The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2063 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Okay. My last question on this particular issue is for Sean Black. Do you have regular meetings with the Scottish Government about severe welfare issues and mortality?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Okay. Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
I will develop this line of questioning, convener. Rachel Mulrenan might get an opportunity to answer.
As we know, salmon farms are legally required to report weekly sea lice counts, but Sean Black said that the reporting is messy. Can you categorically say whether the reporting of sea lice and mortality has improved in recent years?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Maybe Sean Black could answer that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
That is really interesting. What would make that exercise more practical and meaningful?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Rachael Hamilton
I refer to my previously discussed amendment 43 on the measurement of zones. You are saying that if, in the future, you need to extend the zones, you will take advice from persons who have an interest. However, in the past, when you were considering an increase in the distance from 150m to 200m, did you consult those who would be captured in that鈥攐r is that for the future rather than the past?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Rachael Hamilton
With respect, convener, I would like to come back to the minister.
That was not what I asked. I asked whether the minister believes that the powers that are set out in the bill are sufficient to extend anything beyond 200m, because that circumstance could arise, whether it is from 150m or 200m.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Rachael Hamilton
I completely agree. I think that it is a difficult landscape right now, because we do not know how other legislation is working in other legislatures. It would have been useful to find that out, but given that this is a brand-new area, we have to take the approach that is proposed. I completely appreciate what Gillian Mackay is saying.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Rachael Hamilton
I thank the minister for that, but I am a bit disappointed that she will not work with me to get the words right so that they are legally competent. I will press amendment 42.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Thank you.
Amendment 43 would reduce the safe zone distance from 200m to 150m. In its stage 1 report, the committee questioned why the default distance of safe access zones had been set at 200m, when evidence suggests that a distance of 150m would be sufficient for all locations except the Queen Elizabeth university hospital.
The committee therefore recommended an alternative approach of setting a standard distance of 150m for safe access zones in Scotland, then using the provisions that are set out in section 7 of the bill to extend that to address the specific circumstances of the Queen Elizabeth university hospital. That would mean that all protected premises that currently provide abortion services in Scotland would be covered. I am interested to hear the minister鈥檚 arguments for a requirement for a 200m zone, given that she has powers to extend the zone from 150m.
My concern is that there will be unintended consequences for those who are captured within this more extreme version of abortion buffer zones鈥攎ore extreme than anywhere else in the world. Ultimately, my concern is that, although we want to deliver enforcement of the law, the impact on freedom of speech needs to be proportionate. This is about medical services and not other services that could be affected unintentionally.
I move amendment 43.