The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1156 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Emma Harper
You have touched on finance, funding and resources in relation to making improvements through the inshore fisheries management programme. Will part of that work involve exploring whether you need increased funding to implement the programme or even changes to regional governance?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Emma Harper
It is kind of a no-brainer—if there is a requirement to do more work, to expand work or to implement regional-based approaches, more resources will be required.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Emma Harper
I have a couple of questions about eligibility criteria and the definition of “terminal illness”. I know that a very similar bill is going through the United Kingdom Parliament at the moment and want to explore the language of terminal illness in Scotland and England. You said that someone must be terminally ill and in the end stage of their illness to be eligible. Concerns have been raised that that is not only about people with a cancer diagnosis but might apply to someone who has a terminal illness such as motor neurone disease or Parkinson’s. People also might be unable to recover from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, end-stage renal failure or cardiovascular disease, which can be really debilitating. Please give us an overview of the definition of “terminal illness” and how that relates to the bill.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Emma Harper
I will pick up on the duty to refer. Let us say that I am a carer looking after somebody who is at the end of their life in their home, and I am a conscientious objector, and the person I am looking after at the end of their life says, “Okay, that is it—I am done. I want to go down the assisted dying pathway.” How do we support the conscientious objector who is a carer to refer on? Do they just keep their mouth shut, or do we require them to refer? Would it be part of secondary guidance, education and legislation to require them to refer, because this is about the human right of choice at the end of life?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Emma Harper
I have a final question. Are the two independent doctors allowed to confer with each other? I do not know whether the bill makes that explicit. Could they be a doctor at the hospital and a doctor in the GP practice, or could they be two GPs in the same practice? What makes them independent? Are they not allowed to confer with each other during the process?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Emma Harper
That is fine—thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Emma Harper
Another issue that has come up is the language around someone being “unable to recover” from a condition versus a condition being “untreatable”. The language needs to be very precise. We have had conversations around the bill’s use of “unable to recover”, where treatment options have been explored, agreed on and then not proceeded with.
Tell me about the use of “unable to recover” rather than “untreatable”. Somebody who has an eating disorder, for instance, might consider that they have no option to recover from that, but that is not the case, which I say as a healthcare practitioner—I am still a nurse. How do we make sure that the language of the bill is definitive in referring to a terminal illness as a condition that someone is “unable to recover” from?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Emma Harper
I think that other members will come to capacity, so I will leave it there.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Emma Harper
I have a quick question regarding palliative care versus the choice of assisted dying. We have heard evidence from other countries that, even though someone may have opted to go through a process of assisted dying, they might still say, “No, I won’t proceed,” and then continue, knowing that they can still choose that, with a palliative care process. Is that your experience from your research?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Emma Harper
I just wanted to clarify that.