The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 7009 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Finlay Carson
The question is, that amendment 170 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Finlay Carson
The question is, that amendment 105 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Finlay Carson
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 7, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 28 disagreed to.
Amendments 154 and 29 not moved.
Section 12 agreed to.
Section 13—Modification, suspension and revocation of muirburn licence
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Finlay Carson
The result of the division is: For 4, Against 5, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 31 disagreed to.
Section 14—Muirburn Code
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Finlay Carson
The result of the division is: For 4, Against 5, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 103 disagreed to.
Amendment 42 not moved.
Section 16, as amended, agreed to.
After section 16
Amendment 168 moved—[Rhoda Grant].
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Finlay Carson
As we know, the objectives are very high level. As a result, people’s understanding of what they mean differs quite broadly. We heard from your officials at a previous evidence session that they should be interpreted according to their “ordinary meaning”. There is some confusion about what that means and how that might be defined in the future. How will the objectives help stakeholders to understand what the broad aspirations and general policy direction are, and how will they be measured? Will you further define the objectives and what their expected outcomes will look like? If so, when?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Finlay Carson
I was referring to the terms in the objectives. Take the objective on regenerative and sustainable agriculture for example. How might that be defined?
There could be issues further down the road because of the United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020 or something else, and there could be an argument about what the ordinary description is. That could be solved by being more specific about what the objectives mean in practice.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Finlay Carson
There was a suggestion that we should try to finish the first session at 1 o’clock, but I am minded to carry on until 1.45 at the latest. We will continue to consider the amendments.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Finlay Carson
We intend to finish at 1.45, which should be before your committee reconvenes. That will also give people time to prepare for questions this afternoon. I will press on. We may finish before 1.45. We indicated that we expected to finish the session by 1 o’clock but, given the progress that we have made, we need to try to push on a little bit. However, I take on board your comments.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Finlay Carson
I am really confused. We know what the status quo is. The committee will have to comment on and, ultimately, amend the bill that is in front of us. The level of the cap that you foresee being in place in the future will be critical to our larger farms and, as we have heard, to some of our smaller producers. When will you make it clear exactly what your position is on capping, top slicing or front loading? We are now at the business end of the bill process. We know where we are at the moment, but we need to know where we will be in two or three years’ time. Surely you can give us some indication of whether it is your intention to extend the capping powers or to retain them at the level that they are at just now.