The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1255 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Emma Harper
Before Lee Ball comes in, I need to remind everyone that I am a nurse and I have worked in recovery rooms and operating theatres with people who were harmed by drugs and alcohol.
While you are responding, Lee, can you say whether the language in the bill needs to change? What language would you suggest?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Emma Harper
Good morning, and thank you for being here.
The bill requires a relevant healthcare professional to diagnose individuals with a drug or alcohol-related problem and then to provide a treatment determination. What are your thoughts regarding the requirement for somebody to receive a diagnosis before they can enter into treatment?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Emma Harper
I have had conversations outwith the committee about the challenges of space and the competition between building houses, pylons and wind turbines and planting trees. People complain to me a lot about battery storage, for instance. They ask, “Why are we putting in battery storage where we should be growing grass to feed cattle?â€
Thinking about how the bill supports parliamentary scrutiny and stakeholder engagement, are there enough protections to make sure that we consider everything when it comes to environmental impact assessments? The bill is about supporting nature recovery and biodiversity, but all these other spatial asks are going on as well.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Emma Harper
I probably need to remind people that I am still a nurse and that I am the co-convener of the cross-party group on lung health. That is why I am asking health-related questions.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Emma Harper
No, that is it, thanks.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Emma Harper
On the back of that, I am thinking about the convener’s example of a pylon replacement project and the wider stakeholder engagement provisions in the bill. I will go back to my earlier questions about parliamentary scrutiny in part 1 of the bill. I know that the stakeholder engagement aims to ensure a collaborative approach to achieving nature recovery targets by consulting with a wide range of groups, including land managers, estates, NGOs and various partners, as well as the local authority, which might already have local place plans in development or even being delivered. Does the bill make provision to include the requirement for stakeholder consultation and agreement? I suppose that that goes back to what the convener was asking about. Does the bill mean that the Government can decide to overrule?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Emma Harper
I am thinking about the three years of looking at numbers and targets and so on. Does there need to be flexibility in gathering data and reporting on it? I am thinking about ground-nesting birds. There are issues with curlew, lapwing and black grouse—if we do not do something now, it might be too late. Maybe we need to be flexible in data gathering.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Emma Harper
Good morning. One of the first things that Professor McCracken mentioned was how much land the Scottish Government has. I looked it up and found that 889,000 hectares, or 11 per cent of Scotland’s land area, is owned by Crown Estate Scotland, local authorities and so on. That is interesting. We could target that area in the bill to help to support the natural environment. That is just an initial comment.
We are talking a lot about targets and governance and about different Government departments working together. Professor Scott, you said that the bill would help to support people speaking to each other, working together and having the targets. Are there any concerns about what is in the bill on specific issues of governance or scrutiny arrangements? How do we make sure that that is mainstreamed? Mainstreaming is language that you have used, as well. Do you have any concerns about how we monitor and scrutinise what the bill proposes?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Emma Harper
I have a supplementary on that. There are cross-portfolio requirements when we are considering biodiversity or health, for instance. The low-emission zones that have been implemented in London have resulted in a reduction in hospital admissions for folk with asthma. We have seen low-emission zones working elsewhere and that is a cross-portfolio good news story. Does the language of the Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill support the need to look at not just biodiversity but health, for instance, when considering the natural environment?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Emma Harper
Good morning. I have a couple of questions about some of the products. Some disposable products now have USB adapters added to them, which may or may not work, so that they are seen as rechargeable rather than single-use products. How will the bill help us to deal with the evolving market of products that claim to be multi-use and rechargeable when they are actually single-use but disguised with a USB connection?