The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1943 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Okay. My last question on this particular issue is for Sean Black. Do you have regular meetings with the Scottish Government about severe welfare issues and mortality?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Okay. Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
I will develop this line of questioning, convener. Rachel Mulrenan might get an opportunity to answer.
As we know, salmon farms are legally required to report weekly sea lice counts, but Sean Black said that the reporting is messy. Can you categorically say whether the reporting of sea lice and mortality has improved in recent years?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Maybe Sean Black could answer that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
That is really interesting. What would make that exercise more practical and meaningful?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Thanks for your explanation. I do not believe that an impact assessment has been done of the unintended consequences of people being captured in the 200m zone. The committee recognises that ministerial powers would be in place to extend the zone from 150m, which is already—almost—a standard buffer zone across the United Kingdom, except for Northern Ireland. It is probably at the farther end of the most extreme measurement in the world.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Does the minister not believe that the powers that are set out in the bill are sufficient to extend the zones? Indeed, it is suggested in the bill that 200m will be a minimum.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Rachael Hamilton
I will make my points in winding up. I did not want to interrupt, because I was interested to hear the full description in what the member had to say. I accept what Gillian Mackay has had to say on this specific subject, but my argument remains: there are already powers in the bill to extend the zones. That is important, because we do not know how the bill will shape itself and develop as we go forward. Buildings change—they change size and become smaller or larger—so having one size of 200m where that is not necessary will capture people in unintended consequences for those—
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Yes.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Amendment 56 makes it a prohibited behaviour to film a person within a designated safe access zone and outlines penalties for such a breach. It is a focused amendment that comes into effect if a person is prevented, impeded or harassed in gaining access to abortion services within the buffer zone, or their decision is influenced by filming within that area.
It is worth sharing with the committee that the amendment is similar to a provision in the Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) Act (Northern Ireland) 2023, which prevents intimidation or harassment of a person through filming within the safe access zone.
Furthermore, I bring members’ attention to the nuance between my amendment and amendment 57, in the name of my colleague Meghan Gallacher, which makes it an offence to record a person in a safe access zone. My amendment focuses on the effects of filming rather than the act of it. As it outlines, effects include
“influencing ... preventing or impeding another person from accessing, providing or facilitating the provision of abortion services,â€
and
“causing harassment, alarm or distress to another personâ€
who is accessing or providing abortion services.
I see both amendments as important, and I look forward to hearing the minister’s view on them.
10:15