The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 282 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 November 2024
Annie Wells
At the outset, I thank the minister for the constructive discussions that we have had on the amendments.
The minister鈥檚 amendments 8 and 9 will prohibit individuals who are currently on the sex offenders register from standing at Scottish Parliament or local elections, but my amendments 8A, 9A, 20A and 20B go a bit further and would prevent all sex offenders, including those who have been on the sex offenders register, from standing.
I lodged my amendments because the people who I have spoken to have said that they simply would not feel comfortable allowing someone who had committed a sexual offence to stand for the Parliament or as a councillor, simply because a period of time had passed since they had been removed from the sex offenders register.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Annie Wells
Good morning, cabinet secretary. You touched on this in your opening remarks, but what is your response to stakeholders who feel deep disappointment about the decision to delay the bill and say that there has been a betrayal of trust and that they were blindsided by the decision.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Annie Wells
I am happy with those answers, convener. Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Annie Wells
Convener, I do not have any questions this morning. Everything that I had has been answered. It has been very comprehensive.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Annie Wells
We were disappointed when we received the letter and heard that the bill was not being introduced. What were your initial thoughts when you received the letter or, in Professor McHarg鈥檚 case, read the programme for government? How was the communication for you?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Annie Wells
Good morning, everyone. I am sorry that I am not with you in person.
Most people have touched on this, but can you provide more in-depth insight into whether there are particular groups or communities that will be negatively impacted by the increase? Perhaps Aaliya can answer first.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Annie Wells
In her opening remarks, Aaliya said that further research needs to be done on the impact of the fee increase on human rights. What should that research cover? Is there anything that we have not looked at yet?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Annie Wells
Thank you very much for those responses.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Annie Wells
Thank you.
10:45Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Annie Wells
Good morning, Jeremy, and good morning, officials. Just to touch on what Paul O鈥橩ane was asking about, I would just note that, when I and my colleague Marie McNair held evidence sessions last week with the Glasgow Disability Alliance, a lot of the people there said that the commissioner did not have enough teeth. They pointed out that there were no enforcement powers and asked why no enforcement powers had been put into the bill to start with. Can you explain to them why they were not put in at the start?