The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5898 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Finlay Carson
Thank you for your time this morning—it has been hugely useful.
That concludes the public part of our meeting.
10:33 Meeting continued in private until 12:21.Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Finlay Carson
Since members have no further questions, would any of our witnesses like to make a comment?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Finlay Carson
The people who are likely to have a certificate are those who are already aware and who want to do the right thing, so it does not address the issue. If you want to sell puppies out of the back of a car, the certificate makes no difference—it is a valueless piece of paper. It is just an extra hoop for people to jump through and I do not know how it will incentivise those who are not minded to follow the code.
You touched on chipping, which is a legal obligation. Do we have any idea how many people chip their dogs and how many do not? Is that policed in any way? Does the SSPCA carry out random chip checks? That is already in legislation. It is also a physical thing—you can tell whether a dog has a chip—but the stuff that we are looking at now is not like that. For example, how can you check that someone has seen the bitch? How can you ensure that someone is conscious of the cost of keeping a dog? It is all very intangible, whereas chipping is a tangible thing. Do we have any idea whether people are abiding by that, given that there is no national database?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Finlay Carson
Thank you. That is helpful.
We will explore the code of practice in more detail, but, before we move on, I want to ask about one thing that I am uncertain about. Will the bill deliver more than what we have at the moment? It appears that the only obligation on the Government as the bill stands is to create a code. The Government can create a code of practice at the moment but has chosen not to do that. The bill would force the Government to do that but, as with everything else in the bill, it says that the Government “may” legislate or do something. Does the bill go far enough to ensure that all the concerns that we have just heard are addressed legally?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Finlay Carson
That takes us quite nicely to the subject of certificates, with questions from Kate Forbes.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Finlay Carson
Without traceability, none of the things that we are talking about will be effective. Could the argument be made that what we need is simply a mandatory registration scheme for puppies to be microchipped? That would provide full traceability with all the required information, including the name of the breeder, where the dogs were bred and where they have been housed. Would that not just circumnavigate the bill, which does not place any requirements on the Government at all? We would go back to the good old days, if you like, when we had dog licences, but that dog licence scheme could be on a nationwide database to allow better checks and better scrutiny of breeders—whether they were puppy farmers, if you like, breeding multiple times or had small-scale unregistered litters, as at the moment. Would that not be a solution, rather than all these little bits in another bill? Are there any comments?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Finlay Carson
I will bring in Holly Conway and then Jamie Halcro Johnston, who has a question that follows on from that point.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Finlay Carson
Good morning, and welcome to the 23rd meeting in 2023 of the Rural Affairs and Islands Committee. Apologies have been received from Jim Fairlie and Rachael Hamilton. I welcome Jamie Halcro Johnston, who attends as a substitute. Before we begin, I ask Jamie Halcro Johnston to declare any relevant interests.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Finlay Carson
Would anybody else like to come in on that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Finlay Carson
You have mentioned the code, and referred to people wanting to see the puppy’s mother and the use of Airbnbs. However, the code would not make a person liable for anything. At the end of the day, it is just a document that you could pay regard to but that you do not have to pay regard to. What teeth does the bill have to put in place some of the safeguards that you have suggested?