The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5898 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Finlay Carson
Thank you. That was a good example of time keeping to kick off.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Finlay Carson
You talked about “facts”. What research justifies your saying that the Cameron report was wrong in relation to conservation and in saying that the removal of the limit would benefit fishing communities? What research has been done since then?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Finlay Carson
The opinion of the majority of the committee is that we should close the petition and incorporate consideration of spatial management of inshore fisheries in our future consideration of the national marine plan. If that plan comes to us as the lead committee, I assure the petitioner that we will engage extensively with all stakeholders, the petitioner and the SCFF when the opportunity arises.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Finlay Carson
Your views will be on the record.
Do members agree that we should close the petition?
Members indicated agreement.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Finlay Carson
You said that the limit was removed because it was too complicated. The Cameron report suggested that the limit was removed because it could not be justified on grounds of conservation, and it recommended the removal of the restrictions for the benefit of the fishing community.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Finlay Carson
I call Ariane Burgess.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Finlay Carson
Your petition is all about mobile gear fishing. Surely you are not suggesting that mobile gear fishing is responsible for the situation. We know that ecosystems are complex—you have said that yourself. There are lots of different effects and causes of that. There is global warming, and plankton and sand eels are becoming more abundant further north. There is a reduction in seabirds. Your petition, however, suggests that it is all down to mobile gear within a 3-mile limit. Surely that is not scientifically based—not at the moment; you are just making an assumption that we should have a blanket 3-mile ban.
You have also said yourself that there are some places where there might not need to be a 3-mile ban—on the east coast or whatever. It is either a blanket ban or it is not a blanket ban. Further to what Jim Fairlie has mentioned, is there any science to back up what you are saying?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Finlay Carson
Thank you. That has given us a good overview of the petition.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Finlay Carson
Is there any evidence to suggest that cod move north because of colder waters?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Finlay Carson
We have covered that issue well. There is one thing that I want to ask you. You said that 58 per cent of the sea bed was severely damaged—I think that you used the word “decimated”. Where do you get that figure from? Can you point the committee to where that research was done?