The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1282 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Emma Harper
Food crime was mentioned earlier. Is it a big problem? What do we need to tell people in Scotland to be aware of? I know there was an issue with fake vodka in Coatbridge last September. How do we help people to identify whether, for example, fake vodka is out there?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Emma Harper
Good morning. It will not be a surprise to you to hear that I am interested in ultra-processed foods. I know that there is a difference between processed foods and UPFs. I have been following the work of Henry Dimbleby, Dr Chris van Tulleken and Carlos Monteiro in Brazil. Henry Dimbleby spoke at Dynamic Earth in April 2024—I was privileged to be in the audience and it was really interesting to hear him speak.
I want to be clear about what we are talking about. Ultra-processed foods are created using food tech and food science purely for profit. There are issues in this commerciogenic environment where low-cost ingredients are created from fractioning and then recombining, and chemicals are added that are essentially cosmetic to enhance colours and flavours.
Does Food Standards Scotland have a different view now compared with what was outlined in March 2024 on the topic of processed and ultra-processed foods? We are a year on and more research has been done and presented. I would be interested in hearing about that.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Emma Harper
Should we continue to watch out for the evidence that is coming out from specialists such as Carlos Monteiro in Brazil regarding ultra-processed foods, the chemicals that are added and the enteric substances?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Emma Harper
I am not suggesting a reformulation tax or anything like that, because I know about the challenges for people in areas that are ranked higher in the Scottish index of multiple deprivation, for example. We have heard that kids in the UK are shorter because of the impact of 14 years of imposed austerity, poverty and the challenges with access to healthy, nutritious diets.
I know about fortification, such as the addition of vitamin B12, but my concerns are about emulsifiers, stabilisers, colourings and other additives. I am concerned about all the chemicals such as guar gum, xanthan gum, mango oil and whey powder. Whey was used as a fertiliser for fields, but it is now a product that is used to build the protein that is required in some products.
What can be done to help? Is it a matter of educating people? Is it a matter of restricting what can be displayed at the end of aisles or in front of checkouts? What needs to be done to help to support people to make good choices?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Emma Harper
For the record, can you tell us what the grades are? Is it grade 1 for weak, grade 2 for unsatisfactory and so on?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Emma Harper
I will pick up on what you have just said. A lot of care homes and family contact centres need to be inspected, so what do you mean by “every so often”?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Emma Harper
I have section 3(c) of the Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill in front of me, which concerns the purpose of ensuring consistency with other regimes. It has been suggested to us that that would open up a “race to the bottom” with other regimes. Stakeholders have expressed concerns about that purpose, but my understanding is that it relates to alignment with environmental outcome reports in England, for example.
Could the power in part 2 be used to make substantial revisions to the Scottish EIA regime to align it with environmental outcome reports? I am asking about the purpose of ensuring consistency and compatibility.
11:30Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Emma Harper
I would like a quick clarification, minister. I cannot see how it would be beneficial to exclude any experts from the ability to manage what everybody recognises is a problem with different species of deer, whether the area is urban, periurban, rural, highland or lowland. We have challenges that we need to meet, so I cannot see that excluding anybody would be beneficial, and I propose that we do not exclude NatureScot.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Emma Harper
I will be pretty succinct. We know that we need robust data to make decisions on deer management, especially when deciding when to intervene on the grounds of nature restoration, and we know that different densities of deer cause different damage, so how will the Scottish Government seek to address any gaps in deer population data?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Emma Harper
Will using drones and different ways to gather the data be part of the on-going data gathering process?