The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5898 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Finlay Carson
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 7, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 11 disagreed to.
Amendment 117 moved—[Colin Smyth].
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Finlay Carson
The question is, that amendment 117 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Finlay Carson
The result of the division is: For 1, Against 8, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 117 disagreed to.
Amendment 118 moved—[Colin Smyth].
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Finlay Carson
The investigation provisions that you have amended now suggest that there is no connection between the period of investigation and the period of suspension—there is no link between the two. Is that correct?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Finlay Carson
We might return to that at the next stage. As there are no other comments, Edward Mountain will wind up and indicate whether he wishes to press or withdraw amendment 179.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Finlay Carson
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 7, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 179 disagreed to.
Amendment 48 moved—[Gillian Martin]—and agreed to.
Amendment 119 moved—[Beatrice Wishart].
Amendment 119A not moved.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Finlay Carson
There will be a division.
For
Carson, Finlay (Galloway and West Dumfries) (Con)
Grant, Rhoda (Highlands and Islands) (Lab)
Hamilton, Rachael (Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire) (Con)
Wishart, Beatrice (Shetland Islands) (LD)
Against
Adam, Karen (Banffshire and Buchan Coast) (SNP)
Allan, Alasdair (Na h-Eileanan an Iar) (SNP)
Burgess, Ariane (Highlands and Islands) (Green)
Fairlie, Jim (Perthshire South and Kinross-shire) (SNP)
Forbes, Kate (Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch) (SNP)
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Finlay Carson
At this point in the proceedings, I intend to close the meeting, given the time that it might take to get through the next group of amendments. We have not got as far as I would have liked, but it is not a good idea to start talking to amendments without being able to fully debate them.
Meeting closed at 12:35.Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Finlay Carson
Good morning, and welcome to the fourth meeting in 2024 of the Rural Affairs and Islands Committee. I remind all those members who are using electronic devices to please turn them to silent.
Our business this morning is consideration of the Wildlife Management and Muirburn (Scotland) Bill at stage 2. I welcome to the meeting Gillian Martin, Minister for Energy and the Environment, and her supporting officials.?I also welcome Colin Smyth and Edward Mountain.?I believe that John Mason and Stephen Kerr will be joining us later to speak to their amendments.
Before we begin, I will briefly explain—if it is possible to do such a thing—the stage 2 procedure for members and the public. There will be one debate on each group of amendments. I will call the member who lodged the first amendment in that group to speak to and move that amendment and to speak to all the other amendments in the group. I will then call any other members who have lodged amendments in that group. Members who have not lodged amendments in the group but who wish to speak should catch my attention. If the minister has not already spoken on the group of amendments, I will then invite her to contribute to the debate. The debate on the group will be concluded by me inviting the member who moved the first amendment in the group to wind up.
Following the debate on each group, I will check whether the member who moved the first amendment in the group wishes to press it to a vote or to withdraw it. If they wish to press ahead, I will put the question on that amendment. If a member wishes to withdraw their amendment after it has been moved, they must seek the agreement of other members to do so. If any member objects, the committee will immediately move to the vote on the amendment. If a member does not want to move their amendment when called, they should say, “Not moved.” Please note that any other member present may move the amendment. If no one moves the amendment, I will immediately call the next amendment on the marshalled list.
Only committee members are allowed to vote. Voting in any division is by show of hands. It is important that members keep their hands clearly raised until the clerk has recorded the vote.
The committee is required to indicate formally that it has considered and agreed to each section of the bill, so I will put a question on each section at the appropriate point.
It is unlikely that we will conclude stage 2 at today’s meeting. If we do not, we will do so at our next meeting.
Section 1—Offence of using glue trap
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Finlay Carson
The result of the division is: For 4, Against 5, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 119 disagreed to.
Amendment 79 moved—[Karen Adam].