The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6954 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Finlay Carson
Before we move on to the next question, I note that policy making is, obviously, really important. Do we get that thread running through all policy areas to ensure that the human rights of individuals, particularly those in remote and rural areas, are being addressed? If we consider the national outcomes specifically, there is scant reference to rural areas; however, you could say that there are also other parts of society that do not merit a specific mention. Given the work that you have done, is it a glaring gap that remote and rural areas do not feature more in the work towards achieving positive national outcomes?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Finlay Carson
Good morning, and welcome to the seventh meeting in 2025 of the Rural Affairs and Islands Committee. Before we begin, I ask everyone to please ensure that their electronic devices are switched to silent. The first item on our agenda is consideration of whether to take items 3 and 4 in private. Do we agree to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Finlay Carson
When we looked at children’s rights not that long ago, there was almost an argument that incorporation was not absolutely necessary and that, if people wanted to do the right thing, they could do it without needing legal pressure to do so. Is it possible to improve access to justice for communities in the Highlands and Islands without that incorporation? If so, how do you suggest that it might be done?
09:15Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Finlay Carson
We will certainly come back to that issue, and I hope that I have not stepped on any members’ toes with that question.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Finlay Carson
Have you learned any lessons from your work in the Highlands and Islands that might lead you to take a slightly different approach to your work in the south of Scotland? We do not have the island communities in the south of Scotland, but we have similar challenges. Will you take a slightly different approach in the light of your findings from the Highlands and Islands surveys?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Finlay Carson
That gives me a great way in to congratulate Garlieston primary school, in my region. Under the stewardship of Caroline Howatson, a teacher there, it has recently won an award for the work that it has done on human rights. I regularly see primary schools that are doing that sort of work, which is absolutely fundamental to ensuring that people recognise what they should and should not expect as they go through life. It is great to have the opportunity to say that.
Tim Eagle is next.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Finlay Carson
We move to questions from Rhoda Grant.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Finlay Carson
Our second item of business is an evidence session with the Scottish Human Rights Commission on its report “Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the Highlands and Islands”. I welcome to the meeting Professor Angela O’Hagan, who is the chair of the commission, and Dr Luis F Yanes, who is the Highlands and Islands project leader. Thank you, both, for joining us this morning. I remind you that you do not need to operate your own microphones, as someone will do that for you.
We have until approximately 10:30 for questions, and I will kick off. The commission has been seeking the incorporation of ESC rights for quite some time, and we know that the human rights bill is now delayed. Can you tell us how such a bill would affect the ability to meet human rights obligations in the Highlands and Islands?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Finlay Carson
So, the incorporation of human rights is almost a backstop, but it is required to ensure that other policies that might be trying to deliver human rights have teeth, if you like.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Finlay Carson
Baselining expectations will be quite important. The Scottish household survey showed levels of satisfaction, but was that in relation to what people thought expectations were? I will never forget a former chair of Dumfries and Galloway NHS Board saying that people who live in a certain community—I will not mention which one—“shouldn’t expect that”. In other words, if people move to the area, they should not expect to have a GP or dentist.
Are some of the levels of satisfaction based on what people think they should expect to have? Where we see satisfaction on schools or transport, is that based on someone who lives in a small village thinking that they cannot really expect the bus to come any more than once a day, or they cannot really expect to see a GP without having to travel 50 miles, for instance? If everybody was baselined and they all had the same expectations, those levels of satisfaction would be significantly different.