The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5896 contributions
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
Finlay Carson
Rachael Hamilton will be next, to be followed by Mercedes Villalba.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
Finlay Carson
We have no further questions, Lord Bonomy. Do you have any closing comments?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
Finlay Carson
I want to clarify something. The approach is quite straightforward in that importers will notify what they are importing through paperwork and electronically. That might be a lorry full of bean seeds, which are low risk, so only 3 per cent might be checked, or Ii could be a lorry full of potatoes, 50 per cent of which might be checked, because they are higher risk. Why is it proposed that 30 per cent of some plant products in annex 2 in the minister’s letter will be checked? That is not one of the standard five frequencies, which are 3, 5, 10, 50 and 100 per cent. Why on earth will 30 per cent of some plant products be checked?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
Finlay Carson
I think that Robbie Marsland indicated that he wishes to come in on that.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
Finlay Carson
Okay. Thank you.
That brings us to the end of this session. I thank all the witnesses for attending either remotely or in person. Your evidence has been very useful.
I will suspend the meeting to allow for a changeover of witnesses.
11:09 Meeting suspended.Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
Finlay Carson
We will now look more specifically at the bill. I will bring in Mercedes Villalba.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 8 June 2022
Finlay Carson
That ends our evidence session. I thank you all for your valuable evidence, which will help to inform our work as we move forward.
We will suspend for a comfort break and a changeover of witnesses.
11:07 Meeting suspended.Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 8 June 2022
Finlay Carson
You said that you do not use dogs to help control foxes, but what is that decision based on? Given that the witnesses on the previous panel said that hunting with dogs is sometimes the most animal welfare-minded way to control foxes—it might be the only way to control them effectively in undergrowth or whatever—what did RSPB Scotland base that decision on?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 8 June 2022
Finlay Carson
I ask everyone to bear in mind that we are discussing hunting with dogs. I fear that our discussion has grown arms and legs, and I would like us to focus on the bill.
Jim Fairlie and Alasdair Allan would like to ask supplementary questions.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 8 June 2022
Finlay Carson
You want a flexible approach. This is not specifically about RSPB Scotland’s ethical stance on predator control, but do you believe that birds on land that is managed by organisations or individuals who take that ethical approach are at a disadvantage in that they are more likely to be predated because the option of using dogs to flush out predators is not considered? Does that approach put those birds at a disadvantage?