The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1943 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Rachael Hamilton
I have no interests to declare, but I thank you for asking, convener.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Okay. Can I—
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Thank you, convener.
On the risk assessment, the new transgender prisoner policy states that a
“Risk Management Team, and subsequently the Executive Panel”
decide whether a prisoner poses a risk to other female prisoners and is eligible for transfer to a women’s prison. Are they the risk management team and executive panel that decided that Isla Bryson should be sent to a women’s prison?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Okay. I ask Teresa Medhurst to answer the same question. Are the risk management team and executive panel the same people who placed Isla Bryson in the women’s estate?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Sorry, but I—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 December 2023
Rachael Hamilton
I have a question for Eleanor Kay about the eligibility criteria for support. The bill does not necessarily say which farmers can participate—for example, it does not refer to tenant farmers. Should tenant farmers be explicitly referred to in that section of the bill?
On the issue of transparency on land ownership, is it possible for the land register of Scotland to ensure transparency on land ownership?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 December 2023
Rachael Hamilton
Should tenant farmers be specifically referred to so that they can get access to some of the possible tier 3 and 4 activities?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 December 2023
Rachael Hamilton
Will you say, specifically, whether that should be in the bill, and if so, whether it should be an extra to those objectives or within section 1(c)?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 December 2023
Rachael Hamilton
On the reference to the CAP, I would not say that the outcomes of the previous support mechanism supported farmers 100 per cent.
Davy McCracken talked about the flooding in the north-east, which is being replicated across Scotland as the climate changes. I want to drill down into a bit more detail from David Harley, SEPA and Davy McCracken on some of the objectives. I am concerned that
“the facilitation of on-farm nature restoration, climate mitigation and adaptation”,
which is the objective in section 1(c), will not support farmers and ensure that they can protect the food—protein—that they are growing on their land. Should the bill contain more detail to ensure that farmers have the opportunity to work with organisations such as SEPA and others? That would ensure that farmers are part of the conversation, because, so far, their participation has been very piecemeal. Where could that detail, specifically around a catchment management approach, be added to the objectives?
09:30Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 December 2023
Rachael Hamilton
I will combine a number of questions so that panellists can pick or choose which one they answer.
First, when would you like to see a draft rural support plan? Secondly, should there be a statutory requirement to consult on such a plan? Thirdly, given yesterday’s painful news of cuts to the agriculture budget, do you feel confident that the plan will be accompanied by the resources that are needed to achieve the four objectives that we discussed earlier? Fourthly, what role does the Parliament have in the scrutiny of the plan? Finally, which areas should ministers have regard to when producing the plan?