The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5898 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Finlay Carson
There will be a division.
For
Adam, Karen (Banffshire and Buchan Coast) (SNP)
Allan, Alasdair (Na h-Eileanan an Iar) (SNP)
Burgess, Ariane (Highlands and Islands) (Green)
Fairlie, Jim (Perthshire South and Kinross-shire) (SNP)
Forbes, Kate (Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch) (SNP)
Grant, Rhoda (Highlands and Islands) (Lab)
Wishart, Beatrice (Shetland Islands) (LD)
Against
Carson, Finlay (Galloway and West Dumfries) (Con)
Hamilton, Rachael (Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire) (Con)
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Finlay Carson
I call Edward Mountain to wind up and indicate whether he wishes to press or withdraw amendment 176.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Finlay Carson
I call Colin Smyth to wind up and to press or withdraw amendment 54A.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Finlay Carson
Amendment 53, in the name of Rachael Hamilton, is grouped with amendment 75.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Finlay Carson
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 7, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 53 disagreed to.
Section 4—Regulation of certain wildlife traps
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Finlay Carson
The question is, that amendment 177 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Finlay Carson
The question is, that amendment 110 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Finlay Carson
There will be a division.
For
Grant, Rhoda (Highlands and Islands) (Lab)
Against
Adam, Karen (Banffshire and Buchan Coast) (SNP)
Allan, Alasdair (Na h-Eileanan an Iar) (SNP)
Burgess, Ariane (Highlands and Islands) (Green)
Carson, Finlay (Galloway and West Dumfries) (Con)
Fairlie, Jim (Perthshire South and Kinross-shire) (SNP)
Forbes, Kate (Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch) (SNP)
Hamilton, Rachael (Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire) (Con)
Wishart, Beatrice (Shetland Islands) (LD)
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Finlay Carson
Amendment 78, in the name of Finlay Carson, is grouped with amendments, 80, 19, 84, 93, 100, 41, 103 and 105.
Amendment 78 seeks to require Scottish ministers to publish the results of the consultation to be carried out under section 12(9) and to give reasons for any decision that is reached. That applies not only to amendment 78 but to amendments 80, 84, 93, 100, 103 and 105.
I have lodged the amendments because, although the obligation on “the Scottish Ministers” to
“consult Scottish Natural Heritage and such persons as they consider likely to be interested in or affected”
is welcome, there is an obligation on Scottish ministers to report the outcome of the consultation along with their reasons for their decisions. The Scottish Government should make public the consultation’s outcome in the interests of transparency.
I move amendment 78.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Finlay Carson
The result of the division is: For 4, Against 5, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 78 disagreed to.