The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5898 contributions
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2022
Finlay Carson
At stage 1, the bill was voted through unanimously on the basis that it aims to improve animal welfare while continuing to allow dogs to be used to control predators. Throughout the weeks and the months of evidence taking, not once did we hear any issues about animal welfare and rough shooting鈥擨 believe that not one piece of evidence on that came before the committee.
I think that there is an unintended consequence of including rabbits in the definition of wild mammal, which is a knock-on effect on rough shooting. Given the response to our additional call for evidence, there are concerns that section 6 does not fit the bill, either for those who wish to continue rough shooting or for those who wish any sort of country sports to be stopped. It does neither and could potentially open a loophole.
Has the bill team considered possible amendments that would address those concerns? That might involve a better definition of rough shooting and excluding it. Alternatively, have you considered other measures that would clear up what looks like a bit of a boorach at the moment?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2022
Finlay Carson
Would you describe an impact on rough shooting as an unintended consequence of the legislation?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2022
Finlay Carson
Was your understanding of rough shooting complete enough to allow you to understand exactly what the implications of the two-dog limit would be on rough shooting, or is that something that has developed since the stage 1 evidence? Is your understanding of rough shooting better now than what it was initially?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2022
Finlay Carson
Okay.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2022
Finlay Carson
Did you have discussions with Police Scotland on rough shooting prior to the evidence that the minister gave when the concerns were raised?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2022
Finlay Carson
Has the minister considered any amendments to address Police Scotland鈥檚 concerns?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2022
Finlay Carson
Do members agree to have a further stakeholder engagement session?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2022
Finlay Carson
I am sorry but, at the moment, we are just considering whether we want to take further evidence.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2022
Finlay Carson
Our next item of business is consideration of petition PE1758, on ending greyhound racing in Scotland. Members will note that the Scottish Animal Welfare Commission has written to us to say that it wishes to take more time to consider the issue of a ban on greyhound racing and expects to come to a decision next February. On that basis, are members content to delay further consideration until the SAWC has come to a view on the matter?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2022
Finlay Carson
That is not at all how rough shooting works in practice. What I described was far from a driven shoot; I think that it was suggested that it was like grouse shooting or fox shooting. That is not the case. I should declare an interest. I have taken part in rough shoots, but I do not have a dog that flushes animals. I would stand and shoot, so it is not always the case that the shooter is in control of the dogs. What often happens is that there are four or five people who beat and who have dogs for flushing. That is their day out and that is what they do.
There might be two or three guns who do not have ownership of or responsibility for the dogs that will take part. In that case, who is illegally hunting? Is it the guy with the gun or the beaters with the dogs? This is a grey area.
I was certainly not talking about a driven shoot, but about a rough shoot. Activity that could be described as a driven shoot could include beaters working a wood with dogs that those who are shooting have no ownership of or responsibility for.