The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5898 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Finlay Carson
Will it update the level of competence that is required in order for someone to be authorised to engage in night shooting if that person is using night sights rather than going lamping? There is quite a difference in the skill level that is required.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Finlay Carson
I am still concerned about the fact that there is only one authorisation scheme. Can you give us an indication of how many stalkers are currently authorised to lamp—to shoot at night?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Finlay Carson
How can NatureScot be assured that the stalker has the appropriate training if the authorisation is not for individuals? I am concerned about the lowest common denominator here. If there is only one authorisation scheme, someone who is authorised to shoot at night—to lamp—would automatically be able to shoot using night sights. As we have already suggested—and I think we have agreed—that requires a different level of skill, given the margins of error that infrared or heat-sensitive sights have. If someone was at the standard to be able to lamp, they would automatically get authorisation to use night sights—is that correct?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Finlay Carson
I was just reminding you that we have plenty of time, so there is no need to interrupt the minister when she is giving a response. I want to make sure that we carry out our debate with the highest level of respect. So, if the minister is responding, I request that you do not interact until she has finished her answer. You will have plenty of time during the debate phase, and later in the agenda, to raise all the points that you need to raise.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Finlay Carson
I have a couple of questions about the deer cull. How many authorisations for out-of-season culling are sought but rejected? Have authorisations been rejected? If so, on what basis are they rejected?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Finlay Carson
I have an issue to raise before I move on to other members. You mentioned tree growth. There was a 28 per cent increase in bracken biomass while Asulox was licensed for use. The situation would appear to be out of control. I take on board your point that we are talking about only 2 per cent of bracken, but we have removed one of the tools to tackle it. We cannot plant trees where there is bracken that needs to be controlled; doing that will not work. Is it not a chicken-and-egg situation? If you cannot plant the trees, how will they stop the growth of bracken? I am a bit confused.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Finlay Carson
I am still a bit confused. This is probably one of the reasons why there was a bit of confusion when we looked at the issue prior to the summer recess. The UK Expert Committee on Pesticides looks at chemicals, and the HSE looks at that evidence to make a decision. In making its decision, the HSE considers whether the benefits outweigh the potential harm. I get that—that is one of the critical factors.
The ECP said that it would not recommend granting emergency authorisation. Much of that was due to the fact that the applicants had not provided any more information, which is one of the technical obligations for getting an emergency authorisation. It is not an emergency if nothing changes; it is an on-going issue. The ECP based its advice on the fact that, technically, nothing had changed and therefore the situation could not be considered to be an emergency.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Finlay Carson
My concern is that, if someone is authorised to lamp, that would mean that they were automatically authorised to use night sights without any additional conditions applying to that authorisation, which might mean that, if NatureScot refused to authorise someone to use night sights, because it felt that there was an issue with that person’s ability to use them safely or competently, they would lose the ability to lamp as well.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Finlay Carson
The possibility that, if people are deemed not to be suitably trained or qualified to use night-vision sights, they might not get a lamping licence, because the authorisation covers both things, is quite concerning. As far as I can see, there is no differentiation between an authorisation for lamping and an authorisation for night sights.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Finlay Carson
Fit and competent to lamp, but not necessarily fit and competent to—