybe been on course for a couple of days. How do we ensure that the way that we deliver regulation catches the practitioners who are potentially causing most of the issues? I hesitate to use the term “rogue tradersâ€, but we know that they exist. How do we make sure that they are identified and caught, rather than impacting on businesses that are going to be continually compliant just because they are the easy ones to target?