The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1959 contributions
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 8 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
What are your thoughts about NatureScot’s shared approach to wildlife management, which was mentioned in the chamber last week? I asked the minister, Màiri McAllan, about how stakeholders in rural settings who know best, such as our conservation farmers or land managers, could be involved in that approach.
To expand on what I am trying to get at, I should say that I am slightly confused about the approach to wildlife management in relation to ensuring that we protect the endangered, red-list species. In one of its reports, NatureScot said that there will be problems if we carry on the way that we are going in relation to capercaillie decline, so we must think about wildlife management in a different way. That very much speaks to this bill, because there has been a lot of comment in our evidence sessions so far about one group of people being treated in one way and another group being treated in another way, with environmentalists almost being seen as better beings than people who work the land every day. Do you see where I am coming from?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 8 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
In the earlier evidence session this morning, the definition of
“management of foxes and mink below ground”
was discussed, and it was suggested that that should be broadened. I do not know whether you agree with that, but perhaps both of you could write to the committee on where you think that the definitions in the bill could be improved.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 8 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I will ask for something to be given to the committee. Mr Macleod, you mentioned the Otterburn project. I know that it is possibly something that we can find online, but it could be beneficial for the committee to look at the references to the Otterburn project that relate to this bill. Mr Orr-Ewing, it would be interesting to know whether the RSPB used the Otterburn project as part of your evidence-based approach to management.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 8 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
That is an interesting point, because the civil servant said last week that the defence would not be able to be proved. It is therefore a bone of contention.
Penny, would you like to come in?
09:45Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 8 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
We are talking very technically here. A lot of people do not understand why we need to control pests. We have a huge land mass, but most people live in the city. I direct this question to Penny Middleton. What happens on land if rabbits, foxes, mink and other species are not controlled?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 8 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I now come to my proper questions. You have all said that different terrains are an issue. Given that there will be a broad range of applications for licences, how will NatureScot understand the number of dogs that should be involved in an action?
Secondly, what happens to the dogs if they are not working? For example, if NatureScot does not understand the density of a forest and it gives a licence for only two dogs to work within that cover, will those dogs get exhausted, which would raise an animal welfare issue? What happens in that instance? What are the practicalities? Do you kill the hounds? What do you do? Are the dogs sent to slaughter? Can we have the absolute raw detail on that, please?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 8 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I will ask all my questions in one, but first I want to go back to the definition of a wild mammal. My question is for Barrie Wade. Should the definition be amended to bring in fox and mink? I just want a yes or no answer.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 8 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I listened to what was said about the loss of livestock. Do any of the panel members believe that there should be a provision in the bill for compensation in the case that it is not possible to control predators?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 8 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I know that the RSPB is evidence led. Are there any provisions in the bill that do not allow the RSPB to take a view in relation to an approach that protects species?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 8 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Lastly, for clarification, the RSPB does not use dogs for pest control, where there is no other method for effective control. Is the pest control done purely by shooting? Who does that? I know that the RSPB shoots hundreds of foxes across the United Kingdom every year. How do you actually do that? Do you have contractors?