The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1953 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Rachael Hamilton
Can I go back to question 6?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Rachael Hamilton
What are the implications for the humane use of traps if they are interfered with? I have spoken to gamekeepers in my constituency whose traps have been interfered with, which is quite distressing. However, Ross Ewing is suggesting that having related serial numbers could lead to a potential for prosecution for the gamekeepers.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Rachael Hamilton
Convener, I want to explore what happens—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Rachael Hamilton
Thank you. I think that it was not fully answered. I am trying to establish whether the licensing scheme is too broad brush if traps are to be registered with a unique licence number and gamekeepers or others—a trap could also be used in an urban setting—had to do the training for all of the traps. Should the scheme be designed to recognise and accommodate the needs of operators? That is one question.
My second question is about the agreement on international humane trapping standards, which Libby Anderson mentioned. She mentioned the trapping of stoats in Orkney. We have been told that the standards are very high and that those traps are designed in the way that they are because of the high standards rather than because of the need for operator expertise. How can we use that as an example for a licensing scheme when the spring trap is designed to such high standards?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Rachael Hamilton
Does the panel have any views about whether having individual serial numbers that are related to the operator on each trap is proportionate?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Rachael Hamilton
How does our population of rodents compare with those of other countries? Do you have like-for-like figures?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Rachael Hamilton
How do you know? Does someone sit on the hill for that length of time?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Rachael Hamilton
So what you are asking for is what gamekeepers are currently doing, which is using Epicollect5 to monitor some of the activities that the operators are carrying out in terms of innovation technology and that sort of thing. I am sorry—I cannot work it out. I am very confused about how, without having evidence, you establish that operators are following bad practices.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Rachael Hamilton
You did say that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2023
Rachael Hamilton
Good morning, cabinet secretary. Clearly, there is a call to maintain direct payments in tiers 1 and 2. The arguments are made on the basis that, currently, farmers are looking at efficiencies, improving the environment and all the rest of it. Removing those payments without clarity would mean that they could not plan for the future. We know that the livestock industry is contracting and that that genetic bank of high-quality livestock will never be able to be replaced. What impact study has been done on what you have said about pushing that down the line so that we look at it beyond primary legislation?