The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6954 contributions
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2023
Finlay Carson
Thank you. That is helpful.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2023
Finlay Carson
Our second item of business is consideration of the legislative consent memorandum for the Shark Fins Bill. I welcome Mairi Gougeon, Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs and Islands, and her supporting officials, who are Allan Gibb from Marine Scotland and Emma Phillips from the Scottish Government. The officials are joining us remotely. I remind them that, if they wish to speak, they should type R in the chat box.
I invite the cabinet secretary to make an opening statement.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2023
Finlay Carson
Thank you, minister. We absolutely share your frustration at the lack of time that we have in which to look at this, and we agree that, today, we are not looking at the general principles of genetic engineering or the wider impact that the legislation might or might not have.
My question is about the fact that the Scottish Government, not the UK Government, has brought forward the LCM because the UK Government did not feel that one was required. I understand that the Scottish Government is concerned about the consequential powers in clause 42. Has the Scottish Government had any indication of how the powers are intended to be used in relation to Scotland that would cause you to raise concerns?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2023
Finlay Carson
Have you had any indication that the UK Government would intend to use those powers?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2023
Finlay Carson
Unfortunately, the paper does not immediately make it clear that that letter is from the Scottish Government.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2023
Finlay Carson
Is this the first time that you have had concerns over a clause similar to clause 42? Have there been other examples of Westminster legislation in relation to which you have had to consider such a clause?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2023
Finlay Carson
Does any member wish to comment on the Conservation of Salmon (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2022?
No member has indicated that they wish to comment.
I suggest that, at some point, we consider the paper that has been prepared on the conservation plan. Instruments on this subject often throw up difficulties on river classification, and we had 221 responses on the back of the SSI, so I will ask the clerks to write to request further information.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2023
Finlay Carson
Marine Scotland.
That concludes the public part of our meeting.
10:22 Meeting continued in private until 11:33.Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Finlay Carson
I will bring in Ariane Burgess to carry on that theme, unless Jenni Minto’s supplementary question is to do with testing. Is it, Jenni?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Finlay Carson
This discussion is bizarre. George, you talk the talk, and it all sounds very good—you do the soil test and the work after it, and you will save money. That is all good, and it improves biodiversity and helps to tackle climate change. Cabinet secretary, you said that it is not about just ticking a box, but the sad fact is that, up to 12 December, only 12 people had ticked the box. We do not even know whether those 12 people went on to do the wonderful and right things that George Burgess talked about. Given that funding is available for something that is the key to future profitability, future low-impact farming and so on, it seems bizarre that we have had such a massively slow uptake.
You suggested in a letter on the pre-budget scrutiny that the national test programme has been “slow” with a
“mixture of feedback from the sector”.
What is the feedback from the sector? Why is the programme not working? If it is a simple process that results in far better farming, profitability-wise, for the farmer and for climate change and biodiversity, why do we have such a shockingly low uptake? It cannot be about just the lull between people doing the test and claiming, because farmers are not renowned for doing something and not claiming the money back. Where has it all gone wrong?