The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6954 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Finlay Carson
Thank you. Did you want to come back in, Donna?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Finlay Carson
Who would like to kick off? Donna keeps catching my eye.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Finlay Carson
What is your view on the Crofting Commission’s decision to increase resources for its enforcement duties?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Finlay Carson
Good morning, and welcome to the 29th meeting in 2025 of the Rural Affairs and Islands Committee. Before we begin, I ask everyone to ensure that their electronic devices are switched to silent.
Our first agenda item is consideration of the Crofting and Scottish Land Court Bill at stage 1. At today’s meeting, we will take evidence from representatives of the crofting community. I will invite you all to introduce yourselves in a moment.
We have allocated around two hours for the discussion. As we have quite a few participants, I ask everyone to be succinct in their questions and answers. Please indicate to me or one of the clerks if you wish to participate at any point. Please understand that there is no expectation on you to speak on every question, particularly if you feel that the point has already been made or that the discussion does not relate directly to your area of expertise. Also, you do not need to operate your microphones—we have a microphone operator at the end of the table who will do that for you.
We will kick off in a clockwise direction. I ask Jackie McCreery to introduce herself.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Finlay Carson
I will come back to that. I have lots more questions, but I am aware that other members wish to ask questions.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Finlay Carson
You are all most welcome. Thank you for giving your time this morning to help us with our deliberations.
We have five themes for discussion, with probably half an hour per theme, and we will kick off with the environmental use of crofts. I would like to hear your views on section 1, which revises the duty on crofters to allow for a third and distinct option for croft land: environmental use. In the evidence that we have already heard, there have been calls for greater clarity on how the term “environmental use” will be defined, so we would like to hear your views on that. Who would like to kick off?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Finlay Carson
Ariane Burgess will ask our final questions.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Finlay Carson
That is a good example.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Finlay Carson
A couple of times, you have said that a certain aspect is maybe not for the bill, but it sounds as though it has a lot of potential unintended consequences. You talked about someone needing to offload 100 grand of profit and how they could do that. If I was a tax adviser managing someone’s affairs and I was looking at this session, I would be thinking, “Okay, we’ve got this bill coming in and it’s not going to make changes, but they will probably do that in the next five years, so I’ll send a leaflet to all the crofters and say, ‘I will buy your grazing shares,’ because that’s investable, or the risk is worth taking.” We then might be here in five years’ time, saying, “Do you know what? The horse has bolted, because we have a whole lot of absentee owners of grazing shares that we’re just not going to get back without fighting through the courts.”
You say that the bill is not the place to deal with the issue, but does it need to go further? I was going to ask this next question at the very end of the session. Does the bill need to go further to address some of the loopholes and put safeguards in place now, rather than highlighting those loopholes and allowing them to be exploited over the next four or five years until a new crofting bill is introduced?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Finlay Carson
Do you want to come back in, Josh?