The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1296 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Emma Harper
It is obvious that everybody needs to collaborate and work together, and the utmost safety of any policy is crucial. I am curious to know whether the Northern Ireland protocol will have an impact. Under the EU-UK withdrawal agreement, Northern Ireland is in the UK customs territory, but it remains aligned with EU regulations. The rules in Northern Ireland could change in order to remain aligned with the EU, and the framework sets out the structures and processes for managing the impact of such changes. Could changes that result in divergence between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK obstruct any sharing of blood, tissues or organs?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Emma Harper
Good morning, ministers. I am interested in some of our public health priorities. Priority 2 mentions
“A Scotland where we flourish in our early years”.
My question is for Maree Todd. How do we measure, monitor and evaluate whether we have a Scotland where our young people flourish?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Emma Harper
I have a brief supplementary question for Irene Beautyman or Matt Lowther. Is it sufficiently clear which developments generate significant health effects? I am thinking about how someone’s mental health and wellbeing can be impacted by living next to derelict buildings or vacant or abandoned land. There is research that says that abandoned buildings and shops can make us feel unsafe and that run-down environments contribute to anxiety and low mood.
If we are trying to support planning to help mental health, should we be trying to expedite planning to deal with the derelict and vacant buildings that affect mental health? There are many such buildings across the region that I represent, from Stranraer to Dunbar, such as the George hotel in Stranraer’s town centre. Do we need to ensure that developments generate significant health and wellbeing effects, and also deal with the issue of derelict buildings?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Emma Harper
Thanks very much for indulging me, convener. My question is for Dr Matt Lowther. He mentioned the place standard and described the 14 questions in the framework that aim to let communities, public agencies and voluntary groups find aspects of the place to target health, wellbeing and quality of life. How do we know that people are aware of the place standard tool and are using it? Yesterday, I called Dumfries and Galloway Council planning department. It was not aware of the tool but was certainly going to look into it. How do we ensure that such tools, which can support better planning for public health, are available and used?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Emma Harper
That is good to hear. It was only one person I spoke to, so it might be worth my following it up more widely as well.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Emma Harper
It has been quite interesting to hear everyone’s thoughts so far. I want to ask a couple of questions about collaboration and multi-agency working, which some of the witnesses have mentioned. Kevin Kane mentioned Scouts Scotland and Jacqueline Lynn described the role of sportscotland in that regard.
I know that the aim is to have multi-agency working. Will the witnesses provide examples of where there has been good collaboration with schools to support health and wellbeing, and set out what some of the barriers to greater collaboration might be? As Kevin Kane mentioned youth workers, Scouts Scotland and rural issues, I will go to him first, if that is okay, convener.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Emma Harper
Good morning. You have talked a bit about what the national planning framework contains with regard to aspirations for supporting health and wellbeing. Does the framework give enough priority to health and wellbeing in relation to planning decisions? I am not sure who would like to answer that.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Emma Harper
Yes, I have a quick follow-up question about collaboration and the third sector. There are so many different roles being played. It is important that Mike Corbett mentioned minority groups. We do not want to leave anyone behind.
We can get everyone around the table, but how can we ensure that everyone understands what everyone’s role is? Can more be done to improve that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Emma Harper
I have not. Maybe Dr Josie Booth could answer it.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 18 January 2022
Emma Harper
We are talking about cross-border co-operation with the EU, but there is also cross-border co-operation with our neighbours south of the border. I am thinking about zoonotic diseases such as severe acute respiratory syndrome, middle east respiratory syndrome, swine flu and avian influenza—even Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease, in the past. We need to make sure that all the scientists are working together. Will the framework improve co-operation within the UK, so that everybody shares their scientific knowledge and we are better prepared for any future pandemics that we need to worry about?